Arista Extensible Operating System (EOS) vs. HPE Aruba Networking Operating System

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Arista EOS
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Arista Extensible Operating System (EOS) is a network operating system.N/A
HPE Aruba Networking Operating System
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
ArubaOS is the network operating system from Aruba Networks, an HPE company. ArubaOS includes AirMatch and ClientMatch, capabilities that monitor and optimize Wi-Fi power, channels, connections and bandwidth across the entire wireless network to improve user experience. Users can manage up to 10,000 APs, cluster up to 12 controllers, and segment traffic from one AP to multiple controllers with MultiZone.N/A
Pricing
Arista Extensible Operating System (EOS)HPE Aruba Networking Operating System
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Arista EOSHPE Aruba Networking Operating System
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
Arista Extensible Operating System (EOS)HPE Aruba Networking Operating System
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
Cisco NX-OS
Cisco NX-OS
Score 8.0 out of 10
Cisco NX-OS
Cisco NX-OS
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Arista Extensible Operating System (EOS)HPE Aruba Networking Operating System
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(1 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Arista Extensible Operating System (EOS)HPE Aruba Networking Operating System
Likelihood to Recommend
Arista Networks
It is well suited in environments that have a low change rate. Once configured, the Arista Extensible Operating System (EOS) is rock solid but changes can be a little cumbersome. The good news is that the learning curve of the Arista Extensible Operating System (EOS) commands is relative short. Many of the commands are similar to other vendors and so expertise in one command set should easily translate to Arista Extensible Operating System (EOS). Our network admins had no problem making the adjustment.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Aruba Wireless works quite well and is stable for enterprise. Once it's running, it works. Once you have it set up, you don't normally need to go in and make changes. Aruba is particularly good on pushing clients to use 5ghz (they say they use some kind of a proprietary algorithm). It may not be appropriate for smaller businesses due to cost and complexity
Read full review
Pros
Arista Networks
  • Manage - Arista Extensible Operating System (EOS) is comprehensive enough that all of the commands are present to manage the device and take advantage of all of the unique features.
  • Scale - A single command set across multiple pieces of hardware allow us to script changes and deploy hardware easily.
  • Update - Arista Extensible Operating System (EOS) updates happen seamlessly and often don't require rebooting the underlying hardware thanks to it's module-by-module approach.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • Wireless Access
  • Security/Role Management
  • Firewalling
  • Centralized Management
Read full review
Cons
Arista Networks
  • There are "assumptions" for lack of a better word that are baked into the Arista Extensible Operating System (EOS). While many would be considered best practice, there are others that require a great deal of workarounds for specific environments.
  • Some details about hardware state are hard to get inside the command structure. There aren't summarized views for many of the more routine queries.
  • Logging - It is difficult to output logging to a SIEM collector and also let logs remain on the device.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • Documentation on Aruba website is very lacking
  • Support is hit-or-miss - they may waste a lot of time before you get to someone who has a solution
  • Some configuration items are very non-intuitive
Read full review
Usability
Arista Networks
Many of the commands mimic or are identical to vendor commands. This makes the software incredibly easy to learn and use. My one complaint is that sometimes the details and summaries don't include a lot of details so it takes multiple commands to get all the information. Detailed output doesn't always include data included in the summary. This is relatively minor and may just be a personal preference
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Arista Networks
Cisco IOS is probably a universal standard and one that people usually use in basic network classes. Arista Extensible Operating System (EOS) is so similar to Cisco IOS that the commands to do basic configuration are nearly identical. Arista Extensible Operating System (EOS) includes a lot more detail on reporting but you do have to dig for it. Arista Extensible Operating System (EOS) also allows for much more granular configuration.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Aruba does quite a good job with GUI configuration, especially with AOS 8 - something that Cisco struggles with (maybe they came up with something new now). Aruba can also easily scale. While not on the same level, Ubiquiti has a good GUI but is lacking a good standard controller - users have to stand their own.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Arista Networks
  • No Training Budget Needed - Command set is similar to other vendors and it required no specialized training.
  • Reduced Downtime - Many Arista Extensible Operating System (EOS) updates can happen without rebooting the underlying hardware meaning that downtime is reduced. This makes EVERYONE happy.
  • Few Bugs - There are very few bugs in the Arista Extensible Operating System (EOS) production code thanks to great Q/A work by Arista.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • Good return on investment in terms of a working wireless network for thousands of users
  • However, troubleshooting and support may be difficult
  • Good integration with ClearPass
Read full review
ScreenShots