Ghost Inspector

Ease of Use: Many users have praised Ghost Inspector for its ease of use, making it an excellent tool for beginners in the automation field. The flow provided by the software guides users through each step of the process and makes complex tasks seem straightforward.

Customer Support: Users appreciate that Ghost Inspector's customer support team is highly responsive, supportive, and engaging. They have praised the team for providing assistance to improve their experience and answering questions promptly.

Cost-Effective: Reviewers have highlighted that Ghost Inspector is a cost-efficient automated testing option, making it an excellent choice for companies looking to save costs while streamlining their processes.

Limited Functionality: Some users have expressed frustration that Ghost Inspector has limitations in terms of test flows, such as no if-else validations or while cycles. Additionally, the product does not support versioning of tests setup and Jira integration, grouping, or multiple platforms.

Compatibility Issues: A number of reviewers have noted that Ghost Inspector only supports Chrome and Firefox, which may be a dealbreaker for some users who require compatibility with other browsers like Safari and Edge.

Pricing Complaints: Several customers feel that the pricing plans offered by Ghost Inspector are too steep. While there is a small pricing plan available, some users believe it could be cheaper since they use it infrequently. They also note that even if they pay for a subscription, they cannot run a test for more than 10 minutes at a time.

Based on user reviews, the three most common recommendations for Ghost Inspector are as follows: (1) Use Ghost Inspector for easy-to-use and robust production testing. Users have found Ghost Inspector to be a valuable tool for their testing needs. The platform is praised for its user-friendly interface and ability to handle complex testing scenarios. (2) Consider the scalability of Ghost Inspector for large businesses. While users generally appreciate the functionality of Ghost Inspector, some have mentioned that it may not be as scalable for larger organizations. It is recommended to evaluate the suitability of Ghost Inspector for specific business requirements and consider alternative options if needed. (3) Be cautious when purchasing the Paid Plan if tests run for more than 10 minutes. Some users have noted that the Paid Plan may not be cost-effective if tests frequently exceed the 10-minute mark. It is advised to carefully assess test duration requirements before committing to a paid subscription. Overall, users recommend using Ghost Inspector as a reliable solution for production testing, but also suggest evaluating its scalability and considering cost implications based on test duration needs.