Azure Cloud Services vs. Oracle Application Container Cloud

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Cloud Services
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Azure Cloud Services is a cloud platform that enables users to create infinitely-scalable cloud applications and APIs. It enables users to build the web and cloud applications needed while also simplifying the management of applications with cloud services, and while ensuring high availability. Users can: scale an environment automatically based on demand and reduce costs, automate operating system and application updates to increase security, and take advantage of integrated health monitoring…
$0.02
per hour
Oracle Application Container Cloud
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
Oracle offers the Application Container Cloud, a PaaS supporting the development of cloud native, 12-factor applications on a modern polyglot platform with Java EE, Java SE, Node.js, PHP, Python, Ruby, GO and .NET.N/A
Pricing
Azure Cloud ServicesOracle Application Container Cloud
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Cloud ServicesOracle Application Container Cloud
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Cloud ServicesOracle Application Container Cloud
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Azure Cloud ServicesOracle Application Container Cloud
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Azure Cloud Services
9.1
3 Ratings
11% above category average
Oracle Application Container Cloud
5.0
1 Ratings
48% below category average
Ease of building user interfaces8.73 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Scalability9.73 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Platform management overhead9.33 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Workflow engine capability7.43 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Platform access control9.73 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Services-enabled integration9.73 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Development environment creation9.02 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Development environment replication9.02 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification9.03 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Issue recovery9.03 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes9.73 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Cloud ServicesOracle Application Container Cloud
Small Businesses
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Score 9.1 out of 10
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloud Private
IBM Cloud Private
Score 9.5 out of 10
IBM Cloud Private
IBM Cloud Private
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloud Private
IBM Cloud Private
Score 9.5 out of 10
IBM Cloud Private
IBM Cloud Private
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Cloud ServicesOracle Application Container Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
9.3
(5 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Cloud ServicesOracle Application Container Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Microsoft Azure Cloud services is a good choice for hosting web applications, based on requirements it can be simple websites or complex web services as well as it provides automating application development and deployment pipeline. It's less appropriate in case of cost-effective option for organizations with tight budget constraints. For very basic static websites, Microsoft Azure's offerings might be seen as overkill.
Read full review
Oracle
For how it is used within the organization it is perfectly fine. We use it for benefits, salary, and vacation tracking. It does make it easy to find your information within the system and make changes.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Effective service management and performance monitoring capability.
  • Reliable security management with excellent access controls.
  • Best orchestration and easy configuration management.
  • Easy on compatibility testing and change management.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Ease of use.
  • User-friendly.
  • Sleek layout.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Just on Cloud deployment for those new to the platform.
  • Multiple data reports creation.
  • Migrating a large amount of data.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Fewer tabs.
  • More direct access to information.
  • More insight into where approvals are within the system.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Oracle
I am not a part of the team that would make this decision but as far as I know they are happy with the platform and how it performs.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Oracle
Incredibly easy to use and learn how to use. The interface is extremely easy to use.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Oracle
The team who helps with the issue is very helpful when resolving the issue and usually can handle it in a very timely manner.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Oracle
The system is very easy to use.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Scalability
  • Cost savings
  • Integration and migration challenges
Read full review
Oracle
  • Employee Empowerment
  • Reduced lagtime
  • Connects correct people to correct situations
Read full review
ScreenShots