Azure Batch vs. CA Scheduler Job Management

To better serve their consumers, businesses that often interact with those clients who rely on Microsoft's software products may consider migrating to Azure. This program would be useful in any installation of a Microsoft product or suite that necessitates a test of the target environment. It is simple to maintain and implement, making it an ideal IT backbone. If a client doesn't have any use for this particular instrument, it's not going to be of any benefit to them.

Incentivized

Job scheduling software for the IBM Mainframe is quite mature and most IBM Mainframe sites would already have one installed. It would appear to be very little reason to change from one scheduling package to another. If you were looking for a new scheduling package, CA Technologies is more likely to steer you towards their other product

Incentivized

• Ease of scripting
• Scheduling
• Combination of Data Sets

Incentivized

• Good reporting on completed schedules and jobs including highest return code of jobs.
• ISPF interface can cope with non-standard screen sizes.
• Easy to use ISPF interface

Incentivized

• The UI could be a little more clearer in my opinion.
• Password resets would be nice to have in any instance (not just the default area).
• Easier to migrate repeated account that may have been created.

Incentivized

• Monitoring interface could make better use of screen colours

Incentivized

Both are excellent resources that successfully deliver the promised benefits. Two rival businesses, each with its own distinct culture and set of goals. As far as IT assistance goes, I find Azure's user interface to be slightly more intuitive. Both resources are valuable and have their advantages and disadvantages. Both are crucial if you run a fast-paced business with a large consumer base.

Incentivized

All quite similar and as CA Scheduler had the smallest foot print across the agencies we support it is being decommmissioned

Incentivized

• After setting things up we have reduced time in running all of the processing
• It is promising in allowing us to concentrate on the data rather than the formatting and presentation that can all be automated after it has been processed
• We have reduced the number of products we used before adopting Batch

Incentivized

• Being decommissioned due to software rationalisation.

Incentivized