TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Apache Spark Streaming

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AApache Spark Streaming is a scalable fault-tolerant streaming processing system that natively supports both batch and streaming workloads.N/A

    IBM Confluent

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/AIBM Confluent helps enterprises stream, connect, process, govern and serve real-time data across hybrid environments.

    $385

    per month

    Pricing
    Apache Spark StreamingIBM Confluent
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Basic
    $0
    Standard
    Starting at ~$385
    per month
    Enterprise
    Starting at ~$1,150
    per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Apache Spark StreamingIBM Confluent
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—Confluent monthly bills are based upon resource consumption, i.e., you are only charged for the resources you use when you actually use them: Stream: Kafka clusters are billed for eCKUs/CKUs ($/hour), networking ($/GB), and storage ($/GB-hour). Connect: Use of connectors is billed based on throughput ($/GB) and a task base price ($/task/hour). Process: Use of stream processing with Confluent Cloud for Apache Flink is calculated based on CFUs ($/minute). Govern: Use of Stream Governance is billed based on environment ($/hour). Confluent storage and throughput is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB). Please also note that all prices are stated in United States Dollars unless specifically stated otherwise. All billing computations are conducted in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Apache Spark StreamingIBM Confluent
    Considered Both Products
    Apache
    No answer on this topic
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    94%
    Would buy again
    17 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    14 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    94%
    Happy with the feature set
    17 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    86%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    12 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    88%
    Implementation went as expected
    15 Answers
    Features
    Apache Spark StreamingIBM Confluent
    Streaming Analytics
    Comparison of Streaming Analytics features of Apache Spark Streaming and IBM Confluent
    Feature
    Apache Spark Streaming
    8.4
    1 Ratings
    7% above category average
    IBM Confluent
    -
    Ratings
    Real-Time Data Analysis8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Visualization Dashboards9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Ingestion from Multiple Data Sources9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Low Latency8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrated Development Tools8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data wrangling and preparation8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Linear Scale-Out8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Machine Learning Automation9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Enrichment9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Apache Spark StreamingIBM Confluent
    Small Businesses
    Amazon Kinesis
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Amazon SNS
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    Amazon SNS
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Spotfire Streaming
    Score5 out of 10
    Google Cloud Pub/Sub
    Score8.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Apache Spark StreamingIBM Confluent
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.6
    (18 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.4
    (16 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Apache Spark StreamingIBM Confluent
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Apache
    Apache Spark Streaming is a tool that we are using for almost a year and is excellent in managing batch processing. It is user-friendly. Using it, we can even process our massive data in fractions of seconds. Its pricing is its other plus point. Only its In-memory processing is its demerit as it occupies a large memory.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    Very reliable product and help with streaming messages without fail which is a significant confidence booster as an SRE leader. Would recommend the product considering the fact that now it is backed by IBM in addition to all IBM Confluent was doing well before the acquisition. Has been a game changer for our organization
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Apache
    • It is amazing in solving complicated transformative logic.
    • It is straightforward to program.
    • It is a very quick tool.
    • It processes large data within a fraction of seconds.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • It works really well in providing data context for our customers.
    • It is helpful in real time data streaming.
    • It is really wonderful tool for doing data validations and massaging the data.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Apache
    • There must be more documentation.
    • It is a profoundly complex tool.
    • Its in-memory processing consumes massive memory.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Iit needs to improve in AI agents usage.
    • It needs to be more user friendly.
    • It is too complicated for beginners.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Apache
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    Kafka and Schema Registry are the rock solid fully managed offerings from IBM Confluent Cloud. Other than that the rest of the offerings do not work as expected.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Apache
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    The support from the Confluent platform is great and satisfying. We have been working with Confluent for more than a year now. They sent out resident architects to help us set up Confluent cluster on our cloud and help us troubleshoot problems we have encountered. Overall, it has been a great experience working with the Confluent Platform.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Apache
    Apache Spark Streaming stands above all the huge data transformative tools because of its speed of processing which was quite slow in Presto as it takes a lot of our time in the data processing. Spark, comfortably provides integration with Jupyter like notebook environment. and Spark's combination with Jupyter and Python results in enhancing the speed .
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    For our use case it was very important that the technology we were working with fit into our Azure architecture, and met our data processing size requirements to stream data within certain SLAs. Confluent more than met our performance requirements and compared to the others scale options and cost to run it was more than financially viable as a platform solution to our global operations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Apache
    • Cost and time-effective tool for our business.
    • We can integrate with Jupyter with many conveniences.
    • Its high-speed data processing has proved beneficial for us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • IBM Confluent helps us get data moving from system to system at near real time.
    • IBM Confluent makes pushing data into a data lake easy - analytics, targeted deals, etc
    • The RBAC and ACL setup helps us govern and secure our data, even between teams/applications.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots