AtomicWriter vs. Hygraph

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AtomicWriter
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
AtomicWriter helps users create original content optimized to maximize visibility for content marketing campaigns.N/A
Hygraph
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Hygraph (previously GraphCMS) is a native GraphQL Headless Content Management System (CMS) and now evolved as a Federated Content Platform, enabling teams across the world to unify, structure, enrich and distribute content from anywhere to anywhere.
$299
per month
Pricing
AtomicWriterHygraph
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Professional
$299
per month per project
Scale
$899
per month per project
Enterprise
Custom
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AtomicWriterHygraph
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details35% discount for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AtomicWriterHygraph
Features
AtomicWriterHygraph
Content Creation
Comparison of Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
AtomicWriter
10.0
1 Ratings
25% above category average
Hygraph
-
Ratings
Ideation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Approval workflows10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content collaboration10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content calendar10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Network for content licensing/production10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content Publishing
Comparison of Content Publishing features of Product A and Product B
AtomicWriter
9.4
1 Ratings
18% above category average
Hygraph
-
Ratings
Content hub10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Forms / Gated content10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Embedded CTAs10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content distribution9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content automation8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Content Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
AtomicWriter
8.2
1 Ratings
10% above category average
Hygraph
-
Ratings
Audience profiling and targeting7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Closed-loop tracking and reporting9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content performance analytics8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Campaign optimization dashboard9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Competitive analytics8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Hybrid CMS
Comparison of Hybrid CMS features of Product A and Product B
AtomicWriter
-
Ratings
Hygraph
8.7
1 Ratings
0% above category average
Collaborative editing00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Content templates00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Approval and authoring workflows00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AtomicWriterHygraph
Small Businesses
OutboundEngine
OutboundEngine
Score 10.0 out of 10
Contentful
Contentful
Score 7.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OutboundEngine
OutboundEngine
Score 10.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AtomicWriterHygraph
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
AtomicWriterHygraph
Likelihood to Recommend
Atomic Reach
AtomicWriter is especially suitable for blog writing and for this type of work. It also gives different formats and restructures it with a great view. I think that's it.
Read full review
Hygraph
I would recommend GraphCMS to anyone who is also using Gatsby to build their website. If not, I would recommend them to consider GraphCMS but also consider other options. GraphCMS is a tool in which you are responsible to make the most out of it, but sometimes this requires more time and knowledge than a normal engineer may be able to handle. But with more time and attention, the reward of off-lifting content creation from the developers is a huge time saver in the long run.
Read full review
Pros
Atomic Reach
  • Makes my writing awesome.
  • Restructures it.
  • Gives me different writing formats.
Read full review
Hygraph
  • GraphCMS is easy to work with from the "non-engineer" side of things.
  • GraphCMS is very flexible on what data models we can create and how those models are formed.
  • GraphCMS uses Graph API, which is easy to write (compared to older API patterns).
Read full review
Cons
Atomic Reach
  • Nothing too bad.
  • Needs more features.
  • Should be less expensive.
Read full review
Hygraph
  • GraphCMS is very expensive at the enterprise level.
  • GraphCMS requires deep knowledge of the system and requires lots of time to be efficient with it (especially around creating specific data patterns/relationships).
  • Multiple times a day, the system will give us errors when attempting to save something but the errors are unclear as to what went wrong (can be irritating).
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Atomic Reach
No answers on this topic
Hygraph
We picked GraphCMS since it used Graph API and easily integrated it into our Gatsby website. It was also cheap (free) and easy to test out the product, making it easier to prove to our company we should pay for the product in the long run. Lastly, it seems to have a bunch of support from other developers which makes us confident will be around for a while (and we won't need to replace it anytime soon). Note: I also looked at Directus and DatoCMS but these were not options within TrustRadius
Read full review
Return on Investment
Atomic Reach
  • Nothing at all
  • -
  • -
Read full review
Hygraph
  • Better use of time for our engineers in the long run.
  • More control of content for people outside of the engineer team.
  • Allows people to edit the content on their own, so they don't need to wait until a developer is available to add something to the website.
Read full review
ScreenShots