IBM presents their Power Systems Virtual Server as a scalable, cost-effective way to run IBM AIX, IBM i and Linux workloads.
N/A
Microsoft Azure
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Azure is a cloud computing platform and infrastructure for building, deploying, and managing applications and services through a global network of Microsoft-managed datacenters.
$29
per month
Pricing
IBM Power Virtual Server
Microsoft Azure
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Developer
$29
per month
Standard
$100
per month
Professional Direct
$1000
per month
Basic
Free
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Power Virtual Server
Microsoft Azure
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
The free tier lets users have access to a variety of services free for 12 months with limited usage after making an Azure account.
Microsoft Azure is a bit expensive when compared to IBM Power System Virtual Server. IBM is a tough competitor in the software world with its working ability. It has the ability to support a number of operating systems. Features in IBM Power System Virtual Server are more and …
Microsoft Azure is one of the best alternatives for IBM Power System Virtual Server. Coming to comparison, firstly I must say about its pricing level. When compared to other virtual servers it is less in cost where even middle and low-level enterprises can make use of it. IBM …
Firstly I can say IBM Power System Virtual Server is much better with respect to cost when compared to Microsoft Azure which is good for small and medium scale industries to afford. IBM facilitates Load Balancing, continuous Performance, and Network Monitoring features which …
When compared to the IBM Power System Virtual Server, Microsoft Azure is a little more costly. Because of its working abilities, IBM is a formidable rival in the software industry. It has the capability of supporting a wide range of operating-system configurations. In terms of …
One of the greatest alternatives to IBM Power System Virtual Server is Microsoft Azure. First, I'd want to point out that it's a lot more expensive than the competition. Because it is less expensive than other virtual servers, even small and medium-sized businesses may afford …
When compared to IBM Power System Virtual Server, Microsoft Azure was a more expensive tool with a response time that was approximately one-tenth as fast. When compared to other platforms, Amazon Web Services is extremely safe and dependable, which makes it a fantastic and …
First and foremost, I believe that IBM Power System Virtual Server is significantly less expensive than Microsoft Azure, making it more affordable for small and medium-sized businesses. The IBM Cloud provides the finest load balancing, continuous performance, and network …
The deployment time period for IBM Power System Virtual Server is very less as compared to Microsoft Azure. It is also simpler to use as compared to Microsoft Azure. The response time is great and the chances of error are minimum. IBM Power System Virtual Server is the future …
Verified User
Analyst
Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
IBM Power System Virtual Server, in my opinion, is more cost-effective for small and medium-sized organizations than Microsoft Azure. When contrasted with Microsoft Azure, IBM Cloud offers superior load balancing, continuous performance, and network monitoring. There is …
The IBM Power System Virtual Server enables you to make use of sophisticated artificial intelligence. IBM Systems are well-suited for running virtually any type of application. It is beneficial to utilize a single platform in order to prevent doing superfluous operations and …
As I usually say, if you are looking for a solid environment, I always advocate going with IBM Power Server because, so far, it has shown to be successful for my company. Always keep usage under control; in certain circumstances, such as during peak hours, you may see a slight …
We don't have any comparison with IBM's excellent playing quality with proper security as Compared to other virtual servers. Overall IBM POWER SYSTEM VIRTUAL SERVER is the best.
I've used a variety of other operating systems servers, including RHEL, Windows Servers, and then IBM Power System Virtual Server, but IBM Power System Virtual Server has provided excellent performance, reliability, and scalability, and I highly recommend it. There are fewer …
IBM Power System Virtual Server has proven really advantageous to our company, allowing us to finish a restricted number of tasks in a shorter amount of time. Due to its dependability, efficiency, and speed, it has been our first choice for many years. The price is quite low …
When compared to other system components, the IBM Power System offers more stability and uptime than the competition. Installing and configuring the IBM Power System Virtual Server was a breeze. Because of the simplicity with which the system may be scaled, no mistakes have …
We might use IBM Power System Virtual Server in situations when we need to swiftly import new data. In terms of speed and performance, it's just too excellent. Even the cost is reasonable, and upkeep is likewise a piece of cake. When compared to other virtual servers, IBM Power …
Companies may quickly modify the models they employ to perform a given task with the help of IBM Power System Virtual Server. For even better decision-making by companies, IBM Power System Virtual Server links with AI from trusted sources. Profitability is supported by the …
Other products didn't have a competitive hybrid cloud model and were primarily cloud-based. All of the other providers that we considered were much more expensive when viewed from a dedicated server standpoint. To ensure that we get the right business support, we chose to work …
IBM Power System Virtual Server allows you to use powerful AI. IBM Systems are well designed to run any kind of application. It helps to use a single platform to avoid unnecessary activities and actions to maintain. It is going to be the one as competitive for all the virtual …
It is more effective and efficient towards the tasks. [IBM Power System] Virtual servers also have the most complete option to create reports for our management. IBM Power System Virtual Server solved our issues with security and helped us to secure our business. And this …
IBM is very competitive and has most of the same features as the other products. The other products did not have a cost-competitive hybrid cloud model and primarily were cloud-based.
Due to its reliability, it is well-suited for mission-critical applications. It is also well suited for running multiple applications on a single server and fully utilizing the server's full capacity. However, it is not well suited for servers that require dedicated IO resources.
In terms of cloud computing, Microsoft Azure is the only comprehensive result the company offers. Regardless of how big or small an organization is, it can make use of this system. As a cyber-security professional, this is your best option for data management. A business that wants to minimize capital expenditures can use Microsoft Azure. Many Microsoft services accept it. People with little or no knowledge of cloud computing may find it impossible. It isn’t the solution for companies that don’t want to risk having only one platform and infrastructure vendor.
Azure simply provides end to end life cycle. Starting from the development to automated deployment, you will find [a] bunch of options. Custom hook-points allow [integration] on-premise resources as well.
Excellent documentation around all the services make it really easy for any novice. Overall support by [the] community and Azure Technical team is exceptional.
BOT Services, Computer Vision services, ML frameworks provide excellent results as compare to similar services provided by other giants in the same space.
Azure data services provide excellent support to ingest data from different sources, ETL, and consumption of data for BI purpose.
In our experience, Azure Kubernetes Survice was difficult to set up, which is why we used Kubernetes on top of VMs.
Azure REST API is a bit difficult to use, which made it difficult for us to automate our interactions with Azure.
Azure's Web UI does a good job of showing metrics on individual VMs, but it would be great if there was a way to show certain metrics from multiple VMs on one dashboard. For example, hard drive usage on our database VMs.
At the moment we are 100% satisfied with the performance and our support team is well used to the process involved. So unless we have some major issues in adopting, we are sure to be with IBM itself.
Moving to Azure was and still is an organizational strategy and not simply changing vendors. Our product roadmap revolved around Azure as we are in the business of humanitarian relief and Azure and Microsoft play an important part in quickly and efficiently serving all of the world. Migration and investment in Azure should be considered as an overall strategy of an organization and communicated companywide.
Power Systems Virtual Server on IBM Cloud for IBMi's overall usability is good, but it can be difficult for new users, some learning is needed, but there are tonns of online documentation.
Microsoft Azure's overall usability has been better than expected. Often times vendors promise the world, only to leave you with a run-down town. Not the case with our experience. From an implementation perspective, all went perfect, and from the user-facing experience we have had no technical issues, just some learning curve issues that are more about "why" than "how"
As with most IBM products the ongoing support for IBM Power Virtual Server is solid and consistent. IBM provides a clear roadmap for receiving support of their products. Both voice and online response is offered. It is obvious that IBM has the internal systems and culture to maintain support functions. This starts from the initial support call to the problem analysis and continues through the problem resolution. Documentation and communication are consistent within this process.
Support is easy with all the knowledge base articles available for free on the web. Plus, if you have a preferred status you can leverage their concierge support to get rapid response. Sometimes they’ll bounce you around a lot to get you to the right person, but they are quite responsive (especially when you are paying for the service). Many of the older Microsoft skills are also transferable from old-school on-prem to Azure-based virtual interfaces.
As I have mentioned before the issue with my Oracle Mismatch Version issues that have put a delay on moving one of my platforms will justify my 7 rating.
They both have their own ups and downs and it totally depends on the team which suits them best. IBM Power Virtual Server has Performance, Scalability, Reliability and Availability, Compatibility, and Good Vendor Support. The specific use case and workload requirements played a significant role. Some workloads may benefit from IBM Power Systems' architecture, while others may perform equally well on alternative platforms.
As I continue to evaluate the "big three" cloud providers for our clients, I make the following distinctions, though this gap continues to close. AWS is more granular, and inherently powerful in the configuration options compared to [Microsoft] Azure. It is a "developer" platform for cloud. However, Azure PowerShell is helping close this gap. Google Cloud is the leading containerization platform, largely thanks to it building kubernetes from the ground up. Azure containerization is getting better at having the same storage/deployment options.
There have also been 80% fewer application crashes due to a lack of resources that previously ran on the X86 platform.
Administration management has been simplified and staff can dedicate themselves to the development of applications, instead of providing support to users when the applications do not respond efficiently, this made staff 45% more productive.
