TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Amazon Route 53

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/AAmazon Route 53 is a Cloud Domain Name System (DNS) offered by Amazon AWS as a reliable way to route visitors to web applications and other site traffic to locations within a company's infrastructure, which can be configured to monitor the health and performance of traffic and endpoints in the network.

    $0.40

    Per Zone Per Month

    Azure Traffic Manager

    Score9.7 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft's Azure Traffic Manager operates at the DNS layer to quickly and efficiently direct incoming DNS requests based on the routing method of your choice.N/A
    Pricing
    Amazon Route 53Azure Traffic Manager
    Editions & Modules
    Standard
    $0.40
    Per Zone Per Month
    Queries
    $0.60
    Per Million Queries
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Amazon Route 53Azure Traffic Manager
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Amazon Route 53Azure Traffic Manager
    Considered Both Products
    Amazon AWS
    No answer on this topic
    Microsoft
    Chose Azure Traffic Manager
    Amazon Route 53 Traffic Flow does what [Azure] Traffic Manager does, however, in Azure Configuration is separated between Azure DNS Zones (For DNS Zone Management) and [Azure] Traffic Manager for DNS Traffic Management and Load Balancing, Route 53 in a unified product for DNS …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    23 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    22 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    23 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    95%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    18 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    22 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Best Alternatives
    Amazon Route 53Azure Traffic Manager
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Azure DNS
    Score8.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Google Cloud DNS
    Score10 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Amazon Route 53Azure Traffic Manager
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (26 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (6 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.6
    (6 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Amazon Route 53Azure Traffic Manager
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Amazon AWS
    - Routing users to the closest or best-performing resources: Route 53 allows you to use geolocation and latency-based routing to route users to the resources that will give them the best performance. - Load balancing: Route 53 can be used to distribute incoming traffic across multiple resources, such as Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) instances or Amazon Elastic Container Service (ECS) tasks, to improve the availability and scalability of your application. - Managing domain names: Route 53 can be used to register domain names and manage DNS records, making it a one-stop solution for managing your domain name and routing traffic to your resources. Scenarios where Route 53 is less appropriate include:Applications with very high query rates: Route 53 is designed to handle millions of queries per second, but if your application generates an extremely high query rate, you may need to use a specialized DNS service.Applications that require very low latency: Route 53 is designed to provide low-latency DNS service, but if your application requires ultra-low latency, you may need to use a specialized DNS service or a self-hosted DNS solution.Applications that require advanced security features: Route 53 provides basic security features such as DNSSEC, but if your application requires advanced security features such as DDoS protection, you may need to use a specialized DNS service.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Azure Traffic Manager is a great product, if you have multiple sites hosting similar services (Primary and DR), and you want to ensure that users are directed to the DR in case of a primary datacenter failure, [Azure] Traffic Manager does this very nicely. If you have a service hosted across multiple regions/datacenters and you want to balance the inbound load between the regions, [Azure] Traffic Manager does this very well, of course such scenario would require a database replication or something like Cosmos-DB in the backend [Azure Traffic Manager] is also well suited for inbound traffic with multiple IPs, you can fail-over traffic from one inbound IP to another based on its availability, or if you have multiple internet connections that you want to balance the load across, it does this pretty nicely too.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Amazon AWS
    • Uptime - Route53 is highly performant and available. We have had only 3-4 instances in the last 12 years when we had any downtime or outages due to Route53.
    • Extensive API layer on Route53 that allows integration with external tools and SDK's (Boto, Terraform, etc)
    • Closely integrated with the other AWS services. Makes it easy to operate the infra.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Performance DNS Load Balancing for Lowest Latency Endpoint to Clients
    • Priority-Based DNS Load Balancing to ensure maximum up time for a service
    • Geographic-based DNS Load Balancing to force certain clients in certain regions to connect to specific endpoints
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Amazon AWS
    • During initial setup when you are using Route 53 or DNS systems for very first time, there are little number of documentation from AWS which is kinda of little tough. But, once you get hold of it, its a cake walk for everyone.
    • Health checks are kinda of little costly when Compared to other big players, but that doesn't affect much when you compare its uses.
    • The logging is well structured though its costly
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Traffic View is a great feature, but doesn't work very well, sometimes it gets stuck and stops loading traffic view data
    • Automatic probing for endpoints sometimes gets stuck too, I would recommend a technique to test the endpoint in real time from Azure Portal
    • Traffic View heatmap is buggy and doesn't point correctly to locations
    • Traffic View portal doesn't show source countries (Shows coordinates) it would be much more helpful to have coordinates auto-translated to geolocations/countries
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Amazon AWS
    You need to know what DNS is; this is a tool built for developers who already know the technology and are just looking for a DNS management tool. The tool is very usable given that. If you're not familiar with DNS, Route53 isn't really for you and you won't find it to be very usable-- you'll need to go read the documentation, and that will start with learning what DNS is
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Amazon AWS
    Until today, I have never needed support to Route53 because the documentation is great. But, I have needed it for other services. And they're near perfect always. Except that they don't have Portuguese support yet and they're sometimes slow to answer (48 hours in non-critical ones, in two tickets). But usually, they're amazing!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Amazon AWS
    We chose Amazon Route 53 over Azure DNS for its advanced routing, built-in health checks, and seamless integration with AWS services like EC2, ALB, and CloudFront. Amazon Route 53 also supports domain registration and automated failover, which Azure DNS lacks natively. Its global reliability and automation capabilities made it ideal for our multi-region AWS setup, while Azure DNS is better suited for simple, Azure-only environments without complex routing needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Amazon Route 53 Traffic Flow does what [Azure] Traffic Manager does, however, in Azure Configuration is separated between Azure DNS Zones (For DNS Zone Management) and [Azure] Traffic Manager for DNS Traffic Management and Load Balancing, Route 53 in a unified product for DNS Traffic Management using Traffic Flow and DNS Zone Management. Route 53 does a great job, however, we found it to be a little bit more complex to setup than [Azure] Traffic Manager, Setting up traffic manager is pretty easy even for the first time, and getting the best out of it is relatively simple.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Amazon AWS
    • All of our brand domain names (about 80 brands) are managed in there
    • Many non marketing or brand domains are also in there
    • There isn't any defined ROI because it's such a trivial and necessary service with impacts all business operations
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Service cost is exceptionally low
    • Overall, this product saves a lot of money for the value it provides and it isn't expensive
    • It's around half a dollar per million queries, which is truly peanuts, extras may be required if you do advanced configuration
    • I can't see any reason why any business wouldn't be using this product, very low investment for a very high return and savings
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots