Abstract vs. Azul Platform Prime

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Abstract
Score 4.8 out of 10
N/A
Abstract, from the company of the same name headquartered in San Francisco, offers a collaboration tool for developers and others, featuring a version controlled master file set and approval workflow.N/A
Azul Platform Prime
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Azul Systems headquartered in Sunnyvale is exclusively focused on Java and the Java Virtual Machine (JVM). They build fully supported, standards-compliant runtimes that help enable Java-based businesses. Their services include Azul Platform Prime (formerly Zing), a JVM with "better behavior" enabling sustained performance, fast warmup and predictable latency without GC pauses, jitter or application timeouts. Zing can be deployed in an on-prem data center or on the Cloud.N/A
Pricing
AbstractAzul Platform Prime
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AbstractAzul Platform Prime
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AbstractAzul Platform Prime
Considered Both Products
Abstract
Chose Abstract
There are very few tools that compete with Abstract right now. I would say none of them are even close to this yet.
Chose Abstract
Cloud services help hold files that everyone can access. Absrtact is not that, this is unparalleled for Sketch users; this allows for multiple users to be in the same file and help guide them through conflicts if there are even any of them. Abstract is the only one here solving …
Azul Platform Prime
Chose Azul Platform Prime
Oracle was costlier whereas Openjdk had less frequent updates. Azul was average of both of them, so it was choosen.
Features
AbstractAzul Platform Prime
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Abstract
7.8
Ratings
1% above category average
Azul Platform Prime
-
Ratings
Workflow Automation7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Search8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Abstract
8.7
Ratings
9% above category average
Azul Platform Prime
-
Ratings
Chat10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Notifications9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Discussions8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Abstract
8.1
Ratings
1% above category average
Azul Platform Prime
-
Ratings
Versioning10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Document collaboration8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Access control6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced security features6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Device sync9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AbstractAzul Platform Prime
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10
GraalVM
GraalVM
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
GraalVM
GraalVM
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
GraalVM
GraalVM
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AbstractAzul Platform Prime
Likelihood to Recommend
2.1
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.8
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AbstractAzul Platform Prime
Likelihood to Recommend
  • Large teams with dedicated design operations support
  • UX managers that want a facilitated workflow for their teams
  • Disciplined teams of individual contributors that want to adopt a process in their UI workflow
  • Cross-discipline teams that want a central collaboration space for reviewing and critiquing UI artifacts
  • If your files are named "FOR-REALS_FINAL_FINAL_FINAL_Super-Important-Project (copy).sketch"
  • If you're managing multiple pattern libraries
Read full review
Azul helped use reduce and more efficiently use our AWS EC2 resources. We approached them in Q3 of 2021 with the goal of reducing our overall latency on the JVM 8 platform. They managed to do that for us in such a way that we could expand our options within EC2 for machine architectures and take advantage of additional resources on existing infrastructure that OpenJDK could not at that time.

I'd recommend the platform for teams that are looking to focus on their business problems and not wanting to allocate engineering staff to be full time JVM engineers. I'd also recommend them for companies that have a large extant JVM systems that want a fairly easy way to optimize their current systems without entire rewrites.
Read full review
Pros
  • Allows for collaboration within Sketch.
  • Allows for approval of work by team leads.
Read full review
  • Improved real-time JVM
  • Cost effective
  • product support
Read full review
Cons
  • People and permission management.
  • Sharing particular states (presentation, inspection, etc.).
  • New projects from templates.
  • Pattern library migration (new users).
Read full review
  • Support
  • GC logging
Read full review
Usability
Abstract has a difficult learning curve. If a feature-branch workflow is new to you, then it will take some getting used to. They make a lot of updates to the interface and these feature releases get ahead of their documentation. They rely heavily on an excellent customer support team and are present on various Slack channels to help design professionals with issues.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
No answers on this topic
Good features, Higher throughput, improved security
Read full review
Support Rating
Customer support seems to be fast at responding. We haven't had issues yet at least
Read full review
Prime support has been responsive in helping us tune our JVM parameters and diagnose any lingering Java resource issues.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I purchased and administer Abstract. It was requested by our design department who evaluated it.
Read full review
Oracle was costlier whereas OpenJDK had less frequent updates. Azul was average of both of them, so it was choosen.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Single source of truth for the team.
  • Could quickly get expensive with corporate accounts.
Read full review
  • A lot of OPEX savings
  • Easy annual license renewal subscription
  • Standard product usage since it is compatible across different Operating Systems.
Read full review
ScreenShots