Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Acunetix by Invicti
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
AcuSensor from Maltese company Acunetix is application security and testing software.
$4,500
Checkmarx
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Checkmarx, an Israeli headquartered company with US offices, provides a suite of application security software delivered via the Checkmarx Software Security Platform. Individual modules and capabilities include Checkmarx Static Application Security Testing, Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis, Checkmarx Interactive Application Security Testing (CxIAST)N/A
Veracode
Score 8.8 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Veracode provides advanced application security solutions, trusted by enterprises to develop and maintain secure software. Its platform identifies exploitable risks, speeds up vulnerability remediation, and reduces security debt at scale using a proprietary AI-assisted remediation engine.N/A
Pricing
Acunetix by InvictiCheckmarxVeracode
Editions & Modules
Websites Scanned: 5
4,500
Websites Scanned: 6-10
7,200
Websites Scanned: 11-20
10,800
Websites Scanned: 21-35
22,540
Websites Scanned: 36-50
26,600
Websites Scanned: Over 50
Contact for quote
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Acunetix by InvictiCheckmarxVeracode
Free Trial
YesNoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDeveloper pricing options available
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Acunetix by InvictiCheckmarxVeracode
Considered Multiple Products
Acunetix by Invicti
Chose Acunetix by Invicti
In my opinion Acunetix fares good in DevSecOps pipeline better than Appspider. In terms of vulnerabilities scanning of dynamic applications I liked Rapid7, however we have better ROI with Acunetix. During 6 months of usage I tried to look into cost benefit analysis and could …
Checkmarx
Chose Checkmarx
Checkmarx is easier to integrate with development tools and gives quick feedback during coding, which is helpful for developers. Veracode is more focused on scanning and reporting for compliance, but it’s more complex to set up. We chose Checkmarx because it fits better into …
Chose Checkmarx
We actually use Checkmarx along with the other tools. However, the reason we chose Checkmarx is its wide support for languages and useful fix recommendations. The flowcharts help better understand the data flow and give a clear picture of what needs to be fixed and how. Also, …
Veracode
Chose Veracode
Acunetix was too difficult to set up and some features were useless for our product. The results weren't clear, so definitely Veracode is better than Acunetix. We use WhiteSource because the level of detail is much better than Veracode. We didn't choose Veracode over them but …
Chose Veracode
Checkmarx for SAST is easier to integrate and use. It also has a nicer and more convenient UI that shows you the source code and the context of the vulnerabilities identified. However, it is more expensive, not on the cloud so you need your own infrastructure, and it doesn't …
Chose Veracode
I used AppScan for dynamic scanning when it was IBM, but it was too clunky and hard to use. Developers and testers needed to spend quite a bit of time configuring scans. I also used Checkmarx for static scanning and it was faster, but it requires you to install on your own …
Chose Veracode
Checkmarx and Veracode have a few common points and some features which are different. Checkmarx UI is more user-friendly, but the level of detailing in Veracode reports is better. Veracode is a good choice for static analysis of code. if the user interface can be made smoother …
Chose Veracode
Reduced false positives, developers can identify vulnerabilities at early stage -shift left process. The security labs help developers.
Chose Veracode
Veracode is more thorough and provides a wider variety of tools than the competition. Support is prompt and very eager to make sure we get the help we need as quickly as possible. If Support can't resolve it right away, they will make sure we are connected to one of their …
Chose Veracode
Veracode stands out as the best of breed for all types of AppSec scanners.
Chose Veracode
Veracode was brought in to supplement services previously provided by other vendors. As our org recently acquired another organization, we identified Veracode as a 'go-forward' system needed to consolidate security tooling in the organization.
Chose Veracode
During the course of our using Veracode, we still do evaluate other platforms to see what they offer, and how they compare to Veracode. I do most of the evaluations myself, and I still come back to Veracode as being the overall best platform. Most every platform, for better …
Chose Veracode
Better all-round with the right balance for features vs cost.
Chose Veracode
Veracode has a very good integration within its products, which makes it easy for a developer. Veracode helps in providing support both actively and through resources on their platform to remediate and fix the issues found in one's application. The reporting section being …
Chose Veracode
Veracode is an all-in-one solution, whereas the others have various tools, but not an all-encompassing solution.
Chose Veracode
Veracode had better pricing than most of them, and much easier deployment (SaaS) so we don't need to worry about hardware. Even with the only cloud option that was not ideal for us, we embraced it. Also, it supports the technology we are using .NET C# and it works great for us.
Chose Veracode
Veracode is a solution easy to set up and integrate with virtually any pipeline--a single product for three solutions.
Chose Veracode
1. We need only a few features and detailed reporting for static analysis. Veracode is enough to suit that need.
2. We have not used other products since 2013. So Veracode became de-facto standard for us.
Best Alternatives
Acunetix by InvictiCheckmarxVeracode
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.8 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.8 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Acunetix by InvictiCheckmarxVeracode
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(3 ratings)
8.4
(5 ratings)
9.0
(136 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(8 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(2 ratings)
7.3
(27 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(66 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(3 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
5.5
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(2 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Acunetix by InvictiCheckmarxVeracode
Likelihood to Recommend
Invicti Security
It is best suited for integrated security testing of applications which are hosted on web servers. The most important thing is the integration of DevSecOps which is crucial in today's fast paced environment of rapid development. The core of Acunetix is application scanning which is really great and I highly recommend this product to everyone
Read full review
Checkmarx
If you are going with SAST process or want to improve overall security posture then go for it like integrating it with post deployment steps. If you are more concerned about proactive controls better choose other options such as pee-commit hooks and CI security. Also choose other tools for DAST and API scans.
Read full review
Veracode
Veracode is well suited for development applications that can be made more secure right from the beginning. There is an excellent extension in Visual Studio that scans code from the IDE. However, it is less appropriate or incompatible with scanning SOAP or WSDL APIs. It supports only REST APIs.
Read full review
Pros
Invicti Security
  • Fast.
  • Easy-to-use.
  • Great customer support.
  • Reporting features.
  • Supports importing state files from other popular application testing tools.
  • Has other features built-in beyond just scanning for vulnerabilities.
Read full review
Checkmarx
  • Detects security vulnerabilities in source code with accuracy and detail.
  • Integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, IDEs, and repositories.
  • Provides clear reports and actionable fix recommendations for developers.
Read full review
Veracode
  • Veracode performs Static Application Security Testing (SAST) very well by finding flaws in the code using entry points so that it tests for everything a user can interact with in the application. This approach is very helpful for avoiding a lot of false positives early on.
  • Veracode performs SCA automatically on every SAST scan, so that we don't have to manually scan the application again for SCA scans.
  • Veracode integrates very well with the ticketing tools, so that it becomes very easy to track every finding and its status within our ticketing tool.
Read full review
Cons
Invicti Security
  • Configuration of DevSecOps can be improved for ease
  • Dashboard can have API integration
  • Broaden the scope of vulnerabilities
Read full review
Checkmarx
  • Scan duration
  • False positives
  • Integration with other tools like Jenkins comes with some inconveniences.
Read full review
Veracode
  • Scan results stability: from one scan to another, additional flaws appear whereas code did not change.
  • Entry points selection: hard to be sure selection is optimal, should be automatized or hidden.
  • Branches management: we currently use sandboxes to scan different branches of our software. Would be good to have real branches management.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Invicti Security
No answers on this topic
Checkmarx
No answers on this topic
Veracode
At this time, and we just renewed a month ago, I dont see any products out there overall that can offer what Veracode does. Yes, its not cheap by any means, but for the money its the best application security scanning tool out there.
Read full review
Usability
Invicti Security
No answers on this topic
Checkmarx
Their API based customizations which I leveraged to create an ASPM package, which is developer friendly and can extend above the dashboard features, other ones are UI which is great and feels clutter free. Menu and navigation is also good so as support. Only drawback is sometimes scan takes longer which I feel so can be reduced
Read full review
Veracode
- Almost no setup required and easy to configure - Very easy to use, intuitive UI with integrated analytics and learning portals. - Seamless to review the results, triage them, generate reports. - Security progression of the product/application is tracked via successive scans. - Privileges/Roles nicely fine grained and tightly controlled to let teams "view" only their products.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Invicti Security
No answers on this topic
Checkmarx
No answers on this topic
Veracode
Veracode has always been up and available to us.
Read full review
Performance
Invicti Security
No answers on this topic
Checkmarx
No answers on this topic
Veracode
At this point, it runs well and mostly in a timely fashion. Dynamic scans take days but this may be a config issue still to be resolved.
Read full review
Support Rating
Invicti Security
No answers on this topic
Checkmarx
No answers on this topic
Veracode
Overall, Veracode support is helpful, community support is great, and documentation is available for self-service. Our Customer Success Manager is very helpful and reaches out regularly to see if we need assistance. We have not utilized many of the other resources offered by Veracode, however, in the future we would like to leverage secure coding training for our Development teams.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Invicti Security
No answers on this topic
Checkmarx
No answers on this topic
Veracode
We use it as a SAS service, so really just getting our teams to mold the use of Veracode into their SDLC has been a process of years in the making. It comes down to what your teams are ready and willing to accept and change. Management is key in getting their groups on board with using it regularly. If it doesnt have management backing, your security teams have little to no influence in getting this process off the ground fully.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Invicti Security
ZAP is a free tool, and adequate. But it is to that extent less friendly. I would not be as confident of the results and it definitely can't produce reports on par with Acunetix. There would be a lot of legwork on our end if we desired to switch to this tool.
Read full review
Checkmarx
Checkmarx is easier to integrate with development tools and gives quick feedback during coding, which is helpful for developers. Veracode is more focused on scanning and reporting for compliance, but it’s more complex to set up. We chose Checkmarx because it fits better into our development process, offering faster scans and more useful suggestions for fixing problems
Read full review
Veracode
Veracode is slower with scan results however the flaws discovered and sites crawled are almost the same. Rapid7 InsightAppSec only does dynamic scans. Veracode did find more links on a site crawl. Rapid7 InsightAppSec has more out of the box reports than Veracode. Both integration to DevOps tools were striaghtforward.
Read full review
Scalability
Invicti Security
No answers on this topic
Checkmarx
No answers on this topic
Veracode
It meets our needs.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Invicti Security
  • Saved money compared to other commercial scanners, especially over the long run.
  • Scan speed seems to be pretty good compared to some of the bulkier commercial products out there. However, that largely has to do with proper configuration.
  • A downside is that is requires a bit of extra work just to get it set up to scan APIs, web services, etc.
Read full review
Checkmarx
  • Improved ability to provide high level of IA confidence
  • Improved confidence in application-level security
Read full review
Veracode
  • Veracode's platform has had a very positive impact on our security posture, paving the path towards having coverage monitored automatically on hundreds of internal applications throughout the development lifecycle.
  • Veracode's platform has also had a very positive impact on improving the security knowledge of our development team, providing meaningful feedback as well as training options to reduce mitigation time and help to prevent flaws before they are created.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Acunetix by Invicti Screenshots

Screenshot of DashboardScreenshot of FilteringScreenshot of scan results

Veracode Screenshots

Screenshot of a fixScreenshot of the Veracode PlatformScreenshot of SCAScreenshot of SCA Github