TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) vs. Azure Container Apps

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Amazon EKS

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/AAmazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) is a managed container service to run and scale Kubernetes applications in the cloud or on-premises, available on AWS or on-premise through Amazon EKS Anywhere.

    $0.10

    per month

    Azure Container Apps

    Score5.7 out of 10
    N/AAzure Container Apps, part of the Azure suite of products from Microsoft, is a service used to deploy containerized apps without managing complex infrastructure. Users can write code using a preferred programming language or framework, and build microservices with full support for Distributed Application Runtime (Dapr). Scale dynamically based on HTTP traffic or events powered by Kubernetes Event-Driven Autoscaling (KEDA).N/A
    Pricing
    Amazon EKSAzure Container Apps
    Editions & Modules
    Amazon EKS Cluster
    $.10
    per hour of each cluster created
    vCPU (seconds)
    active usage $0.000024 and idle usage $0.000003
    per second 180,000 vCPU-seconds free grant per month
    Memory (GiB-Seconds)
    active usage $0.000003 and idle usage $0.000003
    per second 360,000 GiB-seconds free grant per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Amazon EKSAzure Container Apps
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Amazon EKSAzure Container Apps
    Container Management
    Comparison of Container Management features of Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) and Azure Container Apps
    Feature
    Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)
    8.9
    1 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Azure Container Apps
    -
    Ratings
    Security and Isolation9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Container Orchestration8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cluster Management8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Storage Management9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Resource Allocation and Optimization9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Discovery Tools8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Update Rollouts and Rollbacks9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Self-Healing and Recovery10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform-as-a-Service
    Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) and Azure Container Apps
    Feature
    Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)
    -
    Ratings
    Azure Container Apps
    5.3
    2 Ratings
    37% below category average
    Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings5.82 Ratings
    Scalability00 Ratings7.82 Ratings
    Platform management overhead00 Ratings6.02 Ratings
    Workflow engine capability00 Ratings5.82 Ratings
    Platform access control00 Ratings4.42 Ratings
    Services-enabled integration00 Ratings4.82 Ratings
    Development environment creation00 Ratings4.22 Ratings
    Development environment replication00 Ratings4.02 Ratings
    Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings5.62 Ratings
    Issue recovery00 Ratings4.02 Ratings
    Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings5.82 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Amazon EKSAzure Container Apps
    Small Businesses
    Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Score8 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Foundry
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
    Score8.6 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Private
    Score9.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    SUSE Rancher
    Score9.4 out of 10
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Score8.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Amazon EKSAzure Container Apps
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    6.6
    (2 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    2.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Amazon EKSAzure Container Apps
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Amazon AWS
    It is well suited when you want to have a Kubernetes cluster in AWS Cloud and want to avoid all the management overhead of maintaining your own cluster in terms of the control plane. EKS seems to be lacking in features when compared with AKS and GKE. Backups, service mesh, and monitoring have a lot of room for improvements.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Azure Container Apps is a welcome addition for sure. Based on my experience, this has enabled us to move fully to the cloud and managed everywhere in one spot and on the go. We can scale it to our end as much as we would like. It can be assess anywhere and it is fully secure
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Amazon AWS
    • Upgrade the kubernetes clusters to the latest version with a single click
    • Auto scaling policies to automatically scale the nodes
    • Detailed logs and events on the cluster within the EKS clusters portal, cloudwatch logs and metrics
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Gives user a level of autonomous access
    • No control plane or node pool to manage
    • Less kubernetes experience required
    • Easily integrate with Azure devops
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Amazon AWS
    • AWSIAM integration with Kubernetes RBAC could be better.
    • Enabling some add-ons like service mesh, and monitoring will be nice instead of having to install them yourself after the creation of the cluster.
    • EKS bootstrap time could be faster ...
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Continue to enhance security
    • Better pricing
    • Flexibility
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    I would rather use AKS for my critical applications. The fact that the deployment process is dependent on as cli makes it hard for us to integrate with our standard CI/CD tools
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Amazon AWS
    Cluster maintanence is reduced, easier to deploy resources, great observability insights
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Azure Container Apps are fantastic and it is a game changer. I would recommend it to anyone considering it. As you can scale it to what you would like and it is fully cloud native with better security. It is a no brainier not to consider it. I do believe that with further improve it will become even more attractive
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Amazon AWS
    It feels like AWS is behind the EKS race, the only advantage I'm able to see right now is the support of IPv6, however, trying to promote AWS alternatives that are different from the market and more like a vendor locking solutions like ECS/Fargate have kept AWS behind and focusing on the wrong things. EKS needs to really improve its integration with the Kubernetes ecosystem and have an enterprise solution for monitoring, backups, and service mesh.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Amazon AWS
    • Good performance of platform without hiccups
    • Less number of people required to manage cluster
    • Easier to deploy new microservices
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • As it is cloud native, we no longer required to have onsite prem
    • Reducing both from an energy and security perspective
    • It is worth the investment as we have saved about 10% of our ICT cost
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots