Azure Container Instances vs. Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes

Azure Container Instances

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Azure Container Instances	Score 6.1 out of 10	N/A	Microsoft's Azure Container Instances allows developers to focus on building apps without managing virtual machines or having to learn new tools—it's just the application, in a container, running in the cloud.	$0.01 Per GB Per Hour
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes	Score 9.8 out of 10	N/A	Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes provides end-to-end management visibility and control to manage a Kubernetes environment. Users take control of application modernization program with management capabilities for cluster creation, application lifecycle, and provide security and compliance for all of them across data centers and hybrid cloud environments. Clusters and applications are all visible and managed from a single console, with built-in security policies.	N/A

Pricing

Azure Container Instances

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes

Editions & Modules

Memory: $0.00533
Per GB Per Hour
vCPU: $0.04860
Per vCPU

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Azure Container Instances	Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Azure Container Instances	Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Top Pros	Pro Works good	No answers on this topic
Top Cons	Minus Need to work	No answers on this topic

Features

Azure Container Instances

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes

Container Management

Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
	Azure Container Instances - Ratings	Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 8.4 1 Ratings 7% above category average
Security and Isolation	00 Ratings	10.01 Ratings
Cluster Management	00 Ratings	10.01 Ratings
Storage Management	00 Ratings	10.01 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization	00 Ratings	8.01 Ratings
Discovery Tools	00 Ratings	10.01 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks	00 Ratings	7.01 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery	00 Ratings	7.01 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging	00 Ratings	5.01 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Azure Container Instances	Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Small Businesses	Portainer Score 9.3 out of 10	Portainer Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service Score 9.3 out of 10	IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises	IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service Score 9.3 out of 10	IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service Score 9.3 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Azure Container Instances	Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Azure Container Instances	Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Likelihood to Recommend	Microsoft No answers on this topic	Red Hat Well suited for - Large-scale Edge deployments of OpenShift instances. Policy-based consistency for all workloads is Less appropriate for - Small-scale deployments. Stand-alone deployments of K8s clusters. Deployments in the same data center. Asad Khan Systems Solution Architect Read full review
Pros	Microsoft No answers on this topic	Red Hat Continuous deployment of other OpenShift instances. Controls clusters and applications from a single console. Built-in Security & compliance. Asad Khan Systems Solution Architect Read full review
Cons	Microsoft No answers on this topic	Red Hat Initial deployment of the ACM itself needs to be made easy. Dependency on the Software versions of underlying open shift workloads during upgrades. LCM of ACM itself. Asad Khan Systems Solution Architect Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Microsoft No answers on this topic	Red Hat I have also used TNA by Google Cloud, but that is not mature enough as ACM. Right now, ACM is the best choice as a cluster manager for private cloud data centers. Asad Khan Systems Solution Architect Read full review
Return on Investment	Microsoft No answers on this topic	Red Hat Reduced the deployment duration of individual nodes by 50%. Acts as a central manager for all the clusters. Provides a lot of infrastructure options (storage, networking, etc) to build instances of your choice. Asad Khan Systems Solution Architect Read full review
ScreenShots