AspenONE Engineering vs. OSIsoft PI System, from AVEVA

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AspenONE Engineering
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Aspen Technology headquartered in Bedford offers AspenONE Engineering to refineries as a software design aid, emphasizing process optimization and cost control.N/A
OSIsoft PI System, from AVEVA
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
OSIsoft developed the PI System, a data integration and analytics platform designed to support plant and utilities with operational intelligence and analytics. OSIsoft was acquired by AVEVA in March 2021, and is now an AVEVA brand and solution.N/A
Pricing
AspenONE EngineeringOSIsoft PI System, from AVEVA
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AspenONE EngineeringOSIsoft PI System, from AVEVA
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AspenONE EngineeringOSIsoft PI System, from AVEVA
Top Pros
Top Cons
User Ratings
AspenONE EngineeringOSIsoft PI System, from AVEVA
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(2 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
AspenONE EngineeringOSIsoft PI System, from AVEVA
Likelihood to Recommend
Aspen Technology
In enterprises where another project is tailored to the needs of the client rather than using basic tools. And where the estimate requires comprehensive cost buckets for production operations. When there is a large amount of purchasing history to enter into AspenONE Engineering in order for it to provide reliable projections. Standard equipment manufacturing enterprises are not well suited. Also, because this instrument requires time, when there are time limitation and resource or human limitations.
Read full review
AVEVA
If you have many different DCSs or PLCs in your manufacturing plant, OSIsoft PI System does the job quite well to integrate all different types of sources and data. We have Yokogawa, Mitsubishi, Hitachi, and Azbil DCS and PLC. Connecting them is not a problem.
Read full review
Pros
Aspen Technology
  • Once an estimate is made, it can be simply copied and modified for another similar equipment estimate
  • ACCE can be customized per the company's requirements
  • Templates for each equipment style can be made and can be used repeatedly
  • Very detailed reporting, of each cost segment like steel, electrical, civil, instruments is available for analysis
Read full review
AVEVA
  • Ability to integrate with many 3rd-party systems, 70 sources as per their marketing claims
  • Great for big data management
Read full review
Cons
Aspen Technology
  • The User Guide is far too large to browse and learn from.
  • Documentation is detailed while also being complicated.
  • Any modifications that need to be made will take a long time.
Read full review
AVEVA
  • Missing some features and has some bugs
Read full review
Usability
Aspen Technology
We began assessing several tools when we began estimating for a full process plant or various styles of equipment. We also investigated implementing an ERP system used by the sales and item engineering departments.
Read full review
AVEVA
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Aspen Technology
The support team is always available for help. They are agile and cheerful.
Read full review
AVEVA
Good local support. The only issue is that there are not many system integrators that are well versed with OSIsoft. The implementation is also very costly.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Aspen Technology
Again answering from the ACCE perspective (Estimating tool) - Previously when we did estimates for simple equipment we had used excel estimates and lotus reporting. However, as we started estimating for an entire process plant or various style of equipment, we had started evaluating various tools. We had also considered using an ERP system that is utilized by Purchasing and Product Engineering teams, however, ACCE seemed a better fit for the amount of detailed estimating needed. And the robustness and various options available made us select this tool.
Read full review
AVEVA
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Aspen Technology
  • Investment apart from the cost of tool, is time - It is very time taking to obtain the results required
  • We are being trained by a professional consultant on ACCE, and yet to see the ROI
  • Detailed estimates as needed by Product Engineering is a plus
Read full review
AVEVA
  • Real-time data
  • We don't require constant updates during crisis from a technician who usually will update to BCP team via WhatsApp.
Read full review
ScreenShots