TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    AWS OpsWorks

    Score4.3 out of 10
    N/AAWS OpsWorks is a configuration management service that provides managed instances of Chef and Puppet.N/A

    HashiCorp Vagrant

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AVagrant is a tool designed to create and configure lightweight, reproducible, and portable development environments. It leverages a declarative configuration file which describes all software requirements, packages, operating system configuration, and users.N/A
    Pricing
    AWS OpsWorksHashiCorp Vagrant
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AWS OpsWorksHashiCorp Vagrant
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    AWS OpsWorksHashiCorp Vagrant
    Small Businesses
    HashiCorp Vagrant
    Score9 out of 10
    IBM Terraform
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Terraform
    Score8.7 out of 10
    IBM Terraform
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Terraform
    Score8.7 out of 10
    IBM Terraform
    Score8.7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    AWS OpsWorksHashiCorp Vagrant
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.0
    (3 ratings)
    8.0
    (14 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.5
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    AWS OpsWorksHashiCorp Vagrant
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Amazon AWS
    Where you already have some Chef recipes to build your application boxes and are happy to run directly on VMs, OpsWorks really shines. It won't do anything too complex for you, so it only really works well for simple stacks (load balancers, application layers, database layers). If you want to do more complex infrastructure, Cloudformation or Terraform are probably worth looking at.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    I would recommend this tool to a colleague looking to create a repeatably deployable local dev environment based on their staging and production environments. I would recommend this mostly for individuals or teams requiring environments with server-side software such as php, et al. There are likely less processor-heavy and smaller tools for simpler projects.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Amazon AWS
    • connect between serveral AWS services (EC2, RDS, ELB)
    • easy configuration management deployment via Chef
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Vagrant is decentralized so anyone can make a container package to get a project started. you aren't limited to wordpress, or even one style of wordpress install (you can make a sage.io wordpress environment).
    • Vagrant easily lets you set ports and URLs for local development.
    • I have yet to have a problem with Vagrant, as opposed to MAMP and DesktopServer, which both gave me SQL or other issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Amazon AWS
    • Getting up and running with OpsWorks is a very technical and potentially time-consuming process. You need to know the ins and outs of Chef/Puppet if you really want to get into it and there isn't a convenient way to test out the environment locally so debugging can be time-consuming.
    • To take advantage of some of the newer AWS instance types you need to be running on a VPC, which again is a pain if you don't have a DevOps team.
    • The error logs and monitoring metrics in OpsWorks are pretty basic and haven't changed much over the years.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Because Vagrant is a low-level tool with many ways to configure it, there is a steep learning curve. You don't just have to learn (or install) Vagrant, but also Virtualbox, Ansible and possibly some Vagrant plugins to keep boxes up to date.
    • Support on Windows doesn't seem great. I'm a Mac guy, so it's been very difficult getting things to work as expected when a developer wants to work on Windows.
    • Perhaps I didn't configure it correctly, but the default shared folders are not the best for performance. There are also frequently weird issues regarding file permissions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    Vagrant is fast, versatile and does exactly what we need it to do: spin up virtual servers for local development fast and without trouble.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    A GUI would be nice for entry level users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Amazon AWS
    Unless you pay for a pricey support package getting support on OpsWorks will be pretty slow. Documentation is also relatively limited and sometimes hard to follow when compared to competitors. Generally, we've been able to get the answers we need from OpsWorks support when we run into problems but don't expect rapid responses.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Amazon AWS
    OpsWorks isn't really a direct competitor to Terraform/Cloudformation, but it does allow you to do some of the more simple things on offer quite quickly and effectively. Opsworks was used for this reason, along with existing internal knowledge of Chef. Along with some of the other services on offer from AWS, it is good to use as a stepping stone along the way when building your systems - or perhaps it would be entirely suitable for a fairly simple project.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    I liked lando better because lando seemed extremely easy to setup compared to other VM's and it seemed faster though that project was simpler. Virtualbox I ran on windows and it has a gui and has often been slow. The vagrant boxes I used did well but had slightly more problems than lando.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Amazon AWS
    • very quick way of creating new infrastructure
    • low maintenance costs
    • easy to create high availability setups thus reducing costs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Vagrant is free - It requires a bit of extra technical knowledge in terms of setup, but since it costs nothing it's an excellent resource
    • It can be time consuming to learn, but once you get a good handle on it you're in good shape.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots