Aderant Handshake vs. Amazon CloudSearch

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Aderant Handshake
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Legal software specialist Aderant offers Handshake, the company's Sharepoint compatible knowledge management platform specifically for law firms featuring access via intranet and extranet portals and an enterprise search tool for locating documentation and expertise, and general KM analytics.N/A
Amazon CloudSearch
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Amazon CloudSearch is enterprise search as a service, from Amazon Web Services.N/A
Pricing
Aderant HandshakeAmazon CloudSearch
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Aderant HandshakeAmazon CloudSearch
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Aderant HandshakeAmazon CloudSearch
Top Pros
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
Aderant HandshakeAmazon CloudSearch
Small Businesses
Concrete CMS
Concrete CMS
Score 9.2 out of 10
Algolia
Algolia
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Tridion
Tridion
Score 9.0 out of 10
Guru
Guru
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Tridion
Tridion
Score 9.0 out of 10
Guru
Guru
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Aderant HandshakeAmazon CloudSearch
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
6.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Aderant HandshakeAmazon CloudSearch
Likelihood to Recommend
Aderant
The user of Handshake takes a certain amount of user computer literacy and the user needs to be resourceful. When building our site, I needed to google quite a bit. On the contrary, if budget allows, Handshake developers will do it all for you.
Read full review
Amazon AWS
I would like to mentioned about the scenario where Amazon cloud search was well suited is when we need regular updation of data and the subject matter requires continuous alterations due to the continuous changing environment and talking abut the least appropriate would the times when their is high level of customisation requirements in the project.
Read full review
Pros
Aderant
  • The main reason we got Handshake was to display visual gadgets for our accounting systems. We always provided spreadsheet type reports, but pictures and more engaging. Attorney gets a dashboard in real time of where they stand financially.
  • Additional use as FAQ's in different departments in the firm, that is, accounting, IT, and office services.
  • Knowledgebase - How to's and software.
Read full review
Amazon AWS
  • Really fast queries
  • Good Reporting
  • Reduce the cost of the server
Read full review
Cons
Aderant
  • Documentation is weak, but hopefully, since Aderant just acquired the company, that will improve
Read full review
Amazon AWS
  • First thing I would like to mentioned about its indexing speed, I have noticed while working with large sums of data
  • Second I would like to mentioned about customisation challenge, although it is also its pros but a con as well, as it is a tedious task to customise when time value comes place as well.
  • Thirdly, I do feel that its advanced search queries could be more supported. I have seen some level of lagging when it comes to more advanced search queries given the size of data.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Aderant
None. Always need about Handshake's interface with Aderant, way before Aderant purchased them. Seemed like a natural fit.
Read full review
Amazon AWS
I didn't investigate the best alternatives to CloudSearch, but did help with implementing this feature in our application. But from what i tested and used - Cloudsearch is very fast to get queries. Some negative points can be the time to implement this and some configurations that can be tricky.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Aderant
  • Hard to say, but ultimately putting knowledge in the hands of fee earners immediately it is positive.
Read full review
Amazon AWS
  • It has directly or indirectly improved the operational effiecncy for sure.
  • Its limitations towards limited customisation requirements makes it a bit negative side of the scenario.
  • Its scalability of the growth offers seamless accommodation of large data sets which is a positive impact although.
Read full review
ScreenShots