TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Appium

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/AN/AN/A

    Tuskr

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/ATuskr is a cloud-based test management software. Users can manage test cases, conduct test runs and integrate with bug and time tracking tools. Tuskr is available via a free plan, and with a 30-day free trial of paid tier features.

    $45

    per month 5 users (minimum)

    Pricing
    AppiumTuskr
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Team
    $9
    per month per user
    Business
    $15
    per month per user
    Enterprise
    $29
    per month per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AppiumTuskr
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details16% discount for annual pricing.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    AppiumTuskr
    Considered Both Products
    JS Foundation
    No answer on this topic
    Celoxis
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    26 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    24 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    26 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    21 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    22 Answers
    Features
    AppiumTuskr
    Test Management
    Comparison of Test Management features of Appium and Tuskr
    Feature
    Appium
    -
    Ratings
    Tuskr
    9.7
    25 Ratings
    18% above category average
    Centralized test management00 Ratings10.024 Ratings
    Test execution reporting00 Ratings9.425 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    AppiumTuskr
    Small Businesses
    Swiftify
    Score9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Xamarin
    Score6 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Swiftify
    Score9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    AppiumTuskr
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (10 ratings)
    9.4
    (26 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.2
    (5 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    AppiumTuskr
    Likelihood to Recommend
    JS Foundation
    1. It's open source which supports range of languages, operating systems and languages. Well suited for Android and IOS mobile automation. Supports all kinds of apps, which makes it flexible and robust mobile testing tool 2. It is less appropriate where we need intercept network call to verify the API calls. Extensive coding experience is required to work Appium
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Celoxis
    Tuskr works well for teams that want a straightforward test management solution without a steep learning curve. It's especially useful for Agile projects where frequent testing and collaboration are important. Teams looking for extensive enterprise-level customization or highly advanced reporting may find some limitations, but for day-to-day QA management, it performs very well.
    Read full review
    Pros
    JS Foundation
    • It uses WebDriver API so it makes it easy to use for former web test automation engineers.
    • It can be managed via the command line via an extensive set of parameters.
    • It handles implicit waits at the server side that is especially valuable in distributed infrastructure.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Celoxis
    • Its easy to import test cases in Tuskr by using the csv import feature
    • Test runs are easy to create and can include test cases from multiple suits.
    • Reports of test runs make it easier to track all the cases that were covered at a particular instance before giving a release signoff.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    JS Foundation
    • Element browser sometimes is unreliable and has sporadic fails.
    • Appium running is a bit slow, compared to tests written with Appium and with Espresso or XCTest.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Celoxis
    • When you click into a specific test, the status automatically clears. it would be nice for this to be preserved when clicking in instead of clearing
    • It would be nice to be able to add comments specific to certain steps in each test, instead of just one big comment box
    • Since we use Tuskr for QA, we structure it as a table with instructions and expected results. because these are side by side, sometimes it is hard to go in a step-by-step order when there are multiple QA steps to take to complete the test.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    JS Foundation
    I am rating 10/10 because Appium can use with multiple programming languages with multiple Test engines. Also, it works for both Android and iOS.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Celoxis
    Tuskr suits our organization needs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    JS Foundation
    I would like to give 9/10 rating to Appium because of it can easily integrate with popular frameworks and CI/CD tools, as well as it is reliable, flexible and easy to use. The setup can bit complex in initial step, but once on configured it's very easy to use and enables stable and scalable mobile automation for real and cloud devices.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Celoxis
    The Tuskr App, overall rating depends on its easeiest way to use as their features and managment tool are too good. If you need a easier tool and cost-effective tool and a lot of feature in it. and its return of investment is very good. And the software is really ease to adapt
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    JS Foundation
    If you're an Apple developer, you use Xcode. It's practically a forced necessity. For system testing though, it doesn't have to be. You can have your development team focus on unit and integration tests in their platform and another team automate acceptance tests with a language they are more familiar with.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Celoxis
    I have not worked with related testing suite before but Tuskr has been the favorite platform for running test suites. It has generated positive leads from the company data by offering the necessary testing support. It is easy to integrate with other applications to suit business demands. The system generate results from various testing suites that can shared with our clients.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    JS Foundation
    • Appium is open source, so it's free. That's budget friendly right there.
    • The ability to write mobile automation tests has saved considerable time for our manual test team, but that is true with most automation tests.
    • We use Sauce Labs with our other automation, but Appium works great with Sauce Labs, as well, if I needed to run on emulators and simulators.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Celoxis
    • Everyone in the team can go and read how to perform a specific test and note down the result of it which can be viewed by anyone
    • We can filter based on results understanding what test cases are failing from previous runs
    • Helps save a lot of time, effort and minimises future issues
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Tuskr Screenshots

    Screenshot of Progress MonitoringScreenshot of Create Flexible test casesScreenshot of Distribute Workload