Azure Container Apps vs. IBM Cloud Managed Istio

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Container Apps
Score 6.1 out of 10
N/A
Azure Container Apps, part of the Azure suite of products from Microsoft, is a service used to deploy containerized apps without managing complex infrastructure. Users can write code using a preferred programming language or framework, and build microservices with full support for Distributed Application Runtime (Dapr). Scale dynamically based on HTTP traffic or events powered by Kubernetes Event-Driven Autoscaling (KEDA).N/A
IBM Cloud Managed Istio
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
The IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service provides the Managed Istio installation add on, designed to provide additonal control over clusters and the microservices they comprise via automatic updates and lifecycle management of control plane components, and integration with platform logging and monitoring tools.N/A
Pricing
Azure Container AppsIBM Cloud Managed Istio
Editions & Modules
vCPU (seconds)
active usage $0.000024 and idle usage $0.000003
per second 180,000 vCPU-seconds free grant per month
Memory (GiB-Seconds)
active usage $0.000003 and idle usage $0.000003
per second 360,000 GiB-seconds free grant per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Container AppsIBM Cloud Managed Istio
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Container AppsIBM Cloud Managed Istio
Features
Azure Container AppsIBM Cloud Managed Istio
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Azure Container Apps
5.4
2 Ratings
37% below category average
IBM Cloud Managed Istio
8.0
5 Ratings
2% above category average
Ease of building user interfaces5.62 Ratings6.95 Ratings
Scalability7.62 Ratings7.95 Ratings
Platform management overhead6.92 Ratings7.85 Ratings
Workflow engine capability5.62 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Platform access control4.72 Ratings8.75 Ratings
Services-enabled integration4.62 Ratings8.65 Ratings
Development environment creation4.42 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Development environment replication4.02 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification5.32 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Issue recovery4.02 Ratings8.95 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes6.52 Ratings7.25 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Container AppsIBM Cloud Managed Istio
Small Businesses
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.4 out of 10
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Container AppsIBM Cloud Managed Istio
Likelihood to Recommend
6.3
(2 ratings)
8.7
(5 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
2.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Container AppsIBM Cloud Managed Istio
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Azure Container Apps is a welcome addition for sure. Based on my experience, this has enabled us to move fully to the cloud and managed everywhere in one spot and on the go. We can scale it to our end as much as we would like. It can be assess anywhere and it is fully secure
Read full review
IBM
Clearly, the [IBM Cloud Managed Istio] tool is very useful when you have multiple services and each service is connecting with other services through APIs in different networks. To manage this type of complex network, [IBM Cloud Managed Istio] is very useful. It comes with a license that can increase the billing of your project so make sure if your application network mesh, monitoring cannot be managed on your own then you can use it. If your application is not very complex then you have many tools available like Grafana, Prometheus, Sumo Logic, which you can integrate individually with your cluster and implement. In this type of scenario, it is better to not use [IBM Cloud Managed Istio] and it will serve your purpose as well.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Gives user a level of autonomous access
  • No control plane or node pool to manage
  • Less kubernetes experience required
  • Easily integrate with Azure devops
Read full review
IBM
  • Layers transparently onto existing applications
  • Allows control of access and rules to be developed
  • Creates metrics for usage
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Continue to enhance security
  • Better pricing
  • Flexibility
Read full review
IBM
  • Some more functionalities added could improve it better.
  • Better technical user guidance.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
I would rather use AKS for my critical applications. The fact that the deployment process is dependent on as cli makes it hard for us to integrate with our standard CI/CD tools
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Usability
Microsoft
Azure Container Apps are fantastic and it is a game changer. I would recommend it to anyone considering it. As you can scale it to what you would like and it is fully cloud native with better security. It is a no brainier not to consider it. I do believe that with further improve it will become even more attractive
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
IBM
Training and usage support available
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Read full review
IBM
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • As it is cloud native, we no longer required to have onsite prem
  • Reducing both from an energy and security perspective
  • It is worth the investment as we have saved about 10% of our ICT cost
Read full review
IBM
  • It reduced the complexity of network mesh (ingress/egress services).
  • One tool with many solutions. No need to integrate monitoring tools or notification tools.
  • It reduced the number of lines of YAML code.
  • It reduced the number of labor hours.
Read full review
ScreenShots