Azul Platform Prime vs. ComponentOne

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azul Platform Prime
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Azul Systems headquartered in Sunnyvale is exclusively focused on Java and the Java Virtual Machine (JVM). They build fully supported, standards-compliant runtimes that help enable Java-based businesses. Their services include Azul Platform Prime (formerly Zing), a JVM with "better behavior" enabling sustained performance, fast warmup and predictable latency without GC pauses, jitter or application timeouts. Zing can be deployed in an on-prem data center or on the Cloud.N/A
ComponentOne
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
ComponentOne Studio, from software company GrapeCity in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, provides Visual Studio controls.
$1,495
Per Year Per User
Pricing
Azul Platform PrimeComponentOne
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Enterprise
$1,495.00
Per Year Per User
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azul Platform PrimeComponentOne
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azul Platform PrimeComponentOne
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
Azul Platform PrimeComponentOne
Small Businesses
GraalVM
GraalVM
Score 9.1 out of 10
React
React
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GraalVM
GraalVM
Score 9.1 out of 10
React
React
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
GraalVM
GraalVM
Score 9.1 out of 10
React
React
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azul Platform PrimeComponentOne
Likelihood to Recommend
7.8
(3 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
8.3
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.3
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azul Platform PrimeComponentOne
Likelihood to Recommend
Azul Systems, Inc
If you want some low cost JDK provider where you need the frequent updates as well, you can go ahead for Azul Zing instead of OpenJDK. But if budget is not a concern, I would recommend going for some well known company such as Oracle. Also if you are using Azul for production, make sure to use it for Dev ENV too so as to reproduce issues.
Read full review
GrapeCity
C1 is great for creating custom reports. We have client apps where we've created some fairly complicated reports such as invoices and real estate inspections. We also use the True DBGrid in many of our apps since it is so customizable. Its grouping and filtering features are very nice and can provide summary counts and totals at the bottom or right side of the grid that are very handy.
Read full review
Pros
Azul Systems, Inc
No answers on this topic
GrapeCity
  • The True DBGrid control is nice for showing parent/child relationships and being able to drill down and show the child data. It also is nice for showing summary totals.
  • The report engine is great for building custom reports for Win Forms or web apps. It can do everything that Crystal Reports can do.
  • They have a good selection of controls that can do just about anything you can imagine.
Read full review
Cons
Azul Systems, Inc
  • Support
  • GC logging
Read full review
GrapeCity
  • Sometimes it is difficult to figure out where things are in the properties of controls since there are so many things you can drill down into.
  • I find myself using Bing or Google a lot to look up how to do something. Some things are not very intuitive.
  • Of course, I would always like the price to be cheaper. The high price has caused us to not keep current and have the latest version.
Read full review
Performance
Azul Systems, Inc
Azul has better JVM garbage collection on machines with huge amounts of memory that the OSS version of Java doesn't handle
Read full review
GrapeCity
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Azul Systems, Inc
Prime support has been responsive in helping us tune our JVM parameters and diagnose any lingering Java resource issues.
Read full review
GrapeCity
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Azul Systems, Inc
Oracle was costlier whereas OpenJDK had less frequent updates. Azul was average of both of them, so it was choosen.
Read full review
GrapeCity
We have been in business since 1992, so we have used many different products over the years. The two other products we've primary used that are similar to ComponentOne, are Infragistics and Crystal Reports. Infragistics has a vast array of controls similar to ComponentOne. We use both to be honest and I'm not sure which one I would pick over the other. I guess that would depend on what you're trying to accomplish and if one had some control or capability that the other didn't. ComponentOne does have the reporting capabilities, where Infragistics does not.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Azul Systems, Inc
  • Reduced infra cost than Oracle
Read full review
GrapeCity
  • ComponentOne allows us to add additional features to our apps that wouldn't be found in apps written with just Visual Studio itself. That allows our clients to get more creative in their requirements, which in turn, means more work and billable hours for us!
  • Our apps appear more professional when using ComponentOne which helps us get projects for new clients.
  • ComponentOne also helps us to save clients some money since we are not having to develop things that it can do from scratch.
Read full review
ScreenShots