TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Apache Sqoop (discontinued)

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/AApache Sqoop is a discontinued open-source command-line tool for bulk data transfer between Apache Hadoop and structured data stores. It was commonly used to import relational database tables or mainframe datasets into HDFS for processing with Hadoop tools, then export processed data back to a relational database.N/A

    IBM Confluent

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/AIBM Confluent helps enterprises stream, connect, process, govern and serve real-time data across hybrid environments.

    $385

    per month

    Pricing
    Apache Sqoop (discontinued)IBM Confluent
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Basic
    $0
    Standard
    Starting at ~$385
    per month
    Enterprise
    Starting at ~$1,150
    per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Apache Sqoop (discontinued)IBM Confluent
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—Confluent monthly bills are based upon resource consumption, i.e., you are only charged for the resources you use when you actually use them: Stream: Kafka clusters are billed for eCKUs/CKUs ($/hour), networking ($/GB), and storage ($/GB-hour). Connect: Use of connectors is billed based on throughput ($/GB) and a task base price ($/task/hour). Process: Use of stream processing with Confluent Cloud for Apache Flink is calculated based on CFUs ($/minute). Govern: Use of Stream Governance is billed based on environment ($/hour). Confluent storage and throughput is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB). Please also note that all prices are stated in United States Dollars unless specifically stated otherwise. All billing computations are conducted in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Apache Sqoop (discontinued)IBM Confluent
    Considered Both Products
    Apache
    No answer on this topic
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    94%
    Would buy again
    17 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    14 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    94%
    Happy with the feature set
    17 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    86%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    12 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    88%
    Implementation went as expected
    15 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    Apache Sqoop (discontinued)IBM Confluent
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Amazon SNS
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Apache Spark
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Amazon SNS
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Apache Spark
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Google Cloud Pub/Sub
    Score8.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Apache Sqoop (discontinued)IBM Confluent
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.6
    (18 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.4
    (16 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Apache Sqoop (discontinued)IBM Confluent
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Apache
    Sqoop is great for sending data between a JDBC compliant database and a Hadoop environment. Sqoop is built for those who need a few simple CLI options to import a selection of database tables into Hadoop, do large dataset analysis that could not commonly be done with that database system due to resource constraints, then export the results back into that database (or another). Sqoop falls short when there needs to be some extra, customized processing between database extract, and Hadoop loading, in which case Apache Spark's JDBC utilities might be preferred
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    Very reliable product and help with streaming messages without fail which is a significant confidence booster as an SRE leader. Would recommend the product considering the fact that now it is backed by IBM in addition to all IBM Confluent was doing well before the acquisition. Has been a game changer for our organization
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Apache
    • Provides generalized JDBC extensions to migrate data between most database systems
    • Generates Java classes upon reading database records for use in other code utilizing Hadoop's client libraries
    • Allows for both import and export features
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • It works really well in providing data context for our customers.
    • It is helpful in real time data streaming.
    • It is really wonderful tool for doing data validations and massaging the data.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Apache
    • Sqoop2 development seems to have stalled. I have set it up outside of a Cloudera CDH installation, and I actually prefer it's "Sqoop Server" model better than just the CLI client version that is Sqoop1. This works especially well in a microservices environment, where there would be only one place to maintain the JDBC drivers to use for Sqoop.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Iit needs to improve in AI agents usage.
    • It needs to be more user friendly.
    • It is too complicated for beginners.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Apache
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    Kafka and Schema Registry are the rock solid fully managed offerings from IBM Confluent Cloud. Other than that the rest of the offerings do not work as expected.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Apache
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    The support from the Confluent platform is great and satisfying. We have been working with Confluent for more than a year now. They sent out resident architects to help us set up Confluent cluster on our cloud and help us troubleshoot problems we have encountered. Overall, it has been a great experience working with the Confluent Platform.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Apache
    • Sqoop comes preinstalled on the major Hadoop vendor distributions as the recommended product to import data from relational databases. The ability to extend it with additional JDBC drivers makes it very flexible for the environment it is installed within.
    • Spark also has a useful JDBC reader, and can manipulate data in more ways than Sqoop, and also upload to many other systems than just Hadoop.
    • Kafka Connect JDBC is more for streaming database updates using tools such as Oracle GoldenGate or Debezium.
    • Streamsets and Apache NiFi both provide a more "flow based programming" approach to graphically laying out connectors between various systems, including JDBC and Hadoop.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    For our use case it was very important that the technology we were working with fit into our Azure architecture, and met our data processing size requirements to stream data within certain SLAs. Confluent more than met our performance requirements and compared to the others scale options and cost to run it was more than financially viable as a platform solution to our global operations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Apache
    • When combined with Cloudera's HUE, it can enable non-technical users to easily import relational data into Hadoop.
    • Being able to manipulate large datasets in Hadoop, and them load them into a type of "materialized view" in an external database system has yielded great insights into the Hadoop datalake without continuously running large batch jobs.
    • Sqoop isn't very user-friendly for those uncomfortable with a CLI.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • IBM Confluent helps us get data moving from system to system at near real time.
    • IBM Confluent makes pushing data into a data lake easy - analytics, targeted deals, etc
    • The RBAC and ACL setup helps us govern and secure our data, even between teams/applications.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots