Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) vs. Azure Container Apps

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon EKS
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) is a managed container service to run and scale Kubernetes applications in the cloud or on-premises, available on AWS or on-premise through Amazon EKS Anywhere.
$0.10
per month
Azure Container Apps
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
Azure Container Apps, part of the Azure suite of products from Microsoft, is a service used to deploy containerized apps without managing complex infrastructure. Users can write code using a preferred programming language or framework, and build microservices with full support for Distributed Application Runtime (Dapr). Scale dynamically based on HTTP traffic or events powered by Kubernetes Event-Driven Autoscaling (KEDA).N/A
Pricing
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)Azure Container Apps
Editions & Modules
Amazon EKS Cluster
$.10
per hour of each cluster created
vCPU (seconds)
active usage $0.000024 and idle usage $0.000003
per second 180,000 vCPU-seconds free grant per month
Memory (GiB-Seconds)
active usage $0.000003 and idle usage $0.000003
per second 360,000 GiB-seconds free grant per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon EKSAzure Container Apps
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)Azure Container Apps
Features
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)Azure Container Apps
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)
8.9
1 Ratings
9% above category average
Azure Container Apps
-
Ratings
Security and Isolation9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Container Orchestration8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cluster Management8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Storage Management9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Discovery Tools8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)
-
Ratings
Azure Container Apps
5.3
2 Ratings
38% below category average
Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings5.72 Ratings
Scalability00 Ratings7.72 Ratings
Platform management overhead00 Ratings6.52 Ratings
Workflow engine capability00 Ratings5.72 Ratings
Platform access control00 Ratings4.62 Ratings
Services-enabled integration00 Ratings4.72 Ratings
Development environment creation00 Ratings4.32 Ratings
Development environment replication00 Ratings4.02 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings5.42 Ratings
Issue recovery00 Ratings4.02 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings6.22 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)Azure Container Apps
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.0 out of 10
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)Azure Container Apps
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(2 ratings)
6.4
(2 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
2.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)Azure Container Apps
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon AWS
It is well suited when you want to have a Kubernetes cluster in AWS Cloud and want to avoid all the management overhead of maintaining your own cluster in terms of the control plane. EKS seems to be lacking in features when compared with AKS and GKE. Backups, service mesh, and monitoring have a lot of room for improvements.
Read full review
Microsoft
Azure Container Apps is a welcome addition for sure. Based on my experience, this has enabled us to move fully to the cloud and managed everywhere in one spot and on the go. We can scale it to our end as much as we would like. It can be assess anywhere and it is fully secure
Read full review
Pros
Amazon AWS
  • Upgrade the kubernetes clusters to the latest version with a single click
  • Auto scaling policies to automatically scale the nodes
  • Detailed logs and events on the cluster within the EKS clusters portal, cloudwatch logs and metrics
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Gives user a level of autonomous access
  • No control plane or node pool to manage
  • Less kubernetes experience required
  • Easily integrate with Azure devops
Read full review
Cons
Amazon AWS
  • AWSIAM integration with Kubernetes RBAC could be better.
  • Enabling some add-ons like service mesh, and monitoring will be nice instead of having to install them yourself after the creation of the cluster.
  • EKS bootstrap time could be faster ...
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Continue to enhance security
  • Better pricing
  • Flexibility
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
I would rather use AKS for my critical applications. The fact that the deployment process is dependent on as cli makes it hard for us to integrate with our standard CI/CD tools
Read full review
Usability
Amazon AWS
Cluster maintanence is reduced, easier to deploy resources, great observability insights
Read full review
Microsoft
Azure Container Apps are fantastic and it is a game changer. I would recommend it to anyone considering it. As you can scale it to what you would like and it is fully cloud native with better security. It is a no brainier not to consider it. I do believe that with further improve it will become even more attractive
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Amazon AWS
It feels like AWS is behind the EKS race, the only advantage I'm able to see right now is the support of IPv6, however, trying to promote AWS alternatives that are different from the market and more like a vendor locking solutions like ECS/Fargate have kept AWS behind and focusing on the wrong things. EKS needs to really improve its integration with the Kubernetes ecosystem and have an enterprise solution for monitoring, backups, and service mesh.
Read full review
Microsoft
Read full review
Return on Investment
Amazon AWS
  • Good performance of platform without hiccups
  • Less number of people required to manage cluster
  • Easier to deploy new microservices
Read full review
Microsoft
  • As it is cloud native, we no longer required to have onsite prem
  • Reducing both from an energy and security perspective
  • It is worth the investment as we have saved about 10% of our ICT cost
Read full review
ScreenShots