TrustRadius

Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS) vs. IBM Integration Bus

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon SQS
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Provides the Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS), a managed message queue service which supports the safe decoupling and distribution of different components in a cloud infrastructure and cloud applications.
$0
per GB
IBM Integration Bus
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
IBM Integration Bus, replacing the former WebSphere Message Broker, is used to connect applications together, regardless of the message formats or protocols that they support. This connectivity helps to ensure diverse applications can interact and exchange data with other applications in a flexible, dynamic, and extensible infrastructure.N/A
Pricing
Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS)IBM Integration Bus
Editions & Modules
All Data Transfer In
$0.00
per GB
Standard Queue
$0.00000004
per request
FIFO Queue
$0.00000005
per request
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon SQSIBM Integration Bus
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS)IBM Integration Bus
Best Alternatives
Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS)IBM Integration Bus
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
Score 8.7 out of 10
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 7.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
Score 8.7 out of 10
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 7.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS)IBM Integration Bus
Likelihood to Recommend
7.1
(7 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS)IBM Integration Bus
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon AWS
If you are looking to build something that just requires a simple queue service (as the name implies) this is great for it. You might look elsewhere though if you get into more complicated needs. This is also very well suited if you are already using other services with AWS and intend to fully build whatever you are building in AWS. If you are looking for a mixed environment -- SQS is not for you
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
IBM
Routing, protocol transformation, message transformation and service aggregation are very well performed by WebSphere Message Broker (WMB). It is not very suitable for integration with databases.
Srinivasa Manne | TrustRadius Reviewer
Srinivasa Manne
Principal Software Engineer Developer
Read full review
Pros
Amazon AWS
  • It provides an always-available serverless queue for workflows or mission-critical processes.
  • Is extremely low cost and overall costs to our environments have been negligible.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
IBM
  • Graphical data mapper
  • Support for different programming languages
  • Integration with MQ
  • Support for different parsers
Srinivasa Manne | TrustRadius Reviewer
Srinivasa Manne
Principal Software Engineer Developer
Read full review
Cons
Amazon AWS
  • Almost all of the functionality has been covered by SQS, but they could improve the throughput time.
  • Also, they could provide built-in Cloud Watch, so that we can easily configure it without any external efforts.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
IBM
  • Logging
  • Debugging
  • Code quality tools
  • Feature specific installation
Srinivasa Manne | TrustRadius Reviewer
Srinivasa Manne
Principal Software Engineer Developer
Read full review
Support Rating
Amazon AWS
Online blogging and documentation for SQS is great. There are many examples of implementing it and if you look hard enough, more than likely there are examples that meet the exact case with which you are working
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Amazon AWS
The most comparable products are RabbitMQ, and perhaps ActiveMQ. Until recently, AWS did not offer a managed ActiveMQ product. Running RabbitMQ will never be to my team's competitive advantage; we wanted a managed service.
Gavin Hackeling | TrustRadius Reviewer
Gavin Hackeling
Data Scientist
Read full review
IBM
Websphere message broker supports a lot more protocols than any other similar tool.
Srinivasa Manne | TrustRadius Reviewer
Srinivasa Manne
Principal Software Engineer Developer
Read full review
Return on Investment
Amazon AWS
  • Positive impact - time allocation towards different features
  • Negative impact - too many resources dedicated towards debugging
  • Positive impact - less manual labor during testing
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
IBM
  • It helped us in improving the speed to market for our services/APIs.
  • Learning curve is quite long
Srinivasa Manne | TrustRadius Reviewer
Srinivasa Manne
Principal Software Engineer Developer
Read full review
ScreenShots