Google Cloud Run is optimal for running container at scale.
October 14, 2025

Google Cloud Run is optimal for running container at scale.

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 6 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Google Cloud Run

We use a Docker container that converts images to smaller sizes and makes map tiles with large images for indoor maps for navigation. Using just serverless functions was not enough because of the time limit. Making conversions with images takes running time that was only supported using Google Run, which increases the time limit to 24 hours.

Pros

  • Serverless service.
  • Run python scripts.
  • Manage Docker images.

Cons

  • Increase up time.
  • Make the tasks to standardize the images of the application easier.
  • It is possible to create tile maps that are key to the application.

Do you think Google Cloud Run delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Google Cloud Run's feature set?

Yes

Did Google Cloud Run live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of Google Cloud Run go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Google Cloud Run again?

Yes

It's more suited for having tasks that involve calculation or conversions, like converting big images and tiles. Have tasks that take up to 30 minutes for each execution, Cloud Run is well-suited. But when considering smaller tasks the do not take so much time using Cloud Run is not indicated. Using Google functions is more suited.

Google Cloud Run Feature Ratings

Container Management
6.7
Security and Isolation
7
Container Orchestration
7
Resource Allocation and Optimization
5
Discovery Tools
8
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks
6
Self-Healing and Recovery
8
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging
6

Comments

More Reviews of Google Cloud Run

  1. Home
  2. Container Management Software
  3. Google Cloud Run Reviews
  4. User Review of Google Cloud Run