Google Cloud Platform vs. Red Hat OpenShift

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Cloud Platform
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Google Cloud Platform is a suite of cloud computing services used to build apps or take advantage of cloud infrastructural services, achieve legacy infrastructure modernization, or manage enterprise data and analytic needs.N/A
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.
$0.08
per hour
Pricing
Google Cloud PlatformRed Hat OpenShift
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Cloud PlatformRed Hat OpenShift
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google Cloud PlatformRed Hat OpenShift
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Google Cloud PlatformRed Hat OpenShift
Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
Comparison of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) features of Product A and Product B
Google Cloud Platform
8.9
1 Ratings
9% above category average
Red Hat OpenShift
-
Ratings
Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Dynamic scaling10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Elastic load balancing9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Pre-configured templates8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Monitoring tools9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Pre-defined machine images9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Operating system support8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Security controls9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Automation9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Google Cloud Platform
-
Ratings
Red Hat OpenShift
8.0
186 Ratings
2% below category average
Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings8.3158 Ratings
Scalability00 Ratings8.8177 Ratings
Platform management overhead00 Ratings7.7164 Ratings
Workflow engine capability00 Ratings7.7147 Ratings
Platform access control00 Ratings8.3166 Ratings
Services-enabled integration00 Ratings8.0153 Ratings
Development environment creation00 Ratings8.0162 Ratings
Development environment replication00 Ratings8.2155 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings7.6163 Ratings
Issue recovery00 Ratings7.6160 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings8.1165 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Google Cloud PlatformRed Hat OpenShift
Small Businesses
Akamai Cloud Computing
Akamai Cloud Computing
Score 9.0 out of 10
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.1 out of 10
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
Score 9.1 out of 10
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google Cloud PlatformRed Hat OpenShift
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.9
(196 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(9 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(8 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
5.5
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(117 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(8 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(2 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(2 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google Cloud PlatformRed Hat OpenShift
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
Google Cloud Platform is well suited for every project or company that need an infrastructure that is easy to use and manage and also the good price
Read full review
Red Hat
Have great user interface for new developers to adopt Kubernetes than a plain vanilla Kubernetes cluster. cluster management is getting easier and easier in each new version cost needs to be optimized to provide a competitive rate compared to other Kubernetes options in the market More approved / certified operator for other tools like New Relic will be great.
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • Google Cloud Platform provide the autoscale workload when the workload need to scale up or down
  • Great pay-as-you-go pricing model and dashboard report of pricing that help user monitor and optimize the cost
  • Using simpler than other cloud provider
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Obviously, it does container orchestration very well because it's the main purpose of the product. Creating routes has been very easy with the product, creating accessible routes, managing quotas, managing our workspace and our workload has been very efficient with this as well as managing our horizontal scalability.
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • I think Google Cloud Platform can emphasis more on customer support
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Because of how different virtualization is done, there is a learning curve to overcome when switching to it from another hypervisor.
  • Documentation needs to be improved. Just finding the details to set it up is a burden that will keep some people using it.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Google
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
Leverage OpenShift Online constantly at both the free and paid tiers. While AWS is convenient, it often brings more administration than I want to deal with for a quick application (i.e. Drupal or Wordpress blog). OpenShift also simplifies the DNS registration and ability to share application environments with team members
Read full review
Usability
Google
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
As I said before, the obserability is one of the weakest point of OpenShift and that has a lot to do with usability. The Kibana console is not fully integrated with OpenShift console and you have to switch from tab to tab to use it. Same with Prometheus, Jaeger and Grafan, it's a "simple" integration but if you want to do complex queries or dashboards you have to go to the specific console
Read full review
Performance
Google
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
During our peak season (holiday season October-January), when our loads on high-traffic weekends were up significantly, OpenShift reliably held its ground and adjusted to the spikes perfectly. We saw no disturbances or slowdowns in any of the applications, and our customers were able to buy what they needed during their holiday shopping with no disruptions.
Read full review
Support Rating
Google
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
Their customer support team is good and quick to respond. On a couple of occassions, they have helped us in solving some issues which we were finding a tad difficult to comprehend. On a rare occasion, the response was a bit slow but maybe it was because of the festival season. Overall a good experience on this front.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Google
Google Cloud Platform is release later than Amazon web service, I think that why Google Cloud Platform can learned and optimized the Dashboard and some features that make it easy to use and can be cheaper than amazon web service.
Read full review
Red Hat
From what I remember of Pivotal Cloud Foundry/Tanzu, OpenShift has a lot more features. Ultimately, our team went with OpenShift. After trialing multiple providers, we decided OpenShift was the best experience. We also had more confidence in Red Hat.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Google
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
It's easy to understand what are being billed and what's included in each type of subscription. Same with the support (Std or Premium) you know exactly what to expect when you need to use it. The "core" unit approach on the subscription made really simple to scale and carry the workloads from one site to another.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Google
  • It keep my organization stable and save, so that our business objectives still good for 3 years
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Positive: Reduction in physical and virtual machine footprint
  • Negative: Lack of native end to end o11y has caused a great deal of focus from our enterprise monitoring folks
  • Positive: OCP has allowed developers to have a quick and easy space to experiment
Read full review
ScreenShots