TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

AVEVA PI System vs. Petrel E&P

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    AVEVA PI System

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AOSIsoft developed the PI System, a data integration and analytics platform designed to support plant and utilities with operational intelligence and analytics. OSIsoft was acquired by AVEVA in March 2021, and is now an AVEVA brand and solution.N/A

    Petrel E&P

    Score6 out of 10
    N/APetrel E&P, from Schlumberger, is a modular suite of applications designed to support exploratory geological study and geological modeling, with features such as data visualization, and other model building tools.N/A
    Pricing
    AVEVA PI SystemPetrel E&P
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AVEVA PI SystemPetrel E&P
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    User Ratings
    AVEVA PI SystemPetrel E&P
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    6.0
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    AVEVA PI SystemPetrel E&P
    Likelihood to Recommend
    AVEVA
    If you have many different DCSs or PLCs in your manufacturing plant, OSIsoft PI System does the job quite well to integrate all different types of sources and data. We have Yokogawa, Mitsubishi, Hitachi, and Azbil DCS and PLC. Connecting them is not a problem.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Schlumberger
    Petrel is an extremely powerful tool and for geological 3D modeling is the go-to tool, it's Sequential Indicator Simulations, Object-Based modeling or multiple point statistics modeling workflows are top notches and I highly advise its use. I wouldn't recommend using it for seismic interpretation based on seismic attributes since it can be a little bit limited in this aspect.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    AVEVA
    • Ability to integrate with many 3rd-party systems, 70 sources as per their marketing claims
    • Great for big data management
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Schlumberger
    • Petrel handles multiple coordinate systems better than competitors.
    • The object tree organization in Petrel is intuitive and user-friendly.
    • Easy to handle data across multiple UTM zones by allowing geodesic coordinates.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    AVEVA
    • Missing some features and has some bugs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Schlumberger
    • Petrel is extremely expensive, working with it in a small company is almost impossible. This shouldn't be an issue for a large company or for a big university with a large budget for investigation.
    • Since it has so many functions it can be overwhelming once you begin using it, so I highly recommend to pay for a Schlumberger instructor.
    • The seismic attributes could be improved since they are not entirely accurate.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    AVEVA
    Good local support. The only issue is that there are not many system integrators that are well versed with OSIsoft. The implementation is also very costly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Schlumberger
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    AVEVA
    No answers on this topic
    Schlumberger
    I use Petrel and competitor products for different functions. If I didn't have Petrel, it would be a lot more difficult to work with my aerially extensive dataset and manipulate my data with geographic coordinates.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    AVEVA
    • Real-time data
    • We don't require constant updates during crisis from a technician who usually will update to BCP team via WhatsApp.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Schlumberger
    • Working at the University of Oklahoma the investment is well paid since geoscientist are formed with the best tool available.
    • Keeping in mind that the software is really expensive, for the product to have an economic positive impact the project's revenue has to be large.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots