Avatar Systems vs. Corva vs. gINT

Avatar Systems is appropriate for basic routine medical visit charting. In my opinion, I would not use it for anythin beyond that. I was not impressed with Avatar's capabilities and customization. The system is great for locked down user level permissions.

Incentivized

Suitable for all organisations that are required to collate, store and generate borehole site logs in a timely and orderly fashion. Can also be used for the storage of .ags data if setup correctly. Handles multiple projects well but is not without hiccups when used regularly. I believe it is possible to draw section views however have not done so myself.

Incentivized

• Locked down permissions for access

Incentivized

• Borehole logs
• Storage of geotech data.
• Customisable

Incentivized

• customer service
• customization
• response times to tickets
• tier one support
• post transition support
• functionality improvements for templates
• more robust options for more than basic visit types

Incentivized

• Bugs bugs bugs.
• Confusing interface.
• Split-logs cumbersome to generate.

Incentivized

In my opinion, Avatar Systems would rank low on my list when compared to the others.

Incentivized

I find Holebase much more user-friendly and intuitive although have not used for as long as gINT. It seems to handle the data in a much more reliable way and I've yet to find pesky bugs. Whilst gINT feels like a polished interface to what is in essence a simple database, Holebase feels like a bespoke piece of software.

Incentivized

• Avatar Systems didn't meet all of our needs, but would for a private practice

Incentivized

• Central piece of software for collation and storage of all site data.
• Storage and checker of ags data.
• Professional looking logs.

Incentivized