TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Apache Maven

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/AApache Maven is an open source build automation tool.N/A

    Gradle Build Tool (Open Source)

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AGradle is an open source build system. Gradle boasts a rich API and mature ecosystem of plugins and integrations to support automation. Users can model, integrate and systematize the delivery of software from end to end.

    $0

    per month

    Pricing
    Apache MavenGradle Build Tool (Open Source)
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Apache MavenGradle Build Tool (Open Source)
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Apache MavenGradle Build Tool (Open Source)
    Considered Both Products
    Apache
    Chose Apache Maven
    Have evaluated and used Gradle for dependency management and build tool automation. Gradle scores well in performance, compared over with Maven.
    Incentivized
    Chose Apache Maven
    Maven was chosen out of convention as a static build tool. Personally, I prefer Gradle's less verbose syntax and modularity. Same with Bazel and Sbt.
    Incentivized
    Chose Apache Maven
    Maven vs Gradle

    • Maven is much more mature vs Gradle and been around for a long time. Easy to get developers. Gradle is new but adoption is fast
    Incentivized
    Open Source
    Chose Gradle Build Tool (Open Source)
    No more ugly XML-s. Custom tasks
    Incentivized
    Chose Gradle Build Tool (Open Source)
    [Gradle is] a more modern version of open source build tools like Ant and Maven. Whereas the build config was XML files which were tedious and error prone, the modern DSL usage of Groovy to write these build files is a
    Incentivized
    Chose Gradle Build Tool (Open Source)
    Gradle is good and matches well against market leader Maven with its ease of use, ease of migration from Maven to Gradle and also coding like configuration unlike the XML configuration of Maven
    Incentivized
    Chose Gradle Build Tool (Open Source)
    Gradle performs better than both Ant and Maven. Dependency handling is very easy to use.
    Incentivized
    Chose Gradle Build Tool (Open Source)
    Maven is a much more mature build tool. The community behind maven plugins has continued to grow over time, and there are several mature products that continue to receive support. Gradle can use some of these features, but appears to be losing steam over time. The effort to …
    Incentivized
    Chose Gradle Build Tool (Open Source)
    SBT works fine for Scala but when I tried to use it with Java it was hard to configure and I gave up. Maven is awesome but the pom.xml file tends to be really big which makes it hard to read. Grunt is suitable only for js projects.
    Incentivized
    Chose Gradle Build Tool (Open Source)
    Gradle is easier to read, has lots of plugins, and can be extended easily.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    8 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    7 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    8 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    7 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    8 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    7 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    7 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    8 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    7 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    Apache MavenGradle Build Tool (Open Source)
    Small Businesses
    CloudBees Codeship
    Score9 out of 10
    Apache Maven
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Gradle Build Tool (Open Source)
    Score9 out of 10
    Apache Maven
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Gradle Build Tool (Open Source)
    Score9 out of 10
    Azure Pipelines
    Score8.5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Apache MavenGradle Build Tool (Open Source)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (15 ratings)
    9.0
    (12 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    3.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    5.1
    (3 ratings)
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Apache MavenGradle Build Tool (Open Source)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Apache
    Maven is great if you have an application with a lot of third-party dependencies and don’t want each developer to keep track of where the dependency can be downloaded. It’s also a great way to make it easy for a new developer to be able to build the application. It’s less suitable for simple projects without any third-party dependencies.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    Gradle Build Tool is more suitable with the Java projects. It has helped us to automate the build part of the devops cycle. Its configuration and Groovy script is really easy to understand and can be implemented with ease. It can be used both for automation and manual buids of the projects. Gradle Build Tool is easy to use and easy to integrate.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Apache
    • If you are building in the Java ecosystem, then Maven definitely has the biggest repository of artifacts needed for such projects.
    • It has a very simple to use extendable architecture. Everything is configurable through the Pom.xml file which is very simple to follow.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Gradle's methods to manipulate files is very flexible. It minimizes the amount of code one has to write to copy, move, or expand zip or tar files.
    • Gradle uses Groovy, which is a Java like language. This allows for most computer engineers to come up to speed fairly quickly, for writing or maintaining gradle code.
    • Gradle also supports DSL (Domain Specific Language), which is based on Groovy. The DSL language allows engineers to automate build jobs that otherwise could be very cumbersome to maintain or modify.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Apache
    • Maven provides a very rigid model that makes customization tedious and sometimes impossible. While this can make it easier to understand any given Maven build, as long as you don’t have any special requirements, it also makes it unsuitable for many automation problems.
    • Maven has few, built-in dependency scopes, which forces awkward module architectures in common scenarios like using test fixtures or code generation. There is no separation between unit and integration tests
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • I'd like to see a way to specify how to run only certain tests in parallel, I tried this feature and for tests that involve interaction with SQL Databases sometimes I can't because of deadlocks.
    • Not sure if there is something else, gradle has been working really good for us and they are adding improvements all the time which is awesome. I used to think the performance is a deal but the latest versions are addressing this issue very well
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Apache
    The overall usability of Apache Maven is very good to us. We were able to incorporate it into our company's build process pretty quickly. We deployed it to multiple teams throughout the entire enterprise. We got good feedback from our developers stating that Apache Maven has simplified their build process. It also allowed to to standardize the build process for the entire enterprise, thus ensure that each development team is using the same, consistent process to build code.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    Gradle's language construct is good
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Apache
    No answers on this topic
    Open Source
    I have tried to use Gradle for projects several times in the past, but there is just so much work in maintaining the build file that it quickly becomes untenable. I have been using Maven for many years, and even though the build file can be complex, it works without maintenance between releases.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Apache
    I can't speak to the support, as I've never had issues. Apache Maven "just works," and errors were user errors or local nexus errors. Apache Maven is a great build/dependency management tool. I give it a 9/10 because occasionally the error message don't immediately indicate a solution...but again, those errors were always user or configuration errors, and the Maven documentation is extensive, so I don't find fault in Maven, but in its users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    Gradle has been an excellent tool for Android development. It has helped us create multiple versions of the app for different environments. It also takes care of all the packaging needs in the background without having to write all the code related to that. It is a no brainer to use Gradle with Android applications.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Apache
    Ant, Maven's opposing framework, is often a point of comparison. Although Ant does not require formal conventions, it is procedural in the sense that you must tell Ant exactly what to do and when. It also lacks a lifecycle, along with goal definition and dependencies. Maven, on the other hand, requires less work as it knows exactly where your source code is as long as the pom.xml file is generated.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    [Gradle is] a more modern version of open source build tools like Ant and Maven.
    Whereas the build config was XML files which were tedious and error
    prone, the modern DSL usage of Groovy to write these build files is a
    great advancement. Also these config files can be inherited from top
    level to each associated project.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Apache
    • It was very handy to roll out organization level frameworks to be used by diverse departments and business
    • Consistent build artifacts enabling smooth release cycles, thereby enabling to adhere to release calendars and feature rollouts
    • Reduced 80 man hours of work every release cycle
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • In a distributed development environment, once we established a strong CI/CD model, Gradle proved to be a great choice to automate the various processes. Gradle also provides much flexibility, which is essential in today's development environment. The important benefit is that the CI/CD engineers can support development's needs quickly and reliably. This in turn supports faster testing and deployment, which generates higher ROI.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots