AutomationHQ vs. EasyQA

The AutomationHQ tool is well suited for small to medium size projects, but sometimes there is difficulty in the case of complex elements which are present within multiple Iframes.

The complexity of the product is too high, so even changes to a single feature impact many other functionalities. Using EasyQA has helped us create multiple test cases where the feature may have its effects and test and track the progress on as many related functionalities as possible.

Incentivized

• The best thing I liked about AutomationHQ is that it intelligently identify web elements and track changes in real-time applications
• It supports Data driven testing from mainly three data sources from Excel/XML/JSON
• There are myriad pre-build test steps, which we can use to built our own scripts.

• Creation of test cases for new features
• Management of created bugs
• Bug tracking and analysis

Incentivized

• AutomationHQ doesn’t have test cases version control, we have to currently manually do this by copying the test script and [renaming] with the version. I wish AHQ can implement the version control so I don’t have to keep test script copies
• Complex elements like within multiple iframes have difficulty at run time. It seems we have to run it multiple time until AHQ's AI algorithm "learn" what is the right way

• In my experience, they provide poor support
• The application is still a bit buggy

Incentivized

• We have received gains for about 150% over a long period of time