TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Apache Flink vs. Evam Continuous Intelligence Platform

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Apache Flink

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AApache Flink is a framework and distributed processing engine for stateful computations over unbounded and bounded data streams. Flink has been designed to run in all common cluster environments, perform computations at in-memory speed and at any scale. And FlinkCEP is the Complex Event Processing (CEP) library implemented on top of Flink. Users can detect event patterns in streams of events.N/A

    Evam Continuous Intelligence Platform

    N/A
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    EVAM is a real-time Continuous Intelligence Platform for customer journey orchestration having real-time data integration and streaming advanced analytics with ML/AI. Evam Continuous Intelligence Platform is deployed in different industries including Telco, Banking, Retail & Loyalty, and Transportation, and addresses digital transformation, innovation, agile and multi-channel initiatives for different domains such as fraud, marketing, sales, and operations. The vendor states their…N/A
    Pricing
    Apache FlinkEvam Continuous Intelligence Platform
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Apache FlinkEvam Continuous Intelligence Platform
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Apache FlinkEvam Continuous Intelligence Platform
    Streaming Analytics
    Comparison of Streaming Analytics features of Apache Flink and Evam Continuous Intelligence Platform
    Feature
    Apache Flink
    8.7
    1 Ratings
    10% above category average
    Evam Continuous Intelligence Platform
    -
    Ratings
    Real-Time Data Analysis10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Ingestion from Multiple Data Sources7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Low Latency10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data wrangling and preparation6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Linear Scale-Out9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Enrichment10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Apache FlinkEvam Continuous Intelligence Platform
    Small Businesses
    Amazon Kinesis
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Amazon Kinesis
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Spotfire Streaming
    Score5 out of 10
    Spotfire Streaming
    Score5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Apache FlinkEvam Continuous Intelligence Platform
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Apache FlinkEvam Continuous Intelligence Platform
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Apache
    In well-suited scenarios, I would recommend using Apache Flink when you need to perform real-time analytics on streaming data, such as monitoring user activities, analyzing IoT device data, or processing financial transactions in real-time. It is also a good choice in scenarios where fault tolerance and consistency are crucial. I would not recommend it for simple batch processing pipelines or for teams that aren't experienced, as it might be overkill, and the steep learning curve may not justify the investment.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    EVAM
    No answers on this topic
    Pros
    Apache
    • Low latency Stream Processing, enabling real-time analytics
    • Scalability, due its great parallel capabilities
    • Stateful Processing, providing several built-in fault tolerance systems
    • Flexibility, supporting both batch and stream processing
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    EVAM
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    Apache
    • Python/SQL API, since both are relatively new, still misses a few features in comparison with the Java/Scala option
    • Steep Learning Curve, it's documentation could be improved to something more user-friendly, and it could also discuss more theoretical concepts than just coding
    • Community smaller than other frameworks
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    EVAM
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Apache
    Apache Spark is more user-friendly and features higher-level APIs. However, it was initially built for batch processing and only more recently gained streaming capabilities. In contrast, Apache Flink processes streaming data natively. Therefore, in terms of low latency and fault tolerance, Apache Flink takes the lead. However, Spark has a larger community and a decidedly lower learning curve.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    EVAM
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Apache
    • Allowed for real-time data recovery, adding significant value to the busines
    • Enabled us to create new internal tools that we couldn't find in the market, becoming a strategic asset for the business
    • Enhanced the overall technical capability of the team
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    EVAM
    No answers on this topic
    ScreenShots