Authlogics Multi-Factor Authentication vs. WSO2 Identity Server

Authlogics can be used anywhere there is a need for second factor authentication. Moreover, if you care about users and want something easy for them to use then 1.5 MFA from Authlogics is a blessing. However, if you have the need the users should use their device or something they have always then this is not the ideal solution.

Incentivized

If your systems are using standard authentication models then it is well suited. OpenID Connect, SAML 2.0 etc are all supported.

Incentivized

• Second Factor Authentication
• Integration
• User Manager
• Deviceless Authentication

Incentivized

• It's open source so is highly configurable
• WSO2 provides their own paid support which is an essential add-on
• Implementation is straightforward and conforms to all major standards

Incentivized

• Auto Update
• User Onboarding

Incentivized

• Overall, the product works well but does take time and effort to implement in highly complex environments. However, I do not believe this is unique to WS02.

Incentivized

The only advantage of Google Authenticator is that it is free. Authlogics has many more features than Google Authenticator especially 1.5 MFA which is unique to it. It has official support which comes in handy when users face authentication issues or the radius servers having problems. Moreover, it can be integrated with active directory providing a central place of administration for your users.

Incentivized

It's Oracle. Highly expensive and limited options

Incentivized

• 0 incidents of MFA theft
• Universal User Acceptance
• Meeting various security standards

Incentivized

• WSO2 works well when you need specific user sign-up information and allows you to then tailor the access, for example, to the job role or area of discipline. We use this to tailor the learning offered to a user upon initial login.

Incentivized