Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) vs. AWS CodeArtifact

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) is a scalable, high performance container management service that supports Docker containers.
$0
per hour per GB
AWS CodeArtifact
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
AWS CodeArtifact is a fully managed artifact repository service that aims to make it easy for organizations of any size to securely store, publish, and share software packages used in their software development process. CodeArtifact can be configured to automatically fetch software packages and dependencies from public artifact repositories so developers have access to the latest versions.N/A
Pricing
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)AWS CodeArtifact
Editions & Modules
AWS Fargate Launch Type Model
Spot price: $0.0013335. Ephemeral Storage Pricing: $0.000111
per hour per storage
Amazon EC2 Launch Type Model
Free
Amazon ECS on AWS Outposts
Free
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)AWS CodeArtifact
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsThere is no additional charge for Amazon ECS. You pay for AWS resources (e.g., Amazon EC2 instances or Amazon EBS volumes) you create to store and run your application. You only pay for what you use, as you use it; there are no minimum fees and no upfront commitments.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)AWS CodeArtifact
Features
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)AWS CodeArtifact
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
8.1
6 Ratings
0% below category average
AWS CodeArtifact
-
Ratings
Security and Isolation9.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Container Orchestration8.55 Ratings00 Ratings
Cluster Management7.86 Ratings00 Ratings
Storage Management8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization7.35 Ratings00 Ratings
Discovery Tools7.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks8.66 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery8.46 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging8.26 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)AWS CodeArtifact
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.0 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)AWS CodeArtifact
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(12 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.4
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)AWS CodeArtifact
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon AWS
Amazon ECS is well suited for the scenarios where you want to deploy a microservice to a cloud and instead of manually specifying instance size, number of instances and then specifying the configurations and connecting it with other cloud services like database service, secret manager service etc., you just want to specify these configurations as a file and using that file, the ECS would deploy the service and keep it healthy. It might be less suited for a scenario when you don't want to stick to AWS specific solution for your microservice deployment. The ECS configuration file is specific to AWS ECS and may not be useful for other cloud providers like Azure etc.
Read full review
Amazon AWS
We have a small team with limited resources and it worked well for us. Hence I can conclude that AWS Code Artifact are well suited for organizations which have limited resources in terms of hardware and access to administrators for setting up artifact repository in-house. AWS Code Artifact is also suited particularly well for organization(s) which are already using AWS Services/Infrastructure (eg. EC2) . It works quite well with existing AWS services and completes the gap which existed in AWS offering for quite some time. Organizations can move their entire DevOps toolchain and infrastructure to Amazon. It is less appropriate for organization(s) which rely on artifacts like Debian, C/C++, Go etc as AWS does not support those fully.
Read full review
Pros
Amazon AWS
  • One of the biggest advantages is the flexibility to change underlying EC2 instances. As the traffic or demand increases, we can easily change EC2 instances without any issues.
  • Amazon ECS APIs are extremely robust and one can start and stop containers by firing one post request only. So, it is not mandatory to keep the demo solutions up for every time. Just at the time of demo fire the command - make the container up and running - do the demo - down the container with API. A simple portal can control every container which helps non-technical (sales, marketing) to do the demo without keeping the solutions up for the entire time frame.
Read full review
Amazon AWS
  • Code Artifact is a cloud based artifact repository so there is no installation required.
  • Code Artifact comes with out of the box security. Using RBAC and encryption
  • Total cost of usage is less than setting up in-house servers
  • It is accessible from any where.. so no additional network setup is required.
Read full review
Cons
Amazon AWS
  • Another AWS Service - While AWS has a service for just about everything, that is also a negative point. There is no service that does 4 out of 4 things you need. This service does 3 out of 4, another service does the fourth thing you need and another two things that the other service does.
  • With AWS things in general, it's really hard to remain cloud agnostic. Keep that in mind.
Read full review
Amazon AWS
  • CodeArtifact does not support packages like debian. It will be nice to see them support that.
  • Does not provide security scanning of the packages
  • Lacks support for third party CI/CD toolchain like Jenkins
Read full review
Usability
Amazon AWS
Aside from some ECS-specific terms to learn at first, learning & starting to use ECS is relatively straightforward. AWS docs on the topic are also of high quality, with sound & relevant examples to follow. Troubleshooting container issues is also a breeze thanks to CloudWatch integration & helpful error messages on the AWS console.
Read full review
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Amazon AWS
Support is relatively good, although the documentation sometimes is lacking, as well as outdated in our experience, especially when we initiated the process of using this service. But once we found how to assemble things, we haven't really required support from anyone at AWS, the service works without problems so we haven't had the need to contact support, which speaks well of how ECS is built.
Read full review
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Amazon AWS
I chose Amazon ECS over Amazon EKS and other products because the whole infrastructure was decided to be designed on AWS cloud and Amazon ECS made it easier to make the clusters live in just a few minutes. Amazon ECS has better integration with other AWS services and we don't have to look for plugins to do the things, everything is available and can be configured from the AWS console.
Read full review
Amazon AWS
AWS CodeArtifact is an excellent choice for organization(s) which are looking to move their infrastructure and devops toolchain to Amazon. It is very useful for teams/organizations on limited budget or do not want to take on infrastructure and maintenance costs associated with the artifact repository. Other software solutions require resources for setting up and need ongoing maintenance.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Amazon AWS
  • Easy to manage as it has an orchestrator to manage the containers.
  • Less costs and more flexibility with Fargate.
  • Negative (tied to AWS, so could not easily integrate other tools like running a Redis cluster. Still, it works but not easily like Kubernetes.
Read full review
Amazon AWS
  • Overall CodeArtifact has positive ROI on the our team. We had limited budget for procurement of server/administrators. With CodeArtifact we were able to get some savings.
  • We were able to deliver faster hence customers were quite happy. That led to customer satisfaction
  • We didnt have to invest on maintaining network infrastructure/uptime and security. That saved us quite a bit of hassle and funds.
Read full review
ScreenShots