Amazon FSx vs. Azure NetApp Files
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Amazon FSx | Score8.1 out of 10 | N/A | Amazon FSx is a cloud storage service designed to make it easy and cost effective to launch, run, and scale feature-rich, high-performance file systems in the cloud. It supports a range of workloads boasting reliability, security, scalability, and broad set of capabilities. As a fully managed service, it handles hardware provisioning, patching, and backups, and supports four widely-used file systems: NetApp ONTAP, OpenZFS, Windows File Server, and Lustre. | N/A |
Azure NetApp Files | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Azure NetApp Files is a Microsoft Azure file storage service built on NetApp technology, giving users the file capabilities in Azure that core business applications require, with pricing plans for different performance tiers. | $0.02 per month |
| Amazon FSx | Azure NetApp Files | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Azure NetApp Files (ANF) cloud file storage service is charged per hour based on the provisioned ANF capacity. Customers can provision a minimum of 4TiB of ANF capacity and then add additional provision capacity in the increments of 1TiB. Cross Region Replication pricing varies by the desired replication frequency per unit of data, and the region of the destination volume. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Amazon FSx | Azure NetApp Files | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 8 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 8 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers | |
| Amazon FSx | Azure NetApp Files | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| File Sharing & Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cloud Storage Security & Administration |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cloud Storage Platform |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amazon FSx | Azure NetApp Files | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | IDrive Online Backup and Object Storage e2 Score9.1 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Object Storage Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Apple iCloud Score8.4 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers Score8.7 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ownCloud Score9.2 out of 10 | SAP on IBM Cloud Score9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Amazon FSx | Azure NetApp Files | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.9 | 8.0 |
| Amazon FSx | Azure NetApp Files | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |

