Apache Flink vs. Evam Continuous Intelligence Platform

In well-suited scenarios, I would recommend using Apache Flink when you need to perform real-time analytics on streaming data, such as monitoring user activities, analyzing IoT device data, or processing financial transactions in real-time. It is also a good choice in scenarios where fault tolerance and consistency are crucial. I would not recommend it for simple batch processing pipelines or for teams that aren't experienced, as it might be overkill, and the steep learning curve may not justify the investment.

Incentivized

• Low latency Stream Processing, enabling real-time analytics
• Scalability, due its great parallel capabilities
• Stateful Processing, providing several built-in fault tolerance systems
• Flexibility, supporting both batch and stream processing

Incentivized

• Python/SQL API, since both are relatively new, still misses a few features in comparison with the Java/Scala option
• Steep Learning Curve, it's documentation could be improved to something more user-friendly, and it could also discuss more theoretical concepts than just coding
• Community smaller than other frameworks

Incentivized

Apache Spark is more user-friendly and features higher-level APIs. However, it was initially built for batch processing and only more recently gained streaming capabilities. In contrast, Apache Flink processes streaming data natively. Therefore, in terms of low latency and fault tolerance, Apache Flink takes the lead. However, Spark has a larger community and a decidedly lower learning curve.

Incentivized

• Allowed for real-time data recovery, adding significant value to the busines
• Enabled us to create new internal tools that we couldn't find in the market, becoming a strategic asset for the business
• Enhanced the overall technical capability of the team

Incentivized