Skip to main content
TrustRadius
Clio

Clio

Overview

What is Clio?

Clio is web-based legal practice management software for solo practitioners and small firms. It is designed to replace multiple different systems (like document management, case management, and accounting software) to streamline the amount of technology that small firms need to…

Read more
Recent Reviews

TrustRadius Insights

Clio is a powerful practice management software that has attracted users who were dissatisfied with their previous software, such as …
Continue reading

Clio Clio Clio

8 out of 10
October 21, 2021
Incentivized
We utilize Clio and Clio Grow for overall client management and billing. total use for client data, contacts, billing, trust management
Continue reading
Read all reviews

Reviewer Pros & Cons

View all pros & cons
Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing

Starter

$49

Cloud
per user/per month

Clio Grow

$59

Cloud
per user/per month

Boutique

$69

Cloud
per user/per month

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Return to navigation

Product Demos

FULL FACE of CLIO | DEMO ( yes peripera is included )

YouTube

NEW STREET PASTEL S/S 2020 EYESHADOW PALETTE by CLIO | review + mini demo

YouTube

DUPES? CLIO RUSTED ROSE vs ROMAND ROSEBUD GARDEN

YouTube

Review Of Clio Law Firm Practice Management Software - Best Legal Billing Software? (New 2020)

YouTube

Renault Clio Seat Belt Problem - Demo 1

YouTube

Clio Kill Cover Cushion Demo

YouTube
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is Clio?

Clio is web-based legal practice management software for solo practitioners and small firms. It is designed to replace multiple different systems (like document management, case management, and accounting software) to streamline the amount of technology that small firms need to manage.

Clio Video

Watch this 2-minute explainer video to see how Clio can transform your law firm. ► Get started with Clio today: https://www.clio.com/ Clio eases the day-to-day of over 150,000 legal professionals spanning 90 countries with intuitive time tracking, billing, matter management,...
 Show More

Clio Technical Details

Deployment TypesSoftware as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based
Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo

Frequently Asked Questions

Clio is web-based legal practice management software for solo practitioners and small firms. It is designed to replace multiple different systems (like document management, case management, and accounting software) to streamline the amount of technology that small firms need to manage.

Reviewers rate Support Rating highest, with a score of 5.8.

The most common users of Clio are from Small Businesses (1-50 employees).
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(87)

Community Insights

TrustRadius Insights are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, 3rd-party data sources. Have feedback on this content? Let us know!

Clio is a powerful practice management software that has attracted users who were dissatisfied with their previous software, such as MyCase. Users have migrated to Clio due to its robustness and ability to solve issues with case management and client development tracking. It serves as a central tool for managing client contact and document databases, integrating with calendaring, sorting matters, recording time, and preparing bills. The software's ability to manage new leads and potential clients through Clio Grow has been particularly useful for the intake department, allowing them to track contact information, notes, and even offer electronic document signing and automated intake forms. Clio Grow's Kanban style board provides a visual representation of each prospective client's status in the intake system, facilitating efficient lead management.

Clio's versatility makes it suitable for various types of legal practices, ranging from small 2-lawyer firms to mid-large firms. It handles a wide range of functionalities like case management, calendars, document signing, time tracking, billing, and payment acceptance. Users appreciate its scalability and consider it a reliable solution that grows with their firms. However, some users have found certain basic features lacking in Clio, such as calendar functionality, appointment notification, and usable client note capabilities. As a result, they have resorted to using alternative software like Google Docs.

For specialized legal practices like mortgage servicer's in-house counsel groups or immigration law firms, Clio has proven valuable in managing matters, documents, case notes, contacts, tasks, reminders, and calendared events. It streamlines administrative tasks such as integrations and billing processes for immigration cases while ensuring professionalism throughout the billing process. With over 200 clients relying on Clio for accounting and billing purposes alone and others using it for comprehensive case management needs within the firm, it has become an integral tool that supports efficient client communication and document storage.

Clio's appeal extends beyond individual lawyers or teams; it serves as a central software that entire organizations can utilize to manage cases, scheduling, document automation and storage, client communication, and more. Its accessibility and easy information retrieval have proven valuable for distributed organizations where telecommuting employees or those in different office locations can access necessary data effortlessly.

While Clio has received praise from many users, there have been instances where users faced challenges. Some users expressed disappointment with Clio Grow, mentioning issues with form integrations and limited form customization options. Additionally, there have been concerns raised about the search function, particularly content search within documents. Users have experienced issues with documents not populating in searches, leading to inefficiency in finding relevant information. Users have reached out to Clio for support through chat and phone calls but have had challenges in getting their issues resolved promptly. They have even resorted to performing screen shares to demonstrate glitches in Clio's system and provide examples of weak search functionality. Unfortunately, support from Clio has been slow in assisting and responding to users' concerns. As a result, some users are considering exploring other document management systems that can offer more effective and timely support.

Despite these challenges, many users have praised the mobile app of Clio, finding it user-friendly and convenient for accessing important information on the go. The ability to search for specific content within documents has also been highlighted as an important feature for users when choosing a document management system. However, the aforementioned issues with document search functionality have caused frustration and inefficiency in locating specific documents.

In conclusion, Clio has proven itself as a robust practice management software that addresses a wide range of needs for legal professionals. From case management and client development tracking to lead management and billing processes, it offers valuable features for solo practitioners, small firms, and mid-large firms alike. However, there are areas where the software falls short, such as calendar functionality, appointment notification, client note capabilities, and document search efficiency. These drawbacks have led some users to seek alternative solutions or explore other document management systems that can better meet their specific needs. Additionally, improvements in customer support response times would enhance the overall user experience with Clio.

Convenient Timekeeping: Several users have found Clio's timekeeping feature to be convenient and easy to use, allowing them to track their billable hours effortlessly by simply pressing a button.

Intuitive Interface and Billing: Many reviewers have praised the new interface of Clio for being user-friendly. They specifically mentioned that the billing feature is intuitive and makes the billing cycle for clients easier, ensuring bills get paid and retainers get replenished with ease.

Extensive API Integrations: Users appreciate Clio's extensive API software integrations, which allow for robust customization of the practice management solution. The developer partnership program has been highlighted as very good by many customers.

Difficulty in Document Management: Some users have expressed difficulty in using the software for document management, stating that it is easier to create Word templates and use Word instead. They find the process cumbersome and inefficient.

Limited File Management Capabilities: There are suggestions from users to improve the software's file management capabilities by allowing easy access to files with certain tags, similar to Mac's tag structure. This would enhance organization and streamline file retrieval.

Lack of Robust Project Management Tools: Users desire the addition of more advanced project management tools to enhance their workflow within the software. They feel that current features are lacking in terms of task tracking, collaboration, and overall project organization.

Users recommend the following actions when using Clio:

  • Utilize the onboarding team to fully understand the benefits of Clio and ensure a smooth transition. Get buy-in from the entire team and manage expectations accordingly.
  • Take advantage of the free trial, request a demonstration, and talk to current users to evaluate Clio's interface and features. Consider alternatives if not technologically inclined.
  • Make use of Clio's one-on-one tutorials for a comprehensive understanding of the software. Create demos and explore its various features to unlock its massive time-saving potential.

By following these recommendations, users believe that Clio can effectively meet their legal practice needs, improve organizational efficiency, and provide valuable support through its online help staff.

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(1-19 of 19)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Score 1 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
We used Clio because we thought it would be more streamlined. After using other applications like CosmoLex and Soluno which, in my opinion, have true software integration, I would absolutely use CosmoLex or Soluno over Clio, which is more expensive but, in my opinion, offers much less.
Score 2 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Clio made us a lot of promises they've been completely unable to deliver on. They said the calendar would notify clients of upcoming court dates and help us track tasks. They promised they'd streamline our processes. Instead, we're just stumbling around a dysfunctional interface and hoping that at some point someone decides we're important enough to respond to.
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
I used Amicus Attorney before switching to Clio over 6 years ago. At the time, I generally liked Amicus; it was powerful but I had to run a server on one of my computers and it was much more complex than Clio as a business owner. Clio is web-based and fairly easy to use. A key at the time was Clio had a universal search that started populated as you type. Amicus had search, but it would not populate as you typed.
Andy Gross | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
I used Needles 5 (desktop) and it was certainly antiquated by comparison. Needles was in some regards more customizable and allowed for tracking more case type specific things - like medical records requests, liens, etc. At the same time, it does not connect to as many third party apps and it was based solely on the desktop, so you needed to log in to a remote server, which was slow.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We did not use any other practice management software, but I did evaluate Rocket Matter as a potential alternative. Rocket Matter does not have the same robust intake software that Clio Grow does and therefore it was not even a plausible alternative for us to implement. Clio is constantly updating and evolving based on feedback from users and that makes it the kind of program that can grow with your business needs.
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
After using MyCase for over 5 years, I realized that it was not working for the firm. The billing aspects, as well as the document aspects of the program were not supporting the natural flow of the work done in the firm. I had looked at Clio originally when I made the decision to go with MyCase and at that time MyCase seemed to be a better solution, despite the limitations in the billing and document aspects of the program. When I started looking for alternatives to MyCase last year, a friend recommended that I look at Clio because it had greatly improved since the last time I had seen it. I was impressed with the management side of Clio right off the bat. I really liked the available integrations with other platforms and the flow of work within Clio was a more natural fit to how work is done at my firm. I really liked the Clio Grow functionality as well. We have been able to integrate it into our marketing initiatives and better track where in our client pipeline we are losing potential clients and where we can improve our processes. Overall, it is a great platform and in my opinion, much more intuitive than MyCase.
Shawn Hamp, Esq. | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
CLIO Grow is custom-tailored for law firms to use off the shelf with some advanced customization options. CLIO Grow has some superior API integration options that integrate with answering services, online chatbot, website contact forms to capture new leads and automatically include them in the intake pipeline. As mentioned previously it integrates with HelloSign for no additional costs.

CLIO Grow also offers API integrations with Mailchimp to add prospects to email drip campaigns in addition to built-in automated email campaigns within its own software.

These features make it far more user friendly, automated, and robust compared with MyCase's CRM feature, and Pipedrive (a non-legal specific CRM).
Jeanie Watt | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
I used Enterprise Elite at my former position. Although it was a complex accounting program, it was not user-friendly. Clio is much more user-friendly and anticipates what we are attempting to retrieve. Time-tracking is a breeze with Clio - the attorneys appreciate that as well as the ability to use the mobile app when away from the office.
Danielle Huntley | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
I selected Clio for the app integrations which appeared better than Rocket Matter. I am lucky to have a fiancê in tech who has helped me tremendously with automation and Clio has been relatively easy to use. When I selected Clio, it didn't look like Rocket Matter had the same level of app integration that I wanted.
December 27, 2017

Clio, an honest revievw

Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
ResellerIncentivized
As a consultant that has used many different software, Clio is among the best. But anyone considering software needs to think about their needs and requirements in order to find the best fit. Simply buying good software will not necessarily fix any issues. The issues need to be identified and targeted in order to find a good fit.
Brad Pearce | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
I switched from MyCase to Clio and haven't looked back. MyCase is decent, but I felt like I could use basic timekeeping/invoicing software for less $$ than MyCase.

Clio has more features, and looks to be working to continually improve.
Trevor Casperson | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
The law offices I worked at used Amicus Attorney and their own homebrew system created by one of the managing partners. I will focus on Amicus mostly, as the homebrew system is not available to anyone else, though I will note that many things that Clio does right is also done by the homebrew.

Amicus, like Clio, was cloud based and synced with MS office products. The issue with Amicus was that the system was extremely slow. It often took a long time to log into the program and putting in billing took longer than necessary. It did not sync well with Office in my opinion either.

Clio works much faster than Amicus, is responsive and offers the same functionality.
Jason Ramsland | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
The UI is far better than MyCase. For RocketMatter, it was 6 vs. half dozen. But for a dumb name, our firm may have chosen rocket matter. They do many of the same things.

Clio has the gravitas of having been first and longest to the cloud based law practice management system. The track record brings about experience and resources.

I'm often frustrated by the lack of transparency about what's coming down the pike and how long it is going to take. I can't say for certain whether this is better or worse than the others, but I have the sense that RocketMatter is better about that.

ProLaw was locally hosted and looks to be built for cataclysmically huge law firms. Not for us.
Return to navigation