Apple ARKit vs. Banuba Face AR SDK

Apple ARKit is best where AR experience will enhance user understanding of the product. For instance, for a furniture app, AR via Apple ARKit can help users get an understanding of how the furniture will look. It also works well for use cases where we want to give human movement as an input for AR, so for instance for clothing apps that want users to see how they will look in a particular clothing style, etc.

Incentivized

I would recommend using this cool SDK to try out different Face Filter which also allows you to create your own interactive filters. As it provides a free trial for organizations, that one should try it once.

Incentivized

• Great sync between hardware and software
• Visual-inertial odometry with ARKit2 is the best.

Incentivized

• Create an engaging and customized AR experiences
• Enables high quality filter
• Enables us to create 3D animation and modeling
• Enables 2D and 3D asset creation with rich asset store
• Accurate Face tracking with skin beautification

Incentivized

• At times it can be laggy, taking time to recognize things
• Limited to iOS

Incentivized

• Training documentation may be provided, to use it effectively
• Some improvement needed for Android SDK, as you need minimum requirement.

Incentivized

They are always proactive, instead of us getting to them about a problem or a new feature. Always quick to respond any time of the day. Hence, 10/10.

Incentivized

Apple ARKit is way finer and is the best option for iOS.

Incentivized

Incentivized

• It improved user retention.
• It increased the app size, which is a drawback.

Incentivized

• Engages the users through its creative designing
• Enables 2x increase on user engagement

Incentivized