Overall Satisfaction with Adobe Experience Manager
My company utilizes Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) as a CRM for the company website. All images and content are stored within the DAM within AEM. All changes to individual pages are authored through AEM. Each business unit updates their respective site content or implements new components in an effort to launch new campaigns and site optimization.
- Ease of image upload
- Ease of content changes on the spot
- Workflow systems for production
- Allow all vested parties to a project to be notified once any changes occur to a page
- Allow for paid media campaign management
- Increase employee efficiency
- Complete control of content by marketing team
- Great user experience
- Webspehre
Websphere is antiquated.
Content Author / Administrator
100-1,000 pages
Adobe Experience Manager Feature Ratings
Evaluating Adobe Experience Manager and Competitors
Yes - Websphere
- Price
- Product Features
- Product Usability
- Existing Relationship with the Vendor
Websphere was costing the company a lot of money for an outdated system.
Involved the actual users of the program for their evaluation and review prior to purchase
Using Adobe Experience Manager
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Easy to use Well integrated Consistent Quick to learn Convenient Feel confident using | None |
- Access to sites
- Ease of updating content real-time
- DAM uploads
- Coding ( I'm not a coder)
- Developing components -
Yes - We use mobile interface due to the nature of the business