Apache Tomcat vs. Hudson CI (discontinued)
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Apache Tomcat | Score7.9 out of 10 | N/A | Apache Tomcat (developed by The Apache Software Foundation) is an open-source Java web application server and servlet container released under the Apache License version 2.0. Tomcat provides an execution environment and web server for hosting Java-based web applications, implementing core Jakarta EE (formerly Java EE) web specifications including Jakarta Servlet, Jakarta Pages (JSP), Jakarta Expression Language (EL), Jakarta WebSocket, Jakarta Annotations, and Jakarta Authentication. | N/A |
Hudson CI (discontinued) | Score4 out of 10 | N/A | Oracle acquired and then supported Hudson Continuous Integration through 2016. Oracle no longer updates or supports Hudson. It was available free and open source under an MIT license, but it is no longer being developed, and is no longer available. | $0 per month |
| Apache Tomcat | Hudson CI (discontinued) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Apache Tomcat | Hudson CI (discontinued) | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | ![]() No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 8 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 8 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 8 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 6 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 8 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Apache Tomcat | Hudson CI (discontinued) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Servers |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Apache Tomcat | Hudson CI (discontinued) | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | NGINX Score9.1 out of 10 | Apache Maven Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Oracle WebLogic Server Score7.2 out of 10 | Apache Maven Score9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | NGINX Score9.1 out of 10 | Gradle Build Tool (Open Source) Score9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Apache Tomcat | Hudson CI (discontinued) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | - |
| Usability | 8.0 | - |
| Availability | 6.0 | - |
| Performance | 9.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 9.1 | - |
| Configurability | 8.0 | - |
| Ease of integration | 9.0 | - |
| Product Scalability | 9.0 | - |
| Apache Tomcat | Hudson CI (discontinued) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]()
|
|
| Pros | ![]()
|
|
| Cons | ![]()
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered | ![]()
|
|
| Scalability | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment | ![]()
|
|
| ScreenShots |



