Azure Firewall Manager vs. ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Firewall Manager
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Azure Firewall Manager provides central network security policy and route management for globally distributed, software-defined perimeters. It offers centralized configuration and management of multiple Azure Firewall instances, across Azure regions and subscriptions.
$100
per policy per region
ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
ManageEngine offers Firewall Analyzer, a firewall security and policy management option supporting change and compliance of network security devices.
$395
per year
Pricing
Azure Firewall ManagerManageEngine Firewall Analyzer
Editions & Modules
Azure Firewall Manager Integrations
$0.40
per deployment hour
Azure Firewall Manager
$100
per policy per region
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Firewall ManagerManageEngine Firewall Analyzer
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Firewall ManagerManageEngine Firewall Analyzer
Features
Azure Firewall ManagerManageEngine Firewall Analyzer
Firewall Security Management
Comparison of Firewall Security Management features of Product A and Product B
Azure Firewall Manager
7.2
3 Ratings
10% below category average
ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer
7.2
8 Ratings
10% below category average
Policy planning and rule management7.03 Ratings7.07 Ratings
Automated Policy Orchestration8.52 Ratings6.44 Ratings
Device Discovery6.33 Ratings8.08 Ratings
Policy Compliance Auditing7.73 Ratings9.08 Ratings
Attack Path Simulation Testing8.03 Ratings4.54 Ratings
Anomalous Event or Behavior Deviation7.33 Ratings9.16 Ratings
Vulnerability Scans6.03 Ratings6.08 Ratings
Firewall Rule Cleanup7.03 Ratings7.96 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Firewall ManagerManageEngine Firewall Analyzer
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Palo Alto Panorama
Palo Alto Panorama
Score 8.7 out of 10
Palo Alto Panorama
Palo Alto Panorama
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
Score 8.8 out of 10
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Firewall ManagerManageEngine Firewall Analyzer
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(3 ratings)
9.0
(8 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.8
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Firewall ManagerManageEngine Firewall Analyzer
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Azure Firewall manager is best suited where you have multiple firewalls, and we can manage it centrally in one dashboard. Less appropriate for small companies as it is a bit expensive.
Read full review
ManageEngine, A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
Offering enhanced network security, performance, and connectivity, it is well as used in a business setting. Features including application control, web content filtering, firewall, IP address, application control, VPN, and good advanced threat protection. With enhanced features and advanced threat protection you get an awesome performance cost effective firewall device.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Security
  • Firewall
  • Traffic
Read full review
ManageEngine, A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
  • Live traffic monitor: Firewall Analyzer lets us monitor traffic as it flows through the firewalls. It also breaks it down according to what type of traffic (e.g., web, mail, FTP, etc.) it is. It lists the tops hosts, the top users from traffic, and a lot of other useful statistics, all in a very visual format.
  • Security Monitoring: Another good visual graph Firewall Analyzer provides is the security one, which shows us if we're being attacked, from where, by what, how many, etc. It will also send us alerts when there's an alarm of any kind on the firewall.
  • Reporting: We can run all sorts of custom reports, and that helps us both with compliance and informing management as to what's going on. It would be difficult to describe all the various kinds of things we can include in these reports, but they are extensive.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Bulk IP address fails, requires you to split it up smaller
  • Firewall Rules dont always have good descriptions
  • No Traffic Splitting
Read full review
ManageEngine, A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
  • Configuration is easy and you can expect all the features and modules.
  • Simple and intuitive dashboard.
  • Firewall Analyzer helps us to gain insight into security threat and traffic.
  • Analyze the user behavior.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
ManageEngine, A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
It is fast to
download the test software and implement. It takes some sometime to understand the
ways you have to on board your firewalls into it. It is nice to buy and just
activate the product that you have already installed. Maybe some wizards could
be improved in order to accelerate these tasks.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
We Selected Azure Firewall Manager because of its reliable service and Security, which they provide across our network architecture.
Read full review
ManageEngine, A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
ManageEngine was chosen over the use of AlgoSec as it slotted nicely with other Manage engine services we use for services such as active directory management. Other benefits include how lightweight and easy to install and set up it is. You can install it inside your network and start testing within 20 minutes.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Externally hosted firewall.
  • No cost having on Orem appliance.
  • Cheaper as we only pay for what is use in Azure for it.
Read full review
ManageEngine, A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
  • Firewall Analyzer has definitely freed up a lot of IT's time, by congregating logs and displaying them in a more useful, visual way.
  • The cost for licenses and proactive alerting, compared to the man-hours spent reactively through data, paid for itself in a few months.
  • There was no negative impact to users, and only some to IT staff who had to train on the software, which mostly consisted of videos and playing around with the software.
Read full review
ScreenShots