TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Aqua Cloud Native Security Platform vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Aqua Cloud Native Security Platform

    Score6.4 out of 10
    N/AThe Aqua Platform is an integrated Cloud Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP), that prioritizes risk and automates prevention while also focussing on detection and response across the lifecycle. It aims to stop current and prevent future cloud native attacks.

    $10,188

    per year

    Microsoft Defender for Cloud

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Defender for Cloud is a Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) and Cloud Workload Protection Platform (CWPP) for Azure, on-premises, and multicloud (Amazon AWS and Google GCP) resources.N/A
    Pricing
    Aqua Cloud Native Security PlatformMicrosoft Defender for Cloud
    Editions & Modules
    Team
    $10,188
    per year
    Advanced
    $25,188
    per year
    Enterprise
    Tiered Pricing
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Aqua Cloud Native Security PlatformMicrosoft Defender for Cloud
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Aqua Cloud Native Security PlatformMicrosoft Defender for Cloud
    Considered Both Products
    Aqua Security
    No answer on this topic
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Would buy again
    66 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    95%
    Delivers good value for the price
    61 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    96%
    Happy with the feature set
    65 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    55 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Implementation went as expected
    57 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    Aqua Cloud Native Security PlatformMicrosoft Defender for Cloud
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
    Score9 out of 10
    Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
    Score9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Microsoft Defender for Cloud
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Aqua Cloud Native Security PlatformMicrosoft Defender for Cloud
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.6
    (2 ratings)
    8.6
    (70 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.9
    (4 ratings)
    Usability
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    7.8
    (15 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Aqua Cloud Native Security PlatformMicrosoft Defender for Cloud
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Aqua Security
    Excellent tool for identifying Cloud security issues such as vulnerabilities or misconfigurations. The complaince scanning ability is perfect for enterprise organization to maintain complaince based off various complaince programs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    I think it's good for cloud-native companies. A company that, from day zero, they're like, "We're going cloud, and this is how we're going to do it." They get it. It works well for them. Smaller organizations that are under X amount of resources- I don't know what that X might mean- but I feel like it plays well in smaller, more nimble organizations. If you're an older organization or if you're extremely large, it starts becoming a little difficult to manage at scale. And you have to sometimes throw bodies at the problem. Maybe not the most eloquent way of saying it, but that's what it feels like.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Aqua Security
    • seamless integration with GitHub, Jfrog, etc
    • Easy configuration of security policy
    • detailed instructions regarding finding of Vulnerabilities
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • It's really well laid out, with an easy-to-use, accessible UI.
    • With Microsoft Defender for Cloud, it has everything you need with the Safelink attachment, the Safelink emails for URL, the way it scans those URLs and attachments within the product, and you're seeing the results. And that adds an extra layer of security for the user, so you feel comfortable knowing the product monitors those. That's something I really like about that product.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Aqua Security
    • The UI/UX of the Aqua platform has several issues, especially with the sign up/in flow, authentication, alerts and display of results
    • Missing a few prominent notification channels for alerts such as Datadog, Webhooks
    • Lacks complete granularity in RBAC with the ability to set permissions based on the cloud
    • Some parts of the cocumentation for connecting an Oracle Cloud account is not up to update or clear
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Integrations with on-premise workloads can sometimes be challenging. Needs improvement and well standardised integration points
    • Vulnerability categories can be difficult to understand. It should allow teams to focus on critical findings and help them keep aside low-severity or suppressed vulnerabilities
    • Pricing can be improved as it can be over-priced for smaller businesses and would potentially affect their ROI due to the small scale
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Aqua Security
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    It is a great product that integrates nicely when running an Azure platform and even multi-cloud environment. Not looking for point-solutions but a suite that answers most requirements. It is very comfortable being able to use KQL, workbooks and automation that is native to the azure platform
    Read full review
    Usability
    Aqua Security
    The UI and UX of the platform requires some work since the platform is not for all screen sizes and the experience with certain features such as authentication and creating alerts is not great. The session times out while performing an action and having to repeat the entire action once again, which is not a great experience. Adding notification channels while creating the alerts is not seamless. But the platform has good UX with some great documentation for integrations along with the ability to customise dashboards.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Because, so far It is pretty good at its capabilites. And since we mostly use Azure in our organization, its native capabilities are pretty useful. It also has the capability to onboard on premises servers as well, which is pretty useful, so we can centrally manage everything in our organization.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Aqua Security
    Aqua Cloud Native Security Platform is easy to implement and manage compare the Dome9.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    I believe Microsoft Defender for Cloud stacks up well against the other tools we looked at. It is native to the Azure platform and provides the same insights as the other tools. We selected Microsoft Defender for Cloud because it integrates well with the Azure resources and gives the needed insight, security alerts and recommendations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Aqua Security
    • ROI is high with our Aqua project.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Ensuring compliance with data protection regulations can prevent costly fines and legal issues, positively impacting ROI.
    • Effective cloud resource protection can optimize cloud spending and resource utilization, ultimately reducing cloud infrastructure costs.
    • The subscription costs associated with Defender for Cloud can add to an organization's operational expenses, impacting ROI.
    • Smaller organizations may find the feature set and complexity of Defender for Cloud unnecessary, potentially overinvesting in security solutions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Microsoft Defender for Cloud Screenshots

    Screenshot of Remediation of critical issues in codeScreenshot of Cloud security benchmark mapped to industry FramworksScreenshot of Prioritization of critical risks with contextual threat analysisScreenshot of Workload protectionScreenshot of Unified DevOps VisibilityScreenshot of Visualizations to improve security posture proactively