AWS OpsWorks vs. PowerServer Cloud PACS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AWS OpsWorks
Score 4.3 out of 10
N/A
AWS OpsWorks is a configuration management service that provides managed instances of Chef and Puppet.N/A
PowerServer Cloud PACS
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Pricing
AWS OpsWorksPowerServer Cloud PACS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AWS OpsWorksPowerServer Cloud PACS
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AWS OpsWorksPowerServer Cloud PACS
Considered Both Products
AWS OpsWorks
Chose AWS OpsWorks
Opsworks will become EOL soon and we have been using the recommended Systems Manager solution recently which offers a lot more flexibility in terms of orchestration technology (ie. higher Chef versions) and easier to integrate with even more AWS services.
Chose AWS OpsWorks
We first got up and running with OpsWorks about 6~7 years ago, at a time when many of its competitors were far more limited. At the time it made sense as the logical tool to go with and getting up and running on the AWS infrastructure was beneficial for the scale we were …
Chose AWS OpsWorks
OpsWorks isn't really a direct competitor to Terraform/Cloudformation, but it does allow you to do some of the more simple things on offer quite quickly and effectively. Opsworks was used for this reason, along with existing internal knowledge of Chef. Along with some of the …
PowerServer Cloud PACS

No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
AWS OpsWorksPowerServer Cloud PACS
Small Businesses
IBM Terraform
IBM Terraform
Score 8.8 out of 10
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Ansible
Ansible
Score 9.1 out of 10
IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Ansible
Ansible
Score 9.1 out of 10
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AWS OpsWorksPowerServer Cloud PACS
Likelihood to Recommend
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AWS OpsWorksPowerServer Cloud PACS
Likelihood to Recommend
AWS Opsworks is good for linking AWS services and setting up and maintaining webservers using Chef. However, it will become EOL soon so we would not recommend starting new projects using it and instead go for the recommended Systems Manager setup
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • The interface is quite intuitive and allows you to discover and easily find what you want to do and what other features are within OpsWorks.
  • Chef integration is pretty seamless and there are a good set of options and operating systems to choose from
  • It makes things like auto scaling set up, either via load or time, more straight forward and intuitive than what you'd typically see via the EC2 console
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • integrating with newer AWS services (ie. ALB)
  • keeping up with Chef releases (ie. locked at 12 currently)
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Unless you pay for a pricey support package getting support on OpsWorks will be pretty slow. Documentation is also relatively limited and sometimes hard to follow when compared to competitors. Generally, we've been able to get the answers we need from OpsWorks support when we run into problems but don't expect rapid responses.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
OpsWorks isn't really a direct competitor to Terraform/Cloudformation, but it does allow you to do some of the more simple things on offer quite quickly and effectively. Opsworks was used for this reason, along with existing internal knowledge of Chef. Along with some of the other services on offer from AWS, it is good to use as a stepping stone along the way when building your systems - or perhaps it would be entirely suitable for a fairly simple project.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • OpsWorks allowed us to access the AWS infrastructure with a considerably lower time investment than we would have otherwise needed when we first implemented it.
  • Since we've been running with OpsWorks we've experienced very little downtime and it's required relatively little maintenance.
  • The main downside of using OpsWorks for us is that it has locked us into a very specific infrastructure that doesn't have the flexibility of many of the newer infrastructure management tools, this may lead to a painful migration down the road. We also run a risk of long outage if it ever does introduce breaking changes as the skillset needed to work with the OpsWorks tooling is very specific not widely available in our company.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots