TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Apache Tomcat

    Score7.9 out of 10
    N/ATomcat is an open-source web server supported by Apache.N/A

    Codefresh

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/ACodefresh is a continuous integration/delivery and automation platform for Kubernetes that allows users to build, test, deploy and gather feedback on apps, from Octopus Deploy.N/A
    Pricing
    Apache TomcatCodefresh
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Apache TomcatCodefresh
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Apache TomcatCodefresh
    Considered Both Products
    Apache
    No answer on this topic
    Octopus Deploy
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Apache TomcatCodefresh
    Application Servers
    Comparison of Application Servers features of Apache Tomcat and Codefresh
    Feature
    Apache Tomcat
    9.2
    24 Ratings
    15% above category average
    Codefresh
    -
    Ratings
    IDE support10.022 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security management9.024 Ratings00 Ratings
    Administration and management8.224 Ratings00 Ratings
    Application server performance8.124 Ratings00 Ratings
    Installation10.024 Ratings00 Ratings
    Open-source standards compliance10.024 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Apache TomcatCodefresh
    Small Businesses
    NGINX
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Octopus Deploy
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Oracle WebLogic Server
    Score7.3 out of 10
    Octopus Deploy
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    NGINX
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Octopus Deploy
    Score8.7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Apache TomcatCodefresh
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (24 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Apache TomcatCodefresh
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Apache
    Excellent value for companies wishing to host Java applications in the cloud. Utilizing hosting tools such as load balancers and network and application firewalls, Tomcat can be part of a powerful system to host web applications to thousands of users. There has been consistency in the development and support of Tomcat since its initial release in the late '90s and the best commonalities have been carried forward. If you host Java web applications, Tomcat is as good as any for an application server.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Octopus Deploy
    While deploying docker images on kubernetes pods I must say Codefresh helped me a lot. It has made my work easy as an Automation tool. I can setup a simple pipelines to automate my build for kubernetes. but for more complex pipelines Codefresh need some improvement
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Apache
    • Fast to start up, which is useful when we need to just check that our changes are working correctly.
    • Free, which allows us to not be involved with the finance/legal team about using it.
    • Bundled with Spring Boot, which makes it even more convenient for our testing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Octopus Deploy
    • Continuous Integration and Continuous Development. we can setup jobs that automatically triggered when there is any changes in code and starts building up the build images automatically and then pushing images to Container Registry
    • We can involve Version control system like github, bitbucket, gitlab etc for integration of Codefresh with our code stored in these Version control systems.
    • On the failure of any jobs/pipeline Codefresh can also send Notification on our email.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Apache
    • Using tomcat manager to troubleshoot is not very informative. Error messages are vague, you have to dig into log files for more information about the problems.
    • Is great for simple web applications, but may not work for heavy development which may require a full J2EE stack, might like JBoss better.
    • Security in tomcat is not straightforward, as I discovered that you have to understand how to set up realms in tomcat in order to hash passwords, which I was not overly familiar with, which is a big deal when setting up users in the tomcat-users.xml file.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Octopus Deploy
    • With Codefresh it's become hard to handle complex pipelines
    • Need to focus more on Documentation part
    • UI can be more attractive
    • Security can be more increased
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Apache
    We have a huge knowledge of the product within our company and we're satisfied with the performance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Octopus Deploy
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Apache
    Tomcat has a very rich API set which allows us to implement our automation script to trigger the deployment, configure, stop and start Tomcat from the command line. In our projects, we embedded Tomcat in our Eclipse in all of the developer's machines so they could quickly verify their code with little effort, Azure Webapp has strong support for Tomcat so we could move our application to Azure cloud very easy. One drawback is Tomcat UI quite poorly features but we almost do not use it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Octopus Deploy
    No answers on this topic
    Reliability and Availability
    Apache
    Tomcat doesn't have a built-in watchdog that ensures restart upon failure, so you have to provide it externally. A very good solution is java service wrapper. The community edition is able to restart Tomcat upon out of memories exceptions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Octopus Deploy
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Apache
    Tomcat support to customize memory used and allow us to define the Connection pool and thread pool to increase system performance and availability, Tomcat server itself consume very little memory and almost no footprint. We use Tomcat in our production environment which has up to thousands of concurrent users and it is stable and provides a quick response.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Octopus Deploy
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Apache
    Well, in actuality, I have never needed support for Apache Tomcat since it is configured and ready-to-go with no configuration needed on my end.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Octopus Deploy
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Apache
    Eclipse Jetty is the best alternative for Apache Tomcat because which is also an open-source and lightweight servlet container like Tomcat. A major advantage of this over Tomcat is that Jetty server can easily be embedded with the source code of web applications. Since it requires less memory to operate, you may realize that it is very efficient.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Octopus Deploy
    It's very scalable It is cost effective It easily get integrated with third party tools It easily get integrated with Kubernetes Docker.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Apache
    It's very easy to add instances to an existing deployment and, using apache with mod proxy balancer, to scale up the serving farm
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Octopus Deploy
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Apache
    • Tomcat is cheap and very quick to deploy, so it has benefited much when situation needs applications to be deployed quickly without wasting time on licensing and installations.
    • Plenty of documentation available so no vendor training is required. Support contract is not needed as well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Octopus Deploy
    • Positive:
    • As an Automation tools I must say it has reduced manual labour , reduced errors and improved quality of work.
    • It easily get integrated with third party tools which increases ease ness in our work
    • Negative:
    • Although being a very good tools in CI/CD
    • It requires improvement in UI, it's speed, security, optimization.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots