Apple ARKit vs. EasyAR

Apple ARKit is best where AR experience will enhance user understanding of the product. For instance, for a furniture app, AR via Apple ARKit can help users get an understanding of how the furniture will look. It also works well for use cases where we want to give human movement as an input for AR, so for instance for clothing apps that want users to see how they will look in a particular clothing style, etc.

Incentivized

It is well suited in scenarios like you wants to track objects and surface in the plane. Image recognization at multiple targets is one of the very good functionalities of EasyAR. And if you want to render 3d objects in your mobile application then it's well suited. It is free too so you can create applications at minimal costs.

Incentivized

• Great sync between hardware and software
• Visual-inertial odometry with ARKit2 is the best.

Incentivized

• Object tracking
• Surface tracking
• Camera supports
• Recoding

Incentivized

• At times it can be laggy, taking time to recognize things
• Limited to iOS

Incentivized

• In some cases, it took more time recognize a object in dark
• Slow support for new features
• Sometimes take time to load render object

Incentivized

They are always proactive, instead of us getting to them about a problem or a new feature. Always quick to respond any time of the day. Hence, 10/10.

Incentivized

Apple ARKit is way finer and is the best option for iOS.

Incentivized

EasyAr is free and there is no watermark on the output of it. It's easy to use and some features like multiple targeting in images and object and surface tracking help you to achieve what you want.

Incentivized

• It improved user retention.
• It increased the app size, which is a drawback.

Incentivized

• Its free to use so we created app on low cost
• Easy to use so we achieve deadline on time

Incentivized