Tuskr

Tuskr

24 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Tuskr	Score 9.7 out of 10	N/A	Tuskr is a cloud-based test management software. Users can manage test cases, conduct test runs and integrate with bug and time tracking tools. Tuskr is available via a free plan, and with a 30-day free trial of paid tier features.	$45 per month 5 users (minimum)

Pricing

Tuskr

Editions & Modules

Team: $9
per month per user
Business: $15
per month per user
Enterprise: $29
per month per user

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Tuskr
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

16% discount for annual pricing.

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Tuskr
Considered Both Products	Tuskr Verified User Engineer Chose Tuskr Haven't used any similar products Incentivized Helpful? MR Mizanur Rahman QA Admin Chose Tuskr For our company, we use Tuskr for software testing. It's a good tool to run software test cases easily. We are mainly using it to save time and for Smoke & Regression Tests. It's very simple to add test cases and also to run any tests. Features are easy to understand. Incentivized Helpful? JN Jashwini NJ SDET Chose Tuskr Selected Tuskr because we can add test cases of different projects under one tool. We can add different test run and we can use show the test execution report and also it can be integrated with different tools like GitHub,Jira ,Slack and many more. Test cast case management … Incentivized Helpful? Felicia Bently Business Analyst Chose Tuskr I have not worked with related testing suite before but Tuskr has been the favorite platform for running test suites. It has generated positive leads from the company data by offering the necessary testing support. It is easy to integrate with other applications to suit … Helpful? Courtney Plaizier Software Engineer Chose Tuskr Tuskr is the suitable product that I have used to run test cases. The cost of deployment and maintenance is efficient for both small and large scale business enterprises. The dashboards have unique interface that displays project progress. The data management provides charts … Incentivized Helpful? Dominic Clawson Project Manager Chose Tuskr Tuskr has introduced best approach of test cases that used to give us problems. I have not worked with similar testing tool before but our center of interest in test cases have been solved by Tuskr. It has full package for carrying out all the test tasks that operates across … Incentivized Helpful? Prajwal Aher Quality Assurance Engineer Chose Tuskr Its very difficult to maintain test cases on Google Sheets as compared to Tuskr which has test suites and sections to organize the test cases. Also there are no test runs in Google Sheets to keep a track of the progress while testing. Incentivized Helpful? JF Jan Figura QA Lead Engineer Chose Tuskr Its more scalable can be more tailored to the needs of the team Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Engineer Chose Tuskr Tuskr has better visual representations and is much easier to setup and use compared to other platforms Incentivized Helpful? MH Michael Hedman Platform Engineering Manager Chose Tuskr So far I prefer Tuskr over TestRail. I haven't explored everything, but Tuskr seems more modern, and more refined. While there are still issues to be resolved, TestRail was expensive, and their payment philosophy left a lot to be desired. Incentivized Helpful? AY Anvesh Reddy Yeruva Senior Test Engineer Chose Tuskr Inexpensive providing same level of features. Covers all our necessary requirements in test management. Made my task easy in familiarising the test plan to my juniors. Simple to use UI is easy to understand and does not require much knowledge sharing. One of the best customer … Incentivized Helpful? Duc Minh Nguyen President Chose Tuskr Overall, I'd say that Tuskr has a much nicer interface than Jenkins, it does a great job to show your test results and additional information regarding it (errors, warnings, etc...). Even though it does take time to learn how to use the software, it is somewhat easier to learn … Incentivized Helpful?
Top Pros	Pro Test cases Pro New versions Pro Test runs
Top Cons	Minus Mobile app Minus Advanced reporting

Features

Tuskr

Test Management

Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
	Tuskr 9.7 20 Ratings 19% above category average
Centralized test management	9.819 Ratings
Test execution reporting	9.720 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Tuskr
Small Businesses	BrowserStack Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	OpenText ALM/Quality Center Score 7.7 out of 10
Enterprises	OpenText ALM/Quality Center Score 7.7 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Tuskr
Likelihood to Recommend	9.9 (21 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	8.2 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Tuskr
Likelihood to Recommend	Celoxis Customizing fields and sorting make test case management easy to handle. The TCM's swift menu adjustments and dynamic graphs enhance the user experience, making it a delight to use.Few points which I do not dislike as such but can be improved. One is the ability to write longer tests. Another thing is that the UI when it comes to modifications like adding a new field, editing a field, etc requires few clicks and the path is slightly ambiguous. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Celoxis Its easy to import test cases in Tuskr by using the csv import feature Test runs are easy to create and can include test cases from multiple suits. Reports of test runs make it easier to track all the cases that were covered at a particular instance before giving a release signoff. Incentivized Prajwal Aher Quality Assurance Engineer Read full review
Cons	Celoxis When you click into a specific test, the status automatically clears. it would be nice for this to be preserved when clicking in instead of clearing It would be nice to be able to add comments specific to certain steps in each test, instead of just one big comment box Since we use Tuskr for QA, we structure it as a table with instructions and expected results. because these are side by side, sometimes it is hard to go in a step-by-step order when there are multiple QA steps to take to complete the test. Incentivized JK Jessica Kloss Product Analyst Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	Celoxis Tuskr suits our organization needs Incentivized JF Jan Figura QA Lead Engineer Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Celoxis I have not worked with related testing suite before but Tuskr has been the favorite platform for running test suites. It has generated positive leads from the company data by offering the necessary testing support. It is easy to integrate with other applications to suit business demands. The system generate results from various testing suites that can shared with our clients. Felicia Bently Business Analyst Read full review
Return on Investment	Celoxis Make the process to create tests a lot smoother, so increase production value by reducing bugs released to customers. Learning curves hinders some progress at the beginning. Pricing is great for a small team, worth it with 30 days trial as well. Incentivized Duc Minh Nguyen President Read full review
ScreenShots	Tuskr Screenshots