Built for Teams vs. Brassring

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Built for Teams
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Built for Teams is an HRIS solution that is designed for small and mid-sized businesses. The vendor’s value proposition is that their employee self-service capabilities help to offload work from valuable HR managers while giving employees direct access to important information. Additionally, the vendor says customers select their solution due to the intuitive user interface and their excellent customer service.N/A
Brassring
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
Brassring, formerly from IBM and part of the Kenexa Talent Acquisition Suite, and now sold by Infinite Computer Solutions, is an enterprise grade ATS and onboarding solution. It allows companies to find the right talent, track and manage candidates, and use candidate data to spot trends within the applicant pool.N/A
Pricing
Built for TeamsBrassring
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Built for TeamsBrassring
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
Built for TeamsBrassring
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
9.4
6 Ratings
18% above category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Employee demographic data7.15 Ratings00 Ratings
Employment history10.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration10.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Organizational charting9.95 Ratings00 Ratings
Organization and location management10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
8.0
1 Ratings
0% below category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Benefit plan administration8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Leave and Attendance Management
Comparison of Leave and Attendance Management features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
8.7
5 Ratings
7% above category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Approval workflow8.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Balance details9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Annual carry-forward and encashment9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Employee Self Service
Comparison of Employee Self Service features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
9.5
3 Ratings
16% above category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
View and generate pay and benefit information9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Update personal information10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
HR Reporting
Comparison of HR Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
9.9
4 Ratings
26% above category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Report builder9.94 Ratings00 Ratings
Pre-built reports10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
10.0
2 Ratings
22% above category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
New hire portal10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
-
Ratings
Brassring
7.5
11 Ratings
6% below category average
Job Requisition Management00 Ratings7.711 Ratings
Company Website Posting00 Ratings7.410 Ratings
Publish to Social Media00 Ratings7.710 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting00 Ratings7.711 Ratings
Customized Application Form00 Ratings7.111 Ratings
Resume Management00 Ratings7.410 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention00 Ratings7.110 Ratings
Candidate Search00 Ratings8.310 Ratings
Applicant Tracking00 Ratings8.310 Ratings
Collaboration00 Ratings7.18 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation00 Ratings7.46 Ratings
Email Templates00 Ratings7.710 Ratings
User Permissions00 Ratings7.49 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts00 Ratings7.710 Ratings
Reporting00 Ratings7.110 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Built for TeamsBrassring
Small Businesses
Patriot Software
Patriot Software
Score 9.1 out of 10
Recruit CRM
Recruit CRM
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Paypro Workforce Management
Paypro Workforce Management
Score 9.5 out of 10
Paypro Workforce Management
Paypro Workforce Management
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Infor Human Resources
Infor Human Resources
Score 7.2 out of 10
Vibe HCM
Vibe HCM
Score 4.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Built for TeamsBrassring
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(7 ratings)
8.3
(30 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(12 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
1.8
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
2.6
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Built for TeamsBrassring
Likelihood to Recommend
Objective Inc.
Perfect for allowing employees to track their paid time off and sick days. Useful for providing job summaries, explanation of benefits. We don't use it for tracking compensation, but it could be used for that purpose. We also post job announcements on the platform which is useful for me to see what kinds of jobs we are hiring for.
Read full review
Infinite Computer Solutions, Inc
Kenexa is is well suited for any organization that has more than 3000 employees globally. I would not recommend this to startups or a growing organization with less than 3000 employees. But once you cross this number, Kenexa becomes useful and is a brilliant tool for global operations - recruiting. I would recommend this tool to any organization that has offices in many countries/geographies as well.
Read full review
Pros
Objective Inc.
  • Managing PTO (sick and vacation)
  • Tracking firm demographic information
  • Ensuring that we have plenty of staff in the office each day
  • Employees get easy to use access to all of their time off data
Read full review
Infinite Computer Solutions, Inc
  • Kenexa allows Boolean key word search within a particular requisition so it makes sifting through a high number of applicants manageable and effective
  • Kenexa can be tailored to meet individual business needs. During the time we’ve had Kenexa here I’ve used it in support of a few different business segments and for each the way the system was used to “position” candidate statuses have varied based on the individual need of the business. One example is when interviewing a high volume of applicants internationally, we were able to send qualified applicants through to the “event manager” and it would enable the candidate to select his/her interview date/time based on previously submitted options inputted by our Kenexa users.
  • Kenexa allows one to customize and score questions for each open requisition that applicants complete as they apply. The system then sorts applicants according to the score of candidate answers allowing for easy sorting of top qualified candidates.
Read full review
Cons
Objective Inc.
  • Reporting can be more robust.
  • More user control and real-time communication via the app would be helpful.
  • A better online calendar layout could be more efficient, but the current one is sufficient as well.
Read full review
Infinite Computer Solutions, Inc
  • BrassRing's application system for candidates is prone to freezing and crashing in the middle of the application causing potential candidates to lose all progress. I filled out the application myself and witnessed these issues first hand, on top of several complaints I received via phone and email from candidates attempting to apply via the BrassRing service. Also, the Parsing system within the application is not capable of pulling any meaningful information out of text documents.
  • Each user must be added to each job in order for that job, and the candidates in it, to show up in relevant searches. This becomes a problem when a new team member joins the account and needs access to all of the previous openings just so that they can find candidates already in the system. The account I was working on involved literally hundreds of new openings a month, meaning that any movement of personnel on or off the account would mean having to update potentially thousands of old positions just to allow them to be able to mine the ATS for candidates. I don't see any particular reason why someone with access to the system should have to be given access to each individual job. If a particular position needs to be kept confidential for whatever reason then that individual position should be able to be set to only show to authorized recruiters. The rest of the positions should automatically be searchable by anyone with appropriate access to the ATS to allow for basic level candidate mining and movement.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Objective Inc.
No answers on this topic
Infinite Computer Solutions, Inc
I am confident that the Kenexa product will continue to evolve to meet the needs of our business in an ever changing work environment. The affiliation with IBM also plays a factor as we have a long standing successful relationship with IBM products. We will be looking to integrate other Kenexa products in the near future to streamline our HR processes.
Read full review
Usability
Objective Inc.
No answers on this topic
Infinite Computer Solutions, Inc
I feel like I am pretty decent with computers and systems. It was fairly easy to use it after about a week or two . But I have seen people struggle with it as well as some people not use it at all. It can be slow at times and not work at times. But Its a fine system.
Read full review
Performance
Objective Inc.
No answers on this topic
Infinite Computer Solutions, Inc
Just slow for what we are doing here
Read full review
Support Rating
Objective Inc.
No answers on this topic
Infinite Computer Solutions, Inc
It is a very basic system. It may be OK for entry level positions only. The practice of removing CVs while the recruitment process is ON is disturbing and there is no one to explain or to inform why it is being done. Even a routine mail is not sent to the client/consultant. I am surprised how this system is continuing without too many complaints.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Objective Inc.
No answers on this topic
Infinite Computer Solutions, Inc
We purchased an out of the box solution and that worked well for us.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Objective Inc.
Slightly different focuses and I still use both. Microsoft Visio is great for creating all kinds of diagrams. Whereas Built for Tens is more about people management, so you can set up who is where and track their relationships through the other individuals in the organization. it’s all about using the right tool for the job at hand.
Read full review
Infinite Computer Solutions, Inc
SF ATS was not available at the time and Taleo was thought to be too expensive. In retrospect, given the amount of customization and leveraging of other vendor technology for things like analytics I suspect any cost advantage we realized evaporated
Read full review
Return on Investment
Objective Inc.
  • It makes tracking PTO super easy
  • We replaced a very expensive and clunky custom SharePoint intranet with an extremely cost-effect Built For Teams service.
  • It is super easy to maintain, leaving me free to tackle bigger issues in the organization
Read full review
Infinite Computer Solutions, Inc
  • Kenexa has assisted us in identifying top talent within our target market of applicants.
  • Kenexa may exclude potentially good associates that don't test well.
  • Kenexa clearly defines specific categories and general notes for training, development, & coaching of associates on areas of opportunity.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Built for Teams Screenshots

Screenshot of Interactive org chart allows you to add and reposition people and entire teams.Screenshot of Recruiting and applicant tracking features make hiring a smooth and painless process.Screenshot of Employees have easy access to their PTO balances and history.Screenshot of Onboarding process helps new employees get up to speed quickly while ensuring compliance.Screenshot of Dashboards and reports keep executives and managers in-the-know.