Amazon Athena vs. Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon Athena
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data directly in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. With a few clicks in the AWS Management Console, customers can point Athena at their data stored in S3 and begin using standard SQL to run ad-hoc queries and get results in seconds. Athena is serverless, so there is no infrastructure to setup or manage, and customers pay only for the queries they run. You can use Athena to process logs, perform ad-hoc analysis, and run…
$5
per TB of Data Scanned
Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Astra DB is a vector database for developers. In 2025 Datastax, the developer and supporter of Astra DB, was acquired. Astra DB is now available as a component of the IBM watsonx.data Multicloud offering.N/A
Pricing
Amazon AthenaAstra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
Editions & Modules
Price per Query
$5.00
per TB of Data Scanned
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon AthenaAstra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon AthenaAstra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
Considered Both Products
Amazon Athena
Chose Amazon Athena
- Super Cost-Effective - Well integrated with the AWS ecosystem - Easy setup with multiple formats.
Chose Amazon Athena
Amazon redshift and EMR require explicit configuration for underlying compute infrastructure. In Amazon Athena, Users don't have to set up any underlying infrastructure. It saves a lot of costs required for infrastructure. Users have to pay only for scanned data. Athena is good …
Chose Amazon Athena
Traefik Mesh, DigitalOcean Kubernetes and Amazon DynamoDB
Chose Amazon Athena
Amazon Athena, a product from Amazon, competes with offerings from Google and Microsoft. Overall, I think your database choice depends on some of the other applications you are running at your company. For example, if you are using Microsoft Power BI for reporting needs, you …
Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
The biggest competitor was Cassandra which we have been using as the self-hosted solution, so we had the option of going to hosted versions as well. The main advantage of Astra was the ability to combine managed experience with scalability, which was Datastax' strong suit. The …
Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
I struggled with understanding the other product and the DataStax team helped us progress in our projects with one on one assistance.
Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
We also (briefly) considered building in-house. We wanted to avoid complex "Frankenstein" architectures. Combining Pinecone with another NoSQL datastore like DynamoDB would have increased complexity. A single-managed platform (Astra DB) enabled architectural simplicity and …
Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
We selected Astra for reducing complexity of our operations, local support, scalability, reliability, and business continuity/contingency planning reasons. We're a small team so prefer a database-as-a-solution model.
Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
Astra DB allowed us running a database without going deep into the configuration hell. It scales with our usage and therefore, there was no need to learn the sepcialities of a vector database.
Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
For the workloads we use Astra DB for it was a better choice than the other databases.
It worked out to be more scalable and cost affective than the traditional relational databases.
Also performant and without the downsides of size limits compared to other services.
Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
I never tried Pinecone with a production workload, but I can say that the enterprise support and care of DataStax is game changer. They really put effort in creating with you a valid and effective solution for your business.
Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
Astra provides all the features that the above products do while also giving us access to cutting-edge features faster.
Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
Astra DB is at par with each one of them as it's scalability and availability is unmatched. The best thing about Astra DB is it's managed service takes care of database operations, freeing up development teams to work on application features. With its scalable architecture and …
Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
Astra DB is a managed database service based on Apache Cassandra that is mostly used for NoSQL data storage and administration, whereas Azure is a full cloud computing platform provided by Microsoft that includes infrastructure, platform, and software services. Astra DB is …
Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
Astra DB, which is built on Apache Cassandra, is well-known for its smooth horizontal scalability, making it an ideal solution for applications with quickly rising data and traffic. Although MongoDB Atlas provides high availability, Astra DB's multi-region capability can …
Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
Since I was familiar with CQL, choosing Astra DB was the only smart choice for me. It is equally capable as all the other cloud-based fully managed database services currently out in the market. It provides very good documentation also for people who are new to it, making it …
Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
Astra DB supports Cassandra which is very important and of key notice. We work on Cassandra , thus we need Astra DB. Astra DB has high availability and scalability. The customer service provided by Astra DB is really helpful and the response is always available. Astra DB has …
Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
Astra DB is more optimized as compared to its rivals in many cases such as the replication provides with maximum uptime.
Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
Astra DB supports apache cassandra which in itself is a plus point. It's primary database model has a wide column store. Deployment of Astra Db takes minutes in AWS, Google Cloud, Azure. Also it is schema free. It also has advanced replication for edge computing. In other …
Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
The tools astra db provides are much more effective and efficient, especially the integration allowed within astra db. One can customize the choice of tools as per their requirements.
Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
Astra DB allows connection and integration with multiple tools and apache products, which gives it an edge against other products in the market.
Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
The integration compatibility Astra DB provides in unmatchable.
Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
Astra DB has a better database system than Mongo DB and that why me and my team prefers using Astra DB over all the database tools available. The Apache Cassandra database is what attracts the user to Astra DB rather than other databases. Wide Column storing database is what we …
Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
Astra Db combines the power of tools and sdk's over the use of cassandra which makes it better than most options out there.
Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
Astra in the general case ends up coming in cheaper than it costs to run your own VMs on a VPS to self-host either cassandra or scylla. How they do that, I don't know, but I'm glad they do!
Chose Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
Some advantages of Cassandra by itself over the other solutions is being masterless and column oriented. About Astra DB, for us the decision-making factor was having a serverless solution and with the latest Cassandra version and features, additionally it provides a rich set …
Features
Amazon AthenaAstra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
Database-as-a-Service
Comparison of Database-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Athena
8.6
Ratings
1% above category average
Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
-
Ratings
Automatic software patching8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Database scalability9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated backups7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Database security provisions9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Monitoring and metrics8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic host deployment9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Vector Database
Comparison of Vector Database features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Athena
-
Ratings
Astra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
8.0
Ratings
0% below category average
Vector Data Connection00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Vector Data Editing00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Attribute Management00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Geospatial Analysis00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Geometric Transformations00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Vector Data Visualization00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Coordinate Reference System Management:00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Data Import/Export00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Symbolization and Styling00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Data Sharing and Collaboration00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Amazon AthenaAstra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
Small Businesses
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
Redis Software
Redis Software
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
Redis Software
Redis Software
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
Redis Software
Redis Software
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon AthenaAstra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon AthenaAstra DB, now part of IBM watsonx.data
Likelihood to Recommend
Best suited for analyzing huge amounts of data by just querying on Amazon Athena. Amazon Athena is also best to integrate with Amazon Quickight for visualization and reporting of data. Easy to work with CSV, JSON, and columnar data formats like Parquet, and ORC. Less appropriate to work with AVRO data format and also stored procedures are not supported in Amazon Athena. The size of a single row is also limited to 32 MB.
Read full review
We use Astra DB to improve our management systems. Storing data has become hassle-free and quite simple. When launching a Cassandra-based cloud application, Astra DB is exactly what you need. In addition to the standard training programs and videos, the extended support and training require significant additional effort to activate and cover which I feel is a bit more tedious task.
Read full review
Pros
  • Load Balance traffic analysis
  • Big data report generation
  • Micro services pattern query analysis
Read full review
  • We need to be able to process a lot of data (our biggest clients process hundreds of milions of transactions every month). However, it is not only the amount of data, it is also an unpredictable patterns with spikes occuring at different points of time - something athat Astra is great at.
  • Our processing needs to be extremaly fast. Some of our clients use our enrichment in a synchronous way, meaning that any delay in processing is holding up the whole transaction lifecycle and can have a major impact on the client. Astra is very fast.
  • A close collaboration with GCP makes our life very easy. All of our technology sits in Google Cloud, so having Astra in there makes it a no-brainer solution for us.
Read full review
Cons
  • Every dialect of SQL has some missing functions. I wish there was automated GROUP BY options here.
  • There are connection problems back to Power BI occasionally.
  • If you don't watch certain queries, it's possible that it takes a long time to run and charges you a lot of money.
Read full review
  • Astra DB might be difficult to understand for people who are unfamiliar with Apache Cassandra. Improving the initial experience for newcomers, as well as offering better documentation and lessons, might be advantageous.
  • The Astra DB ecosystem may be enhanced by expanding the ecosystem of plugins, integrations, and community-contributed solutions.
Read full review
Usability
Easy to use. Scalable. Gets the job of data warehousing setup done. Using the datalake on S3 has become super convenient.
Read full review
It's a great product but suffers with counters. This isn't a deal breaker but lets down what is otherwise a good all round solution
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Their response time is fast, in case you do not contact them during business hours, they give a very good follow-up to your case. They also facilitate video calls if necessary for debugging.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Amazon Athena, a product from Amazon, competes with offerings from Google and Microsoft. Overall, I think your database choice depends on some of the other applications you are running at your company. For example, if you are using Microsoft Power BI for reporting needs, you might want to consider going the Azure route.
Read full review
We also (briefly) considered building in-house. We wanted to avoid complex "Frankenstein" architectures. Combining Pinecone with another NoSQL datastore like DynamoDB would have increased complexity. A single-managed platform (Astra DB) enabled architectural simplicity and strong reliability, allowing Maester’s development team to prioritize high-value, customer-facing features
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
We are well aware of the Cassandra architecture and familiar with the open source tooling that Datastax provides the industry (K8sSandra / Stargate) to scale Cassandra on Kubernetes.
Having prior knowledge of Cassandra / Kubernetes means we know that under the hood Astra is built on infinitely scalable technologies. We trust that the foundations that Astra is built on will scale so we know Astra will scale.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It's easy to store and query data on S3. Multiple teams can query the same data to generate their reports. It removes the need for a full-fledged data warehouse for a startup. Saves costs.
  • Improved team efficiency on monitoring user activities by easy logging and reporting.
  • As the dataset gets heavier on S3, one needs to understand partitioning and that leads to the requirement of expertise.
Read full review
  • Database growth planning is less of a concern with Astra, as it scales automatically.
  • Currently, they lack fine-grained security at the table level. I suspect that will change over time.
  • If your load has peaks and valleys; Astra enables only paying for Reads/Writes; thus you do not need to pay for large servers to support peaks in load.
Read full review
ScreenShots