TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS) vs. IBM Astra Streaming vs. RabbitMQ

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Amazon SQS

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AAmazon Web Services (AWS) Provides the Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS), a managed message queue service which supports the safe decoupling and distribution of different components in a cloud infrastructure and cloud applications.

    $0

    per GB

    IBM Astra Streaming

    Score10 out of 10
    N/ANow from IBM, Astra Streaming is a serverless data streaming and event stream processing service integrated in the Astra Portal and powered by Apache Pulsar™.N/A

    RabbitMQ

    Score9.5 out of 10
    N/ARabbitMQ, an open source message broker, is part of Pivotal Software, a VMware company acquired in 2019, and supports message queue, multiple messaging protocols, and more. RabbitMQ is available open source, however VMware also offers a range of commercial services for RabbitMQ; these are available as part of the Pivotal App Suite.N/A
    Pricing
    Amazon SQSIBM Astra StreamingRabbitMQ
    Editions & Modules
    All Data Transfer In
    $0.00
    per GB
    Standard Queue
    $0.00000004
    per request
    FIFO Queue
    $0.00000005
    per request
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Amazon SQSIBM Astra StreamingRabbitMQ
    Free Trial
    NoYesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Amazon SQSIBM Astra StreamingRabbitMQ
    Considered Multiple Products
    Amazon AWS
    Chose Amazon SQS
    I wanted to select "RabbitMQ" instead of IBM Cloud Messages for RabbitMQ....
    At first, we have some instances running RabbitMQ but SQS is a fully managed queuing service it was way more convenient to use it and get rid of RabbitMQ !
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon SQS
    The reason for the choice is due to maintenance needs and HIPPA compliance, as well as the great options under the AWS ecosystem, with very useful configurable parameters.
    Incentivized
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Open Source
    Chose RabbitMQ
    It is very easy to use as it has a simple function to connect and use RabbitMQ.
    It is having Fast Learning curve, Any newbies can learn it in a week or month. It is having proper documentation, we are able to find all the details about its functionality and usage of it.
    The …
    Incentivized
    Chose RabbitMQ
    For basic use cases, SQS is way easy to deploy and maintain compared to RabbitMQ. RabbitMQ can cover a lot more use-cases but actually, we did not face specific scenarios that make it necessary to come back to RabbitMQ.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    91%
    Would buy again
    10 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    11 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    91%
    Happy with the feature set
    10 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    7 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    11 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    Amazon SQSIBM Astra StreamingRabbitMQ
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Apache Kafka
    Score8.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Apache Kafka
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Apache Kafka
    Score8.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Apache Kafka
    Score8.9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Amazon SQSIBM Astra StreamingRabbitMQ
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.1
    (7 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.9
    (11 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.5
    (4 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Amazon SQSIBM Astra StreamingRabbitMQ
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Amazon AWS
    If you are looking to build something that just requires a simple queue service (as the name implies) this is great for it. You might look elsewhere though if you get into more complicated needs. This is also very well suited if you are already using other services with AWS and intend to fully build whatever you are building in AWS. If you are looking for a mixed environment -- SQS is not for you
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    DataStax Enterprise is a state-of-the-art data management platform that manages our own data across web, mobile, and IoT applications. It is a hybrid cloud-based solution that enables us to meet the availability and performance requirements of web, IoT and mobile platforms.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    It is highly recommended that if you have microservices architecture and if you want to solve 2 phase commit issue, you should use RabbitMQ for communication between microservices. It is a quick and reliable mode of communication between microservices. It is also helpful if you want to implement a job and worker mechanism. You can push the jobs into RabbitMQ and that will be sent to the consumer. It is highly reliable so you won't miss any jobs and you can also implement a retry of jobs with the dead letter queue feature. It will be also helpful in time-consuming API. You can put time-consuming items into a queue so they will be processed later and your API will be quick.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Amazon AWS
    • It provides an always-available serverless queue for workflows or mission-critical processes.
    • Is extremely low cost and overall costs to our environments have been negligible.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Easy to operate and save man hours
    • Easy installation and configuration
    • Mature and scalable data warehouse, well supported
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • What RabbitMQ does well is what it's advertised to do. It is good at providing lots of high volume, high availability queue. We've seen it handle upwards of 10 million messages in its queues, spread out over 200 queues before its publish/consume rates dipped. So yeah, it can definitely handle a lot of messages and a lot of queues. Depending on the size of the machine RabbitMQ is running on, I'm sure it can handle more.
    • Decent number of plugins! Want a plugin that gives you an interface to view all the queues and see their publish/consume rates? Yes, there's one for that. Want a plugin to "shovel" messages from one queue to another in an emergency? Check. Want a plugin that does extra logging for all the messages received? Got you covered!
    • Lots of configuration possibilities. We've tuned over 100 settings over the past year to get the performance and reliability just right. This could be a downside though--it's pretty confusing and some settings were hard to understand.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Amazon AWS
    • Almost all of the functionality has been covered by SQS, but they could improve the throughput time.
    • Also, they could provide built-in Cloud Watch, so that we can easily configure it without any external efforts.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Their solution is expensive compared to other resolutions, however you get what you pay for.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • It breaks communication if we don't acknowledge early. In some cases our work items are time consuming that will take a time and in that scenario we are getting errors that RabbitMQ broke the channel. It will be good if RabbitMQ provides two acknowledgements, one is for that it has been received at client side and second ack is client is completed the processing part.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Open Source
    RabbitMQ is very easy to configure for all supported languages (Python, Java, etc.). I have personally used it on Raspberry Pi devices via a Flask Python API as well as in Java applications. I was able to learn it quickly and now have full mastery of it. I highly recommend it for any IoT project.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Amazon AWS
    Online blogging and documentation for SQS is great. There are many examples of implementing it and if you look hard enough, more than likely there are examples that meet the exact case with which you are working
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Open Source
    I gave it a 10 but we do not have a support contract with any company for RabbitMQ so there is no official support in that regard. However, there is a community and questions asked on StackOverflow or any other major question and answer site will usually get a response.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Amazon AWS
    The most comparable products are RabbitMQ, and perhaps ActiveMQ. Until recently, AWS did not offer a managed ActiveMQ product. Running RabbitMQ will never be to my team's competitive advantage; we wanted a managed service.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Open Source
    RabbitMQ has a few advantages over Azure Service Bus 1) RMQ handles substantially larger files - ASB tops out at 100MB, we use RabbitMQfor files over 200MB 2) RabbitMQ can be easily setup on prem - Azure Service Bus is cloud only 3) RabbitMQ exchanges are easier to configure over ASB subscriptions ASB has a few advantages too 1) Cloud based - just a few mouse clicks and you're up and running
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Amazon AWS
    • Positive impact - time allocation towards different features
    • Negative impact - too many resources dedicated towards debugging
    • Positive impact - less manual labor during testing
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • In my personal opinion, I can mention that this product has enormous positive points because it has worked really well for us in our organization in a very positive way, for which we ourselves feel quite comfortable with this product.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Positive: we don't need to keep way too many backend machines around to deal with bursts because RabbitMQ can absorb and buffer bursts long enough to let an understaffed set of backend services to catch up on processing. Hard to put a number to it but we probably save $5k a month having fewer machines around.
    • Negative: we've got many angry customers due to queues suddenly disappearing and dropping our messages when we try to publish to them afterward. Ideally, RabbitMQ should warn the user when queues expire due to inactivity but it doesn't, and due to our own bugs we've lost a lot of customer data as a result.
    • Positive: makes decoupling the web and API services from the deeper backend services easier by providing queues as an interface. This allowed us to split up our teams and have them develop independently of each other, speeding up software development.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots