TrustRadius

Axon Server vs. Confluent

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Axon Server
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Axon Server is a specialized Event Store and message delivery system. It offers scalability and throughput characteristics without requiring complex tuning. Axon Server is designed to perform service discovery and message routing with almost zero configuration. It comes in two variations: standard and enterprise functionality.N/A
Confluent
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Confluent Cloud is a cloud-native service for Apache Kafka used to connect and process data in real time with a fully managed data streaming platform. Confluent Platform is the self-managed version.
$385
per month
Pricing
Axon ServerConfluent
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Basic
$0
Standard
Starting at ~$385
per month
Enterprise
Starting at ~$1,150
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Axon ServerConfluent
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details—Confluent monthly bills are based upon resource consumption, i.e., you are only charged for the resources you use when you actually use them: Stream: Kafka clusters are billed for eCKUs/CKUs ($/hour), networking ($/GB), and storage ($/GB-hour). Connect: Use of connectors is billed based on throughput ($/GB) and a task base price ($/task/hour). Process: Use of stream processing with Confluent Cloud for Apache Flink is calculated based on CFUs ($/minute). Govern: Use of Stream Governance is billed based on environment ($/hour). Confluent storage and throughput is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB). Please also note that all prices are stated in United States Dollars unless specifically stated otherwise. All billing computations are conducted in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Axon ServerConfluent
Features
Axon ServerConfluent
Streaming Analytics
Comparison of Streaming Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Axon Server
-
Ratings
Confluent
9.1
2 Ratings
13% above category average
Real-Time Data Analysis00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Visualization Dashboards00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Data Ingestion from Multiple Data Sources00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Low Latency00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Integrated Development Tools00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Linear Scale-Out00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Data Enrichment00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Axon ServerConfluent
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

IBM Streams (discontinued)
IBM Streams (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Confluent
Confluent
Score 9.2 out of 10
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Spotfire Streaming
Spotfire Streaming
Score 5.3 out of 10
Spotfire Streaming
Spotfire Streaming
Score 5.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Axon ServerConfluent
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Axon ServerConfluent
Likelihood to Recommend
AxonIQ
No answers on this topic
Confluent
If you have a need to stream data, real time or segmented structured data then Confluent is a great platform to do so with. You won't run into packet transfer size limitations that other platforms have. Flexibility in on-prem, cloud, and managed cloud offerings makes it very flexible no matter how you choose to implement.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
AxonIQ
No answers on this topic
Confluent
  • Products work great.
  • Training is available.
  • Customer support is good.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
AxonIQ
No answers on this topic
Confluent
  • Cloud based Azure platform features for Confluent lacks behind AWS And GCP
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Support Rating
AxonIQ
No answers on this topic
Confluent
The support from the Confluent platform is great and satisfying. We have been working with Confluent for more than a year now. They sent out resident architects to help us set up Confluent cluster on our cloud and help us troubleshoot problems we have encountered. Overall, it has been a great experience working with the Confluent Platform.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
AxonIQ
No answers on this topic
Confluent
For our use case it was very important that the technology we were working with fit into our Azure architecture, and met our data processing size requirements to stream data within certain SLAs. Confluent more than met our performance requirements and compared to the others scale options and cost to run it was more than financially viable as a platform solution to our global operations.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
AxonIQ
No answers on this topic
Confluent
  • It enables us to develop event driven application.
  • It increases our ability to handle streaming data.
  • It reduces latency of communication.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots

Axon Server Screenshots

Screenshot of Axon Server Web UI - main screen