TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    ACCELQ

    Score7.1 out of 10
    N/AACCELQ is an agile quality management platform that helps users achieve continuous delivery for web, mobile, manual testing, and APIs. It can be used to write and manage manual test cases for the functionality that may be too fluid for automation.N/A

    Zephyr Scale

    Score9.5 out of 10
    N/ATM4j is a test management application for Jira, developed by Jira solutions specialist Adaptavist, acquired and now supported by SmartBear since March 2020.

    $4.55

    per month per user

    Pricing
    ACCELQZephyr Scale
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    ACCELQZephyr Scale
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—Free up to 10 users, $4.55/user/month after that. It gets cheaper as you scale.
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    ACCELQZephyr Scale
    Automation Testing
    Comparison of Automation Testing features of ACCELQ and Zephyr Scale
    Feature
    ACCELQ
    8.9
    1 Ratings
    5% above category average
    Zephyr Scale
    -
    Ratings
    Record and Automate9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multi-Browser Testing8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Testing8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Test Scheduling10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Test Management8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    CI/CD Tool Integration8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrated Version Control10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Parallel Testing10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Object Recognition10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data-Driven Testing9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Testing Collaboration7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Real Device Testing10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Testing Reports & Analytics9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Test Management
    Comparison of Test Management features of ACCELQ and Zephyr Scale
    Feature
    ACCELQ
    -
    Ratings
    Zephyr Scale
    7.8
    1 Ratings
    4% below category average
    Centralized test management00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Map tests to user stories00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Test execution reporting00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Defect management00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    ACCELQZephyr Scale
    Small Businesses
    BrowserStack
    Score8.5 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    BlazeMeter
    Score8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Tricentis Tosca
    Score8.8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    ACCELQZephyr Scale
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    ACCELQZephyr Scale
    Likelihood to Recommend
    ACCELQ
    Low code test automation, Ready to pickup platform without having much prior knowledge on automation, AI agent interactions are nearly close to real life scenarios, best API automation scale it has got, QGPT logic builder has really changed the talk with DBs in AI way, Logic insights feature is really impressive to identify possible risk while just started developing web apps.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    Jira and Confluence are widely implemented in organizations of various industries so incorporating Zephyr Scale is a very seamless method of adding scalable testing management. Testing visibility and end to end traceability is possible and integrates in Jira. Developers and engineers are able to take advantage of the built-in reports and statistics and even automate testing. The value is greatly reduced for organizations that do not already implement Jira and Confluence as the native integrated compatibility is much of the value
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    ACCELQ
    • Scriptless and hence coding is easy.
    • Maintenance of the scripts are easy.
    • Learning curve is small.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    • Scalable and compatible with Jira & Confluence
    • Improves testing visibility, data analysis, collaboration with reports & gadgets
    • Easy to retrospectively trace testing with change history
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    ACCELQ
    • Visual regression features
    • Test generation from UI and UX platforms like Figma
    • Manual test tools can be more integrated with AutoPilot
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    • Not as valuable if not already using Jira or Confluence
    • Can be overlooked if the user does not set automation
    • Needs better first time tutorials
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    ACCELQ
    Features like low code, API automation, auto pilot and free account creations, case studies are better suited for my business into IOT space, some of the enterprise automation features are truly game changer in productivity for my team. Database migration was supported seamlessly while opted for ACCELQ solutions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    ACCELQ
    When we implemented ACCELQ, we conducted POCs with many similar solutions. Among the tools we pursued at that time, accelQ stood out against Tricentis Tosca and QMetry automation studio. However, subject 7 did better. However, they were still in the nascent stages of building the tool, and hence we did not pick it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    Zephyr scale is easier to work with and more seamlessly used because it is natively integrated with Jira and Confluence. TestRail cannot provide the same scalable experience and is rather dated and limited in capability. Developers rather use tools that are compatible with each other, and Zephyr scale offers that
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    ACCELQ
    • Overall adoption of an automation tool went up.
    • Migration of existing selenium scripts to ACCELQ was relatively easy and less effort.
    • Lack of overall admin console and hence managing the agents across different execution is difficult.
    • Integration between accelQ and any test management tool can be difficult and buggy in most cases, even though it can be coded.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    • Dozens of added testing capability via integrated gadgets
    • Reduced testing and tracking time
    • Faster and clearer testing operations awareness
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots