Overview
Pricing
Entry-level set up fee?
- No setup fee
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?
Alternatives Pricing
Product Details
- About
- Tech Details
What is Flowplayer?
Flowplayer Features
- Supported: Customizable Templates
- Supported: Version Control
- Supported: Video Support
- Supported: Content Management
- Supported: Customizable Branding
- Supported: Drag & Drop
- Supported: Engagement Tracking
- Supported: Reporting & Statistics
- Supported: Workflow Management
- Supported: Access Controls/Permissions
- Supported: Audience Analytics
- Supported: Audience Engagement
- Supported: Event Scheduling
- Supported: Multiple Camera Feeds
- Supported: Multistreaming
- Supported: Performance Monitoring
- Supported: Session Recording
- Supported: Split/Multi-Screen
- Supported: Video Monetization Tools
- Supported: Collaboration Tools
- Supported: Content Library
- Supported: Multi-Channel Distribution
- Supported: Privacy Options
- Supported: Reporting/Analytics
- Supported: Search/Filter
- Supported: Social Sharing
- Supported: Video Editing
- Supported: Video Streaming
- Supported: Brand Overlay
- Supported: Bulk Uploading
- Supported: Closed Captions
- Supported: Mobile Screen Support
- Supported: Video Looping
Flowplayer Technical Details
Deployment Types | Software as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based |
---|---|
Operating Systems | Web-Based, Mac, Windows, Linux, Chromebook |
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews
Community Insights
- Business Problems Solved
- Pros
- Cons
Flowplayer has gained a reputation among users as a robust and full-featured solution for self-hosted needs. Users have found that Flowplayer seamlessly integrates into their websites, providing an easy and efficient way to display videos to viewers. The platform's fair pricing model is highly appreciated by customers, as it offers a cost-effective solution for their video hosting needs.
One of the key use cases of Flowplayer is its effectiveness in meeting the needs of users. Many users have expressed their satisfaction with Flowplayer, praising its seamless functionality and ease of use. They have found Flowplayer to be a reliable solution without any major complaints. Additionally, compared to other open-source alternatives, Flowplayer stands out for its user-friendly and organized experience, eliminating the frustrations caused by disjointed and disorganized solutions.
While some concerns have been raised about Flowplayer transitioning to a cloud-hosted solution, users have found that the product continues to meet their needs effectively. Despite these initial concerns, Flowplayer has proven to be a nice and reliable solution for displaying videos, making it a popular choice among users. Overall, users appreciate the seamless integration and easy-to-use nature of Flowplayer, making it their go-to option for self-hosted video needs.
Easy setup and comprehensive API: Several reviewers have found that setting up Flowplayer is easy and appreciate its clean and comprehensive API. They consider it a must-have tool for audiovisual professionals.
Responsive support team: Many users have praised the support provided by Flowplayer, mentioning that the support team is responsive and helpful. While some wished for faster response times, they appreciated having any response within a few days rather than no response at all.
Seamless integration and high customization: Reviewers have expressed their satisfaction with how seamlessly Flowplayer integrates with websites and the low impact it has. They also love the high level of customization options offered by Flowplayer, allowing them to tailor it according to their specific needs.
Unresolved Playlist Bugs: Several users have encountered severe bugs related to dynamically loaded playlists with mixed sets of videos containing mixed sets of subtitles and thumbnail tracks. The software fails to switch subtitle or thumbnail tracks, despite being able to switch videos. Users are disappointed that Flowplayer has taken a significant amount of time to address these issues, with multiple delays in the estimated time for the fix. Furthermore, they express frustration that the fix will only be implemented in the new version of the software, forcing them to use the beta version which may introduce additional bugs.
Lack of Prompt Bug Fixes: Some users feel that Flowplayer has not taken their bug reports seriously enough and failed to promptly address reported issues. They suggest that as valuable customers who can help improve the product through their debugging efforts, they should either be compensated or receive a free player for their contribution.
Expensive Pricing Structure: Many users find Flowplayer's pricing to be expensive, particularly for basic needs. They believe that compared to other available players, the cost of just acquiring the player alone is not justified. Additionally, users express dissatisfaction with having to upgrade to a more expensive plan if they want to display ads before their videos, especially when they only use the player for external videos and do not require advanced features.