Azure App Service vs. IBM Cloud Private
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Azure App Service | Score8.2 out of 10 | N/A | The Microsoft Azure App Service is a PaaS that enables users to build, deploy, and scale web apps and APIs, a fully managed service with built-in infrastructure maintenance, security patching, and scaling. Includes Azure Web Apps, Azure Mobile Apps, Azure API Apps, allowing developers to use popular frameworks including .NET, .NET Core, Java, Node.js, Python, PHP, and Ruby. | $9.49 per month |
IBM Cloud Private | Score9.6 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Cloud Private is a Kubernetes-based container platform allowing users to build cloud-native applications on their own infrastructure. In addition, it offers common services for self-service deployment, monitoring, logging and security, as well as middleware, data and analytics. | N/A |
| Azure App Service | IBM Cloud Private | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Free and Shared (preview) plans are ideal for testing applications in a managed Azure environment. Basic, Standard and Premium plans are for production workloads and run on dedicated Virtual Machine instances. Each instance can support multiple applications and domains. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Azure App Service | IBM Cloud Private | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | ![]() No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
82% Would buy again 9 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
91% Delivers good value for the price 10 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
91% Happy with the feature set 10 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
89% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 8 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
91% Implementation went as expected 10 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Azure App Service | IBM Cloud Private | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Platform-as-a-Service |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Azure App Service | IBM Cloud Private | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | IBM Cloud Foundry Score8.5 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Foundry Score8.5 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | IBM Cloud Private Score9.6 out of 10 | AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score8.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score8.6 out of 10 | AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score8.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Azure App Service | IBM Cloud Private | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 6.9 | 10.0 |
| Usability | 6.5 | - |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | - |
| Azure App Service | IBM Cloud Private | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]()
|
|
| Pros | ![]()
|
|
| Cons | ![]()
|
|
| Usability | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered | ![]()
|
|
| Return on Investment | ![]()
|
|
| ScreenShots |




