TrustRadius

AFT Fathom vs. gINT

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AFT Fathom
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
AFT's Fathom product is a hydraulic flow analysis software for engineers working with liquid and low-velocity gas piping systems.
$5,100
gINT
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
Bentley Systems offers gINT, a set of applications that generate and present subsurface data for mining and other purposes.N/A
Pricing
AFT FathomgINT
Editions & Modules
Stand alone License
$5,100
Network License
$7,650
per seat
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AFT FathomgINT
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AFT FathomgINT
Considered Both Products
AFT Fathom

No answer on this topic

gINT
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose gINT
I find Holebase much more user-friendly and intuitive although have not used for as long as gINT. It seems to handle the data in a much more reliable way and I've yet to find pesky bugs. Whilst gINT feels like a polished interface to what is in essence a simple database, …
User Ratings
AFT FathomgINT
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AFT FathomgINT
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
Suitable for all organisations that are required to collate, store and generate borehole site logs in a timely and orderly fashion. Can also be used for the storage of .ags data if setup correctly. Handles multiple projects well but is not without hiccups when used regularly. I believe it is possible to draw section views however have not done so myself.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Borehole logs
  • Storage of geotech data.
  • Customisable
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Bugs bugs bugs.
  • Confusing interface.
  • Split-logs cumbersome to generate.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
I find Holebase much more user-friendly and intuitive although have not used for as long as gINT. It seems to handle the data in a much more reliable way and I've yet to find pesky bugs. Whilst gINT feels like a polished interface to what is in essence a simple database, Holebase feels like a bespoke piece of software.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Central piece of software for collation and storage of all site data.
  • Storage and checker of ags data.
  • Professional looking logs.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots