Amazon S3 Glacier vs. OpenText Email Archiving and Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon S3 Glacier
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
The Amazon S3 Glacier storage classes are purpose-built for data archiving, providing a low cost archive storage in the cloud. According to AWS, S3 Glacier storage classes provide virtually unlimited scalability and are designed for 99.999999999% (11 nines) of data durability, and they provide fast access to archive data and low cost.
$0
Per GB Per Month
OpenText Email Archiving and Management
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
OpenText's Email Archiving and Management solution suite presents an enterprise information archiving (EIA) option as an extension of the company's ECM / Content Services solutions, with options available for Microsoft Exchange, Lotus Notes, and Google Apps, as well as supporting instant messaging (IM) archiving.N/A
Pricing
Amazon S3 GlacierOpenText Email Archiving and Management
Editions & Modules
Bulk Retrieval Pricing
$0.0025
Per GB Per Month
Storage Pricing
$0.004
Per GB Per Month
Retrieval Pricing
$0.01
Per GB Per Month
Expedited Retrieval Pricing
$0.03
Per GB Per Month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon S3 GlacierOpenText Email Archiving and Management
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon S3 GlacierOpenText Email Archiving and Management
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Amazon S3 GlacierOpenText Email Archiving and Management
Small Businesses
Barracuda Essentials
Barracuda Essentials
Score 9.2 out of 10
Barracuda Essentials
Barracuda Essentials
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Barracuda Essentials
Barracuda Essentials
Score 9.2 out of 10
Barracuda Essentials
Barracuda Essentials
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Microsoft Exchange
Microsoft Exchange
Score 8.6 out of 10
Microsoft Exchange
Microsoft Exchange
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon S3 GlacierOpenText Email Archiving and Management
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(7 ratings)
9.6
(2 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon S3 GlacierOpenText Email Archiving and Management
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon AWS
If your organization has a lot of archival data that it needs to be backed up for safekeeping, where it won't be touched except in a dire emergency, Amazon Glacier is perfect. In our case, we had a client that generates many TB of video and photo data at annual events and wanted to retain ALL of it, pre- and post- edit for potential use in a future museum. Using the Snowball device, we were able to move hundreds of TB of existing media data that was previously housed on multiple Thunderbolt drives, external RAIDs, etc, in an organized manner, to Amazon Glacier. Then, we were able to setup CloudBerry Backup on their production computers to continually backup any new media that they generated during their annual events.
Read full review
OpenText
The OpenText Email Archiving and Management solution allows us to centrally manage all of your mailboxes, including PSTs, MSG files, and EMLs. Before implementing this solution, we had several different tools that struggled to work across platforms. It is a great email archiving and management tool for any business no matter its size. It's extremely user-friendly for the everyday employee and the tech support team is fantastic.
Read full review
Pros
Amazon AWS
  • Cheap storage of backup data.
  • Can be used as a part of the entire suite of tools from Amazon, without requiring you to leave the familiar stack.
Read full review
OpenText
  • It Reduces the risk of email tampering or illegal destruction.
  • Cost-effective email storage.
  • Easily manage a large number of emails and able to find specific with advance search.
  • User Friendly.
Read full review
Cons
Amazon AWS
  • Accessing data stored in Glacier is slow. That shouldn't be a surprise, but it is undesirable nonetheless.
  • Retrieving a large amount of data can be expensive; Glacier's intended use is as an archive of rarely-accessed data.
  • Some users regard Glacier with fear and uncertainty. Slow retrieval time and high retrieval cost are the greatest risks of using Glacier, and they are also the Glacier interaction that most users have the least experience with.
Read full review
OpenText
  • Implementation can be a little sluggish.
  • Indexing can take a moment if injecting old data.
Read full review
Usability
Amazon AWS
It is difficult to delete the data as you have to wait for inventory and then bucket modification has to expire.
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Amazon AWS
Since the rest of our infrastructure is in Amazon AWS, coding for sending data to Glacier just makes sense. The others are great as well, for their specific needs and uses, but having *another* third-party software to manage, be billed for, and learn/utilize can be costly in money and time.
Read full review
OpenText
With the power and advantage of the Zix and AppRiver products now part of the solution, consider adding email encryption to your deployment as well.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Amazon AWS
  • Helped us meet compliance requirements while minimizing costs.
  • Simple integration with almost no changes required to our existing S3 management policies.
Read full review
OpenText
  • Saves our time and money by managed and retain all of our important business emails in one place.
Read full review
ScreenShots