NGINX Ingress Controller vs. Red Hat OpenShift

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
NGINX Ingress Controller
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
NGINX Ingress Controller is a traffic management solution for cloud‑native apps in Kubernetes and containerized environments.N/A
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.
$0.08
per hour
Pricing
NGINX Ingress ControllerRed Hat OpenShift
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
NGINX Ingress ControllerRed Hat OpenShift
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
NGINX Ingress ControllerRed Hat OpenShift
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
NGINX Ingress ControllerRed Hat OpenShift
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
NGINX Ingress Controller
7.8
2 Ratings
1% below category average
Red Hat OpenShift
-
Ratings
Security and Isolation7.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization7.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Discovery Tools8.21 Ratings00 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks7.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery7.92 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging7.92 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
NGINX Ingress Controller
-
Ratings
Red Hat OpenShift
8.1
191 Ratings
1% below category average
Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings8.3163 Ratings
Scalability00 Ratings8.8181 Ratings
Platform management overhead00 Ratings7.7168 Ratings
Workflow engine capability00 Ratings7.8151 Ratings
Platform access control00 Ratings8.3170 Ratings
Services-enabled integration00 Ratings8.0157 Ratings
Development environment creation00 Ratings8.0166 Ratings
Development environment replication00 Ratings8.2159 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings7.7167 Ratings
Issue recovery00 Ratings7.7164 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings8.1169 Ratings
Best Alternatives
NGINX Ingress ControllerRed Hat OpenShift
Small Businesses
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
Score 9.3 out of 10
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
Score 9.3 out of 10
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
Score 9.3 out of 10
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
NGINX Ingress ControllerRed Hat OpenShift
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(2 ratings)
8.8
(205 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(10 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(8 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
5.5
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(126 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.2
(8 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(2 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(2 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
NGINX Ingress ControllerRed Hat OpenShift
Likelihood to Recommend
F5
Best suited if we have to manage external traffic inside your Kubernetes cluster and want to use granular control to your applications.
Read full review
Red Hat
I've seen multiple universities that have quite investments in Red Hat enterprise virtualization. They don't want to go with the VMware route due to the expense. So Red Hat OpenShift virtualization is a natural fit for them in that environment. I've also seen a lot of VMware customers that are not able financially to sustain the cost increases with the product. So they're looking for an alternative. And Red Hat OpenShift virtualization fills that need.
Read full review
Pros
F5
  • Provide access to containers
  • Manage traffic
  • Route traffic
  • Lightweight
  • Near to zero downtime
Read full review
Red Hat
  • One thing is the way how it works with the GitHubs model on an enterprise business, how the hub and spoke topology works. Hub cluster topology works the way how there is a governance model to enforce policies. The R back models, the Red Hat OpenShift virtualization that supports the cube board and developer workspace is one big feature within. So yes, these are all some features I would call out.
Read full review
Cons
F5
  • Its not related to Ingress functionality but certificate management with cloud vendor would be a feature i would like to see.
Read full review
Red Hat
  • So I don't know that this is a specific disadvantage for Red Hat OpenShift. It's a challenge for anything that Kubernetes face is. There's an extremely large learning curve associated with it and once you get to the point where you're comfortable with it, it's really not bad. But beating that learning curve is a challenge. I've done a couple presentations on our implementation of Red Hat OpenShift at various conferences and one of the slides I always have in there is a tweet from years ago that said, "I tried to teach somebody Kubernetes once. Now neither of us knows what it is."
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
F5
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
Leverage OpenShift Online constantly at both the free and paid tiers. While AWS is convenient, it often brings more administration than I want to deal with for a quick application (i.e. Drupal or Wordpress blog). OpenShift also simplifies the DNS registration and ability to share application environments with team members
Read full review
Usability
F5
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
The virtualization part takes some getting used to it you are coming from a more traditional hypervisor. Customization options are not intuitive to these users. The process should be more clear. Perhaps a guide to Openshift Virtualization for users of RHV, VMware, etc. would ease this transition into the new platform
Read full review
Performance
F5
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
Openshift performance is based on the underlying infrastructure, the K8s design, and the applications' design. Cloud-native applications should have resilience baked in and should not depend on infrastructure resilience. Standard stateful apps may still depend on the underlying infrastructure. It depends on the approach.
Read full review
Support Rating
F5
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
Every time we need to get support all the Red Hat team move forward looking to solve the problem. Sometimes this was not easy and requires the scalation to product team, and we always get a response. Most of the minor issues were solved with the information from access.redhat.com
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
F5
We are already using NGINX which is so reliable, it definitely lends weight to our decision to select NGINX Ingress Controller. Also, even though it is a little more complex to manage, NGINX Ingress Controller definitely have a richer feature set, better performance, caching, traffic management among other features which was why it was chosen.
Read full review
Red Hat
Our developer community is using Red Hat OpenShift for years and they are familiar and comfortable with the product. Red Hat OpenShift UI makes it easier for new developers to adopt without knowing much of Kubernetes. Our platform team feels it’s easy to mange the cluster and upgrades. Other options has more operation overhead and less friendly to developers not have in-depth knowledge of Kubernetes.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
F5
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
It's easy to understand what are being billed and what's included in each type of subscription. Same with the support (Std or Premium) you know exactly what to expect when you need to use it. The "core" unit approach on the subscription made really simple to scale and carry the workloads from one site to another.
Read full review
Return on Investment
F5
  • Security is one of the best objective which we achieve with NGINX Ingress
  • Cost optimization is one of the business objective
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Positive: Reduction in physical and virtual machine footprint
  • Negative: Lack of native end to end o11y has caused a great deal of focus from our enterprise monitoring folks
  • Positive: OCP has allowed developers to have a quick and easy space to experiment
Read full review
ScreenShots